Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bill Jennie & Harry Ackerman Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$350k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$196k
Largest
01What you fund
0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202024.

Crime & Legal$1.1MHuman Services$123kPhilanthropy$112kArts & Culture$36kReligion$17kEducation$4kOther$327k
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $196k
$8,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRO BONO LEAGAL SERVICES INC$196,485
JCC HOUSING CORP$35,000
JEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION$30,000
GIRLS ON THE RUN INC$15,000
THE CHARIS CIRCLE INC$15,000
CHARLESTON JEWISH FEDERATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLE$8,000
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$5,000
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$5,000
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER$3,000
CHARLESTON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$3,000
YASCHIK-ARNOLD JEWISH STUDIES CENTER$2,500
BNAI BRITH INTERNATIONAL$2,000
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $123k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 49% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%THE CHARIS CIRCLE INC: $15k → 14%THE CHARIS CIRCLE INC: $15k → 14%THE CHARIS CIRCLE INC: $10k → 14%THE CHARIS CIRCLE INC: $10k → 14%THE CHARIS CIRCLE INC: $10k → 14%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLE: $15k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLE: $15k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLE: $10k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLE: $10k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES OF GREATER CHARLE: $8k → 12%WINGS FOR KIDS: $2k → 12%WINGS FOR KIDS: $2k → 12%WINGS FOR KIDS: $2k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 22 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
4

Total granted

$1.6M
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
0%

Still filing today

59%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalArts & CultureReligionEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +90% · 33% of their budget
  • JH
    JCC HOUSING CORPORATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $105k · revenue +52%
  • TC
    THE CHARIS CIRCLE INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHABAD OF CHARLESTON INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • YO
    YMCA OF GREATER CHARLESTON
    one grant, 2020 · $2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Community Center of Charleston Sc

The jewish community center of charleston is a nonprofit for the purpose of providing educational, recreational, social and cultural activities for the jewish community in the charleston area.

2
Holocaust Center for Humanity

The Holocaust Center for Humanity teaches the lessons of the Holocaust, inspiring students of all ages to confront bigotry and indifference, promote human dignity, and take action.

3
Chabad of Columbia University

To educate jewish students based on chabad chassidic philosophy, advance their understanding of jewish ideas and foster their jewishness.

4
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

5
Jewish Center for Justice

Founded in 2017, the Jewish Center for Justice (JCJ) is a distinguished social justice, education, and leadership development platform that meets each individual where they are in their journey to inspire change. JCJ's mission is to…

Human Services
6
Savannah Jewish Council Inc Dba Savannah Jewish Federation

Charged with raising, collecting and distributing funds, the federation seeks to "advance the welfare of the total jewish community". the federation strongly supports israel and world jewry. additionally, the organization strives to…

Religion
7
North Carolina Hillel Foundation

To empower and inspire north carolina's jewish college students to pursue their own jewish journeys by creating strong communities and transformative experiences.

8
Hebrew College

Promotes excellence in jewish learning & leadership within a pluralistic environment. see sch ohebrew college promotes excellence in jewish learning and leadership within a pluralistic environment of open inquiry, intellectual rigor,…

Education
9
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
10
Center for Heirs' Property Preservation

(See Schedule O)

Crime & Legal
11
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

12
Chabad Jewish Center

The Organization operates an religious outreach center to promote and understand Judaism and the laws of Kosher.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charleston Jewish Federation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American College of the Building Arts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INC — $1,126,885 · Crime & LegalPRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INC+1 more — $14,000 · Crime & LegalJCC HOUSING CORPORATION — $105,000 · OtherJCC HOUSING CORPORATI…GIRLS ON THE RUN INC — $53,000 · OtherGIRLS ON THE RUN INCPALMETTO PROJECT-HOMELESS TO HOPE — $40,000 · OtherPALMETTO PROJECT-HOME…JEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherJEWISH ENDOWMENT FOUN…Individual grant recipient — $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…YASCHIK-ARNOLD JEWISH STUDIES CENTER — $15,000 · OtherCharleston Habitat for Humanity Inc — $13,500 · OtherLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $12,500 · Other+9 more — $36,000 · Other+9 moreTHE CHARIS CIRCLE INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesJewish Family Services of Greater Charleston Inc — $58,000 · Human ServicesWINGS FOR KIDS — $4,500 · Human ServicesCharleston Jewish Federation Inc — $112,000 · PhilanthropyThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $21,000 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureCHABAD OF CHARLESTON INC — $10,000 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $6,500 · ReligionAMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE BUILDING ARTS — $3,500 · Education
Crime & Legal$1,140,885Other$327,000Human Services$122,500Philanthropy$112,000Arts & Culture$36,000Religion$16,500Education$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INC — $1,126,885 over 5y, 33% of budgetCharleston Jewish Federation Inc — $112,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetJCC HOUSING CORPORATION — $105,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetTHE CHARIS CIRCLE INC — $60,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetJewish Family Services of Greater Charleston Inc — $58,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCharleston Habitat for Humanity Inc — $13,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $6,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS FOR KIDS — $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE BUILDING ARTS — $3,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW BENEVOLENT SOCIETY — $2,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRO BONO LEGAL SERVICES INC
  • Who funds Charleston Jewish Federation Inc
  • Who funds JCC HOUSING CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE CHARIS CIRCLE INC
  • Who funds Jewish Family Services of Greater Charleston Inc
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds Charleston Habitat for Humanity Inc
  • Who funds LOWCOUNTRY FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds CHABAD OF CHARLESTON INC
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
  • Who funds WINGS FOR KIDS
  • Who funds AMERICAN COLLEGE OF THE BUILDING ARTS
  • Who funds HEBREW BENEVOLENT SOCIETY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation IncSC17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Henry & Sylvia Yaschik Foundation Inc · Coastal Community Foundation of South Carolina Inc · The Sherman Family Charitable Trust · Trident United Way · The Joanna Foundation · The Leon Levine Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bill Jennie & Harry Ackerman Foundation Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bill Jennie & Harry Ackerman Foundation Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Bill Jennie & Harry Ackerman Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph