Loading…
· Public charity
Blessings International
Blessings International is a non-profit organization whose mission is to heal the hurting by providing pharmaceuticals, vitamins, and medical supplies to traveling medical teams and local clinics; to build healthy communities by treating the poor and victims of endemic medical problems, disease, or overwhelming disasters; to transform…
$3.1M
Granted FY2023
5
Grants
4
Communities
$12k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2023.
Religion$118kHuman Services$37kHealth$27kArts & Culture$6kOther$17k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
ashlanduninsuredothersexistscaremeals access
2021
—
2025
experiencing unplannedunplanned pregnancyhealthcare
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k4 grants · $32k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$9,112
Median grant
4
States reached
$6.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
- Commission to Every Nation$12,000
- Changed Lives Christian Cente$9,538
- Prestonwood Pregnancy Center$9,112
- Rachel House Pregnancy Resour$7,376
- Willow Pregnancy Support$6,187
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$161k · 5 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2023, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
3
Total granted
$161k
$29k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+34%
-8%
Still filing today
80%
100%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesReligionHealthArts & CultureOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CTCommission to Every Nation3× · 2020–2023 · $48k · revenue +27%
- CLChanged Lives Christian Cente3× · 2020–2023 · $16k · revenue +34%
- RHRachel House Pregnancy Resour3× · 2022–2025 · $15k · revenue +95%
Funded once
- BCBUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICEone grant, 2021 · $13k · revenue -8%
- YBYour Best Pathway to Healthone grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -60%
- J3JOHN 316 MISSIONone grant, 2020 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Choices Medical Clinic Inc
Cmc inc., a christian non-profit clinic, has offered no-cost abortion alternatives to patients since 1999 - including perinatal hospice care for preborn infants with a terminal diagnosis.
Health
2
Life Choices Medical Clinic
Life choices medical clinic exists to minister to the underserved in our community who are in need of pregnancy services and comprehensive womenaposs health care. we serve our patients with love, compassion and a committment to excellence…
Unclassified
3
Christian Healthcare Centers Inc
Christian Healthcare Centers provides affordable, quality and comprehensive healthcare services to the body of Christ and the community.
Health
4
Life Choices Medical Center
Christian organization offering a hopeful future by empowering women and men to make life-affirming decisions
Human Services
5
Pregnancy Resource Clinic
The pregnancy resource clinic is a christ-centered organization that provides trusted care, support, and resources to all people regarding pregnancy and sexual health.
Health
6
Hope Medical
Hope Medical of Washington is a faith-based, non-profit community medical clinic providing compassionate, evidence-based health care services to empower people to make informed decisions. We offer free, confidential services including free…
Human Services
7
Life Choices Crisis Pregnancy Supp
Non-profit medical clinic educating and equipping individuals to make empowered decisions, providing pregnancy confirmation, and offering programs of prevention, intervention, and restoration.
Health
8
Dakota Hope Clinic
Dakota hope is part of a world-wide movement to offer love and support to women and men who face an unintended or unwelcomed pregnancy, or have other sexual health concerns. the clinic is a life-affirming organization; therefore, they do…
Human Services
9
Liberty Womens Clinic
Liberty Women's Clinic ministers with the love of Christ by empowering people to make informed, life-affirming decisions about pregnancy, sexual health, and relationships.
Health
10
Hope Clinic Inc
To be first choice of anyone facing an unplanned pregnancy, with a vision to make make abortions unthinkable for all who come to us.
Health
11
Life Choices Care Center
To provide support for pregnant women
Health
12
Life Choices Care
Life choices care exits to minister to the underserved in our community who are in need of pregancy services and comprehensive womenaposs health care. we serve our patients with love, compassion and a commitment to excellence so that we…
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rachel House Pregnancy Resource and the most unlike its peers is International Medical Response Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
16 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Religion$117,595Human Services$36,954Health$27,150Other$17,342Arts & Culture$6,187
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOAVES & FISHES ↗
- Who funds Commission to Every Nation ↗
- Who funds Changed Lives Christian Cente ↗
- Who funds Rachel House Pregnancy Resour ↗
- Who funds BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE ↗
- Who funds Hope Center for Crisis Pregna ↗
- Who funds Your Best Pathway to Health ↗
- Who funds JOHN 316 MISSION ↗
- Who funds Willow Pregnancy Support ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Mission Pre-Born IncIN13.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Mission Pre-Born Inc · Vitamin Angel Alliance Inc · Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation Blessings International funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Your Best Pathway to Health.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
medium risk
~4 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 813012737 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Your Best Pathway to Health, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
- WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Blessings International?
Find your warmest path to Blessings International through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines