Skip to content

· Private foundation

Birtcher Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$558kReligion$392kEducation$182kFood & Nutrition$95kCivil Rights$65kScience & Tech$30kEnvironment$21kEmployment$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $195k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$25,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEFTHORNSTON EDUCATION FUND$50,000
AFRICA NEW DAY$50,000
OPERATION MOBILIZATION$35,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
TEFTHORNSTON EDUCATION FUND$25,000
LIFE CHILD AFRICA FOUNDATION$25,000
MILELE INT'L$22,049
TEAM EXPANSION$22,000
Individual grant recipient$18,500
HOPE FOR HAITI'S CHILDREN$17,100
Individual grant recipient$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $37k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NILE ORPHAN CARE: $15k → 15%MILELE INT'L: $22k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MA
OR
IN
OH
CA
MO
KY
KS
TN
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 25% of Birtcher Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 71% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 31%.

Birtcher Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 51% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 13 repeat orgs$578k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
20

Total granted

$1.1M
$404k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
0%

Still filing today

62%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $173k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    The Master's Academy International Inc
    5× · 2017–2024 · $199k · revenue +148%
  • TE
    THORNSTON EDUCATIONAL FUND
    4× · 2018–2023 · $150k · revenue +1%
  • RB
    Reaching Beyond Ourselves
    4× · 2018–2021 · $118k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • ND
    New Dawn Communities Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $70k · revenue -23%
  • WC
    WORLD CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $70k · revenue +106%
  • GM
    GLOBAL MISSION
    one grant, 2021 · $31k · revenue -33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Barnabas Leadership Ministries

Ministry

—
2
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
3
Angels in Africa
International
4
One With God

To teach the bible to pastors and church leaders in africa and asia, while funding food for orphaned and abandonded children

Health
5
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
6
African Leadership Initiatives

Christian Training and Education

Religion
7
New Life International Christian Ministry Inc

Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.

Religion
8
Kingdom Investment International Inc

Kingdom Investment works among the poor and oppressed to bear witness to the good news of the Kingdom of God that results in holistic transformation through the power of the Holy Spirit.

Religion
9
Reaching Unreached Nations International

Training, educating, and mobilizing the body of christ to fulfill the mandate of jesus christ to go and make disciples of all nations by establishing bible schools and networks of churches, and providing administrative and logistical…

International
10
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
11
Touch the World Ministries Inc

To seek to proclaim the name of Jesus Christ, to promote Christian principles and the spiritual and physical well being of the world. Major programs include: Orphan ministries, including building orphanages, feeding and educating children,…

Religion
12
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hope Alive Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is International Literacy and Development. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OPERATION MOBILIZATION: $100,000 · OtherOPERATION MOBILIZATIONIndividual grant recipient: $79,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTEFTHORNSTON EDUCATION FUND: $75,000 · OtherTEFTHORNSTON EDUCATION FUNDGRACE CHURCH: $70,544 · OtherGRACE CHURCHWORLD CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC: $70,000 · OtherWORLD CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INCHOPE FOR HAITI'S CHILDREN: $47,100 · OtherHOPE FOR HAITI'S CHILDRENGRACE CHURCH OF NAPA VALLEY: $35,905 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · Other+14 more: $192,376 · Other+14 moreAfrica New Day Inc: $135,778 · InternationalAfrica New Day IncReaching Beyond Ourselves: $118,431 · InternationalReaching Beyond OurselvesNew Dawn Communities Inc: $70,000 · InternationalNew Dawn Communities IncLife Child Africa Foundation: $56,112 · InternationalLife Child Africa FoundationCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $17,500 · International+2 more: $21,368 · InternationalThe Master's Academy International Inc: $199,000 · ReligionThe Master's Academy…Pioneer Bible Translators: $57,494 · ReligionPioneer Bible Transl…GLOBAL MISSION: $31,250 · ReligionGLOBAL MISSIONEpic International Corporation: $13,500 · ReligionTHORNSTON EDUCATIONAL FUND: $150,000 · EducationTHORNSTON E…AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $23,000 · EducationAFRICA NEW …MILELE INTERNATIONAL: $22,049 · Human ServicesNILE ORPHAN CARE INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $23,000 · Crime & LegalHOPE ALIVE INCORPORATED: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$699,925International$419,189Religion$301,244Education$173,000Human Services$37,049Crime & Legal$23,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Master's Academy International Inc: $199,000 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetTHORNSTON EDUCATIONAL FUND: $150,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetAfrica New Day Inc: $135,778 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetReaching Beyond Ourselves: $118,431 over 4y, 21% of budgetPioneer Bible Translators: $57,494 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLife Child Africa Foundation: $56,112 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetGLOBAL MISSION: $31,250 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetRAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC: $23,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL: $23,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND: $17,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNILE ORPHAN CARE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budgetEpic International Corporation: $13,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Literacy and Development: $12,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MAILBOX CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE ALIVE INCORPORATED: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCROSSING BOUNDARIES INC: $8,868 over 1y, 7.3% of budgetFREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHaiti Empowered Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Master's Academy International Inc ↗
  • Who funds THORNSTON EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds Africa New Day Inc ↗
  • Who funds Reaching Beyond Ourselves ↗
  • Who funds New Dawn Communities Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CHRISTIAN OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds Pioneer Bible Translators ↗
  • Who funds Life Child Africa Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds RAPHA HOUSE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds AFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds MILELE INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HUNGER FUND ↗
  • Who funds NILE ORPHAN CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds Epic International Corporation ↗
  • Who funds International Literacy and Development ↗
  • Who funds THE MAILBOX CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ALIVE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CROSSING BOUNDARIES INC ↗
  • Who funds FREE WHEELCHAIR MISSION ↗
  • Who funds Haiti Empowered Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA14.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Servant Foundation · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Edward Jones Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Birtcher Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Birtcher Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Birtcher Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Birtcher Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Birtcher Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph