Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Blessed Angels Community Center

The charity provides food, clothing, household goods, and other forms of short-term emergency assistance for indigent individuals and families who have insufficient resources to meet their basic needs.

$523k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

Human Services$1.4MCommunity Improvement$200kReligion$175kYouth Development$100kFood & Nutrition$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kHealth$15kEducation$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 1 grants below total $6,884 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $522,725 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $515,841 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$6,884
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK$6,884
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $345k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF SAN ANTONIO: $100k → 16%ALAMO AREA DEVELOPMENT CORP: $25k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER: $100k → 16%FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO: $100k → 16%CHILDREN'S BEREAVEMENT CENTER: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 5 repeat orgs$545k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$1.4M
$545k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+13%

Still filing today

40%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $1.0M
  • TE
    THE ECONOMICAL CENTER
    2× · 2022–2023 · $200k
  • CB
    CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $120k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • BB
    BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +34%
  • ST
    SOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRISTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +47%
  • FS
    Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +10%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Automobile Dealers Association Foundation Inc
2
Tennis Officials of San Antonio Association
Recreation & Sports
3
San Antonio Metropolitan Ministries Inc

Provides short term shelter, housing and other services for the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless in bexar county.

4
San Antonio Foster Care and Adoption and Services

San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.

Human Services
5
San Antonio Tennis Association

Develop and promote the lifetime sport

6
Jewish Care System of San Antonio

Jcssa focuses on growing its endowment in order to continue supporting the work of golden manor, inc., dba san antonio jewish senior services, which addresses the needs and enriches the quality of life for san antonio jewish older adults…

Housing & Shelter
7
San Antonio Report

Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.

Arts & Culture
8
Advocates Social Services of San Antonio Texas

To educate qualified individuals of public benefits that they may be entitled to. we accomplish this by working with local city, state, and federal agencies for the purpose of outreach and verification work. recently we have focused mainly…

9
Southwest Texas Regional Advisory Council

To reduce death/disability related to trauma, disaster and acute illness through implementation of a well-planned and coordinated regional emergency response system.

Health
10
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

11
San Antonio Community Hospital Health Care Service Plan

The san antonio community hospital health care service plan provides health care insurance to the employees of san antonio regional hospital. the mission of the organization has not been formally adopted by the governing body.

12
San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Brothers Big Sisters of South Texas Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alzheimer's Disease & Related Disorders Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $1,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE ECONOMICAL CENTER — $200,000 · OtherTHE ECONOMICAL CENTERBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $100,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INCSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $100,000 · OtherSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST+10 more — $187,576 · Other+10 moreCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS — $120,000 · Human ServicesCHILDRENS BEREAVEMEN…Family Service Association of San Antonio Inc — $100,000 · Human ServicesFamily Service Assoc…Jewish Family Service of San Antonio Texas Inc — $100,000 · Human ServicesJewish Family Servic…ALAMO AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 · Human ServicesALAMO AREA DEVELOPME…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 · HealthMorgan's Wonderland — $5,500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,587,576Human Services$345,000Health$15,000Recreation & Sports$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS — $120,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF SOUTH TEXAS INC — $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSOUTH TEXAS YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $100,000 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetFamily Service Association of San Antonio Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Family Service of San Antonio Texas Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK — $43,576 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO OASIS — $25,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetALAMO AREA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMorgan's Wonderland — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Spurs GiveTX17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Spurs Give · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · San Antonio Area Foundation · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Blessed Angels Community Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph