Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Bloomington Health Foundation Inc

We are committed to empowering community partners and others to eliminate adverse health issues, remove access barriers, and improve health outcomes.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$7.8MCrime & Legal$361kHousing & Shelter$232kFood & Nutrition$175kPublic Benefit$155kYouth Development$146kRecreation & Sports$139kPhilanthropy$70kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 10 grants below total $1,100,327 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,149,088 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $48,761 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $445k
  • $250k+2 grants · $559k
$83,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOOMINGTON HOSPITAL AUXILIARY$300,000
CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY - CENTRAL INDIANA$259,353
HEALTHNET$205,332
NEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC$86,436
BLOOMINGTON MEALS ON WHEELS$83,000
YOUTH FIRST$70,500
MOTHER HUBBARD'S CUPBOARD$49,530
MONROE COUNTY UNITED MINISTRIES$19,072
BLOOMINGTON COMMUNITY PARK AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC$15,596
SUMMIT HILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$11,508
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $57k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WHEELER MISSION: $13k → 18%WHEELER MISSION: $8k → 18%AREA 10 AGENCY ON AGING: $37k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.3M · 15 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$7.3M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+47%

Still filing today

93%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $383k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Indiana University Health Foundation Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $4.3M · revenue +379%
  • CS
    CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY INDIANA
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +20%
  • HI
    HEALTHNET INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $274k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • IU
    Indiana University Health Bloomington Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1.3M · revenue +75%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA
    one grant, 2020 · $70k · revenue -62%
  • A1
    AREA 10 COUNCIL ON AGING OF MONROE AND OWEN COUNTIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $37k · revenue +5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Healthlinc Incorporated

Coordinate health care information by providing a community-wide clinical data and information exchange to the health care community.

2
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Physicians Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
4
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
5
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
6
Indiana University Health Blackford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health White Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health Jay Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
10
Indiana University Health Ball Memorial Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Southern Indiana Community Health Care

To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…

Health
12
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healthnet Inc and the most unlike its peers is Be Loved Transportation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealthcare System Infrastru…Academic Medical CentersIndiana Civic & Policy Advo…Youth Support & Reentry Ser…Industry Trade Associations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Indiana University Health Foundation Inc — $4,263,648 · HealthIndiana University Health Foundation IncIndiana University Health Bloomington Inc — $1,298,875 · HealthIndiana University Health Bloomington IncCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY INDIANA — $1,251,454 · HealthCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY INDIANAHEALTHNET INC — $273,776 · Health+3 more — $312,961 · HealthBloomington Hospital Auxiliary — $300,000 · OtherCatholic Charities Bloomington Inc — $246,738 · OtherVolunteers in Medicine Clinic of Monroe County Inc — $27,500 · OtherAREA 10 COUNCIL ON AGING OF MONROE AND OWEN COUNTIES INC — $36,632 · Other+8 more — $72,044 · OtherCITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY JUSTICE INC — $356,286 · Crime & LegalNEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC — $175,300 · Housing & ShelterSUMMIT HILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $36,508 · Housing & ShelterBloomington Community Park And Recreation Foundation Inc — $139,070 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA — $70,000 · PhilanthropyMOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC — $91,708 · Food & NutritionBloomington Meals on Wheels Inc — $83,000 · Food & NutritionPATHWAYS INC — $154,601 · Public Benefit
Health$7,400,714Other$682,914Crime & Legal$356,286Housing & Shelter$211,808Philanthropy$209,070Food & Nutrition$174,708Public Benefit$154,601

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetIndiana University Health Foundation Inc — $4,263,648 over 4y, 7.2% of budgetIndiana University Health Bloomington Inc — $1,298,875 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY INDIANA — $1,251,454 over 5y, 19% of budgetCITIZENS FOR COMMUNITY JUSTICE INC — $356,286 over 3y, 64% of budgetHEALTHNET INC — $273,776 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCatholic Charities Bloomington Inc — $246,738 over 3y, 11% of budgetNEW HOPE FAMILY SHELTER INC — $175,300 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetPATHWAYS INC — $154,601 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetCENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INC — $153,628 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH FIRST — $141,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBloomington Community Park And Recreation Foundation Inc — $139,070 over 3y, 20% of budgetMOTHER HUBBARDS CUPBOARD INC — $91,708 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetBloomington Meals on Wheels Inc — $83,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SOUTH CENTRAL INDIANA — $70,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetAREA 10 COUNCIL ON AGING OF MONROE AND OWEN COUNTIES INC — $36,632 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSUMMIT HILL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $36,508 over 2y, 8.9% of budgetVolunteers in Medicine Clinic of Monroe County Inc — $27,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $20,016 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEALTHNET FOUNDATION INC — $18,333 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BLOOMINGTON INC — $5,028 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Bloomington and Monroe County IncIN34.7× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Bloomington and Monroe County Inc · United Way of South Central Indiana · The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Baxter International Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Hoosier Hills Food Bank Inc · Boston Scientific Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bloomington Health Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph