Skip to content

· Private foundation

Blank Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$91k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$226kPhilanthropy$130kRecreation & Sports$93kEducation$87kArts & Culture$73kReligion$45kCivil Rights$13kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ATHELIC DEPT$21,882
JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION$15,000
JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS$13,700
BERKELEY PREPARATORY SCHOOL$10,000
TEMPLE JUDEA$5,000
TEMPLE BETH AM$5,000
H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE$5,000
GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION$5,000
PROJECT NEW BORN$2,500
PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION$1,250
WLRN$1,200
WPBT2$1,000
ASPEN JEWISH CONGREGATION$1,000
UM SYLVESTER COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$1,000
CHABAD CENTER OF KENDALL$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Cross Creek Volunteer Fire Dept: $250 → 19%CROSS CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $250 → 19%Cross Creek Volunteer Fire Department Inc: $250 → 19%CROSS CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $250 → 19%PROJECT NEW BORN: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of Blank Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Blank Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$378k · 19 repeat orgs$172k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
21

Total granted

$378k
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+107%

Still filing today

58%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    Baptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $120k · revenue +102%
  • JA
    JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $55k · revenue +536%
  • JH
    JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $30k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • BH
    BAPTIST HEALTH S FL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ATHLET
    one grant, 2023 · $28k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI STUDENT IMPACT SCHOLARSHIP
    one grant, 2024 · $23k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Hospital Inc

The primary purpose of the h. lee moffitt cancer center and research institute hospital, inc. ("hospital") is to contribute to the prevention and cure of cancer.

Health
2
University of Miami
—
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
The Jackson Laboratory

The purposes of the laboratory are scientific, medical, charitable, and educational. our mission is to discover precise genomic solutions for disease and empower the biomedical community.

Health
5
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
6
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
7
Miami Children's Health System Inc

Nicklaus Children's Health System is the region's only healthcare system exclusively for children. Our mission is to inspire hope and promote lifelong health by providing the best care to every child. TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF, OR TO…

Health
8
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
9
Miami Cancer Institute At Baptist Health Inc

As part of the baptist health network, the mission of miami cancer institute at baptist health, inc is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve.…

Health
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
11
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
12
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is South Florida Public Media Group Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cross Creek Volunteer Fire Dept Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
14/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BERKELEY PREPARATORY SCHOOL INC: $65,000 · OtherBERKELEY PREPARATORY SCHOOL INCUniversity of Miami Athletic Dept: $35,348 · OtherUniversity of Miami Athletic DeptBAPTIST HEALTH S FL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · OtherBAPTIST HEALTH S FL FOUNDATIONTEMPLE JUDEA: $30,000 · OtherTEMPLE JUDEAUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ATHLET: $27,586 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ATHLETUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI STUDENT IMPACT SCHOLARSHIP: $22,842 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI STUDENT IMPACT SCHOLARSHIPUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ATHELIC DEPT: $21,882 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MIAMI ATHELIC DEPTBAPTISH HEALTH CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $15,000 · Other+20 more: $58,117 · Other+20 moreBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc: $119,500 · HealthBaptist Health South Florid…JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · HealthJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION I…+6 more: $13,650 · Health+6 moreGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $130,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MIAMI JEWISH …+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $55,150 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT ASP…SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTH FLORI…JORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC: $4,600 · Arts & CultureJORGE M PER…CLARION PROJECT INC: $3,000 · Arts & CultureHONEY SHINE INC: $5,000 · InternationalPROJECT NEW BORN INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesCROSS CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesFLORIDA POODLE RESCUE INC: $2,500 · AnimalsUniversity of Miami: $1,000 · Education
Other$305,775Health$163,150Philanthropy$130,500Arts & Culture$68,750International$5,000Human Services$3,500Animals$2,500Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $130,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBaptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc: $119,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $55,150 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC: $6,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHONEY SHINE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetH LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC: $4,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAspen Jewish Center: $4,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCLARION PROJECT INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA POODLE RESCUE INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetAspen Cycling Club Inc: $2,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetPROJECT NEW BORN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISHColorado: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEUKEMIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Baptist Health South Florida Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS ↗
  • Who funds JACKSON HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PBS INC ↗
  • Who funds HONEY SHINE INC ↗
  • Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds H LEE MOFFITT CANCER CENTER & RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Aspen Jewish Center ↗
  • Who funds CLARION PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds FLORIDA POODLE RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Aspen Cycling Club Inc ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT NEW BORN INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSS CREEK VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Blank Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Blank Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Jackson Health Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
  • South Florida Pbs Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Blank Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Blank Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Blank’s filings →

More from the funding graph