Skip to content
Blessed Angels Community Center at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Blessed Angels Community Center

The charity provides food, clothing, household goods, and other forms of short-term emergency assistance for indigent individuals and families who have insufficient resources to meet their basic needs.

$826k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Human Services$1.4MCommunity Improvement$200kReligion$175kYouth Development$100kFood & Nutrition$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kHealth$15kEducation$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $5,665, the rows itemized in this filing. The $826,010 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $820,345 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,665
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$5,665
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $345k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN ANTONIO: $100k → 16%ALAMO AREA DEVELOPMENT CORP: $25k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER: $100k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $100k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Grants abroad, by region: $420k on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$420k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: PURPOSE IS TO SUPPORT, HELP AND ASSIST FINANCIALLY, RETIRED PEOPLE OF FRENCH NATIONALITY PLACED IN A PRECARIOUS FINANCIAL SITUATION THAT DOES NOT ALLOW THEM TO MEET THEIR NEEDS AND CERTAIN EXPENSES TO IMPROVE THEIR GENERAL WELL BEING.

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 5 repeat orgs$545k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$1.4M
$545k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+13%

Still filing today

40%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1.0M
  • TE
    THE ECONOMICAL CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k
  • CB
    CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $120k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +34%
  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRISTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +47%
  • FS
    Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
—
2
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
3
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
4
San Antonio Tennis Association

Develop and promote the lifetime sport

—
5
Jewish Care System of San Antonio

Jcssa focuses on growing its endowment in order to continue supporting the work of golden manor, inc., dba san antonio jewish senior services, which addresses the needs and enriches the quality of life for san antonio jewish older adults…

Housing & Shelter
6
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
7
Advocates Social Services of San Antonio Texas

To educate qualified individuals of public benefits that they may be entitled to. we accomplish this by working with local city, state, and federal agencies for the purpose of outreach and verification work. recently we have focused mainly…

—
8
Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council

To reduce death/disability related to trauma, disaster and acute illness through implementation of a well-planned and coordinated regional emergency response system.

Health
9
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
10
San Antonio Community Hospital Health Care Service Plan

The san antonio community hospital health care service plan provides health care insurance to the employees of san antonio regional hospital. the mission of the organization has not been formally adopted by the governing body.

—
11
San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…

—
12
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of South Texas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $1,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE ECONOMICAL CENTER: $200,000 · OtherTHE ECONOMICAL CENTERBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $100,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INCSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $100,000 · OtherSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST+10 more: $193,241 · Other+10 moreCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $120,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS BEREAVEME…Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesFamily Service Asso…Jewish Family Service of San Antonio Texas Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesJewish Family Servi…ALAMO AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25,000 · Human ServicesALAMO AREA DEVELOPM…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 · HealthMorgan's Wonderland: $5,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,593,241Human Services$345,000Health$15,000Recreation & Sports$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS: $120,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST: $100,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetFamily Service Association of San Antonio Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Family Service of San Antonio Texas Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $49,241 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO OASIS: $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetALAMO AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spurs GiveThe Texas Cavaliers C…San Antonio Area Foun…Faye L & William L Co…John L Santikos Chari…United Way of San Ant…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Spurs GiveTX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spurs Give · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blessed Angels Community Center funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blessed Angels Community Center. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Blessed Angels Community Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home