· Public charity
Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation Inc
Black lives matter global network foundation ("blmgnf") is working inside and outside of the system to heal the past, re-imagine the present, and invest in the future of black lives through policy change, investment in our communities, and a commitment to arts and culture.black lives matter global network foundation imagines a world…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
- $250k+3 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OAKLAND & THE WORLD ENTERPRISES INC | $1,000,000 |
| HIGHER HEIGHTS HOME CARE INC | $740,000 |
| LOVE NOT BLOOD CAMPAIGN | $702,500 |
| NATIONAL BLACK JUSTICE COALITION ACTION FUND INC | $60,000 |
| WAYFINDER FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $4.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -21% since the first grant, against -27% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LNLOVE NOT BLOOD CAMPAIGN4× · 2021–2024 · $2.7M · revenue -21% · 79% of their budget
- MOMichael OD Brown We Love Our Sons and Daughters2× · 2021–2022 · $1.5M · revenue -98%
- HHHIGHER HEIGHTS HOME CARE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $920k · revenue +2% · 72% of their budget
Funded once
- LTLIVING THROUGH GIVING FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $2.3M · revenue -47% · 75% of their budget
- TBTEAM BLACKBIRD LLCone grant, 2021 · $1.5M
ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INCone grant, 2021 · $900k · revenue -50%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…
We prioritize the needs of Black people through two programs: Disability Justice and Reproductive Justice. We believe that supporting mental healthcare, holding and creating space for vulnerability is a piece of how we free ourselves as…
Connecting and amplifying the power of individuals to build a just, equitable, and inclusive city.
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Serve as a partner, educator, and guide for philanthropy in reimagining practices that advance a thriving and just world.
The organization provides public education on the issues related to fair and just immigration policies.
Black in Action Collective exists to build Black political power to transform systems and radically reimagine what is possible for ourselves, our families, and our communities
The Black Organizing Project is a Black, member-led community organization working for racial, social, and economic justice through grassroots organizing and community building across the Bay Area.
The Organization is a political hub focused on the dynamic possibilities of galvanizing the social and political power of Black women, girls, and gender-expansive people towards liberation.
The Caribbean Equality Project is an NYC-based community organization that empowers, advocates for, and represents Afro and Indo-Caribbean LGBTQ+ immigrants in New York City.
Action to advance and expand racial justice, gender equality and all human rights.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Trayvon Martin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 8% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOVE NOT BLOOD CAMPAIGN ↗
- Who funds LIVING THROUGH GIVING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Michael OD Brown We Love Our Sons and Daughters ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND & THE WORLD ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHER HEIGHTS HOME CARE INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR BLACK POWER ↗
- Who funds Center for Third World Organizing ↗
- Who funds SOUTH BEND BLACK EMPOWERMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Memphis Artists for Change ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES UNLIMITED INC ↗
- Who funds BUILDING AUDACITY ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PEACE & JUSTICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOOD CHAIN WORKERS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ONE LOVE GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds CANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds ST JAMES INFIRMARY ↗
- Who funds TAMIR RICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Transgender Advocates Knowledgeable Empowering ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN LEAGUE OF METROPOLITAN ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds The Trayvon Martin Foundation ↗
- Who funds EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF NEW AMERICANS ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PEER SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds GEORGE FLOYD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION GEORGE FLOYD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GRIFFIN-GRACY EDUCATIONAL RETREAT & HISTORICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds BYP100 Education Fund ↗
- Who funds THE AUDRE LORDE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds TRANS HOUSING COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST ELMO VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds Transgender Law Center ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Borealis Philanthropy · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Common Counsel Foundation · Tides Foundation · Groundswell Fund · Solidaire Network Inc · Tides Center · Impactassetsinc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Proteus Fund Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Building Audacity — 24% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.