Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bill and Nancy Cohlmia Family Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2021
9
Grants FY2021
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0178% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Religion$47kHuman Services$21kEducation$3kHealth$2kFood & Nutrition$500Other$0
02FY2021 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ST GEORGE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CATHED$4,100
THE TREEHOUSE$2,000
RENE MOAWAD FOUNDATION$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
GIVING THE BASICS$500
YMCA$500
WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME$500
KANSAS FOOD BANK$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE TREEHOUSE: $2k → 16%THE TREEHOUSE: $2k → 16%THE TREEHOUSE: $2k → 16%THE TREEHOUSE: $2k → 16%THE TREEHOUSE: $2k → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $500 → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $500 → 16%GREATER WICHITA YMCA: $500 → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $2k → 16%WICHITA CHILDRENS HOME: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$68k · 6 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 2 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$68k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+141%

Still filing today

67%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TREEHOUSE INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $10k · revenue +92%
  • TW
    THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME
    2× · 2020–2021 · $2k · revenue +43%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311)
    3× · 2017–2020 · $2k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • CT
    CHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue +33%
  • WC
    WICHITA CANCER FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $1k · revenue +184%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas City Christian School Association

To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.

—
2
Wichitas Littlest Heroes

Wichita's littlest heroes (wlh) exists to provide hope, help, and happiness to families of children ages 0-18 in the kansas area who are battling life-threatening medical conditions. wlh strives to accomplish this be being a physical and…

Human Services
3
Wichita Montessori School Inc

We seek to provide a superior educational experience for children ages 3 to 11, utilizing the montessori methods of teaching and learning. we address the intellectual, emotional, physical and social growth of each child.

—
4
Whitefield Academy Association

The mission of whitefield academy is to support parents by providing students with a top-tier academic foundation in a joyful, christ-centered community of classical learning.

Education
5
Kansas Insurance & Financial Services Education Foundation
Education
6
Wichita Collegiate School

We exist to inspire all students to be the best versions of themselves through a transformative education grounded in academic excellence within our inclusive community.

Education
7
Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies

Out vision is: all communities across kansas value and support a high-quality early childhood care and education system.

Environment
8
Kansas Action for Children Inc

Kansas action for children, inc. is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to shaping health, education and economic policy that improves the lives of kansas children and their families.

Human Services
9
Kansas Chapter American Academy of Pediatrics Inc

Ensuring that all children and youth can reach their full potential for physical, mental, emotional, and social health, growing up safe, strong, and with confidence in the future.

Education
10
Kansas Children's Discovery Center Inc

The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.

Arts & Culture
11
Child Care Inc

To protect children and strengthen families through early education, child care and social services.

Human Services
12
Kansas Children's Service League Foundation

To protect and promote the well-being of children by providing ongoing support of the charitable mission of the kansas children's service league.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Children's Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Phillips Fundamental Learning Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST GEORGE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CATHED: $43,600 · OtherST GEORGE ORTHODOX CHRISTIAN CATHEDIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+10 more: $6,500 · Other+10 moreTHE TREEHOUSE INC: $9,500 · Human ServicesTHE TREEHOUSE INCTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE WICHITA CHILD…THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311): $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S C…KANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $6,500 · HealthCHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC: $2,000 · EducationWICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,000 · EducationKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$60,100Human Services$13,000Health$6,500Education$4,000Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TREEHOUSE INC: $9,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetKANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311): $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIVING THE BASICS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TREEHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE WICHITA CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds CHRIST THE SAVIOR ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA KANSAS (2311) ↗
  • Who funds WICHITA CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PHILLIPS FUNDAMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS FOODBANK WAREHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Fidelity Bank FoundationKS15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Fidelity Bank Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The David and Debbi Elkouri Foundation · Laham Family Foundation · Dwane L and Velma Lunt Wallace Charitable Foundation · Ima Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bill and Nancy Cohlmia Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bill and Nancy Cohlmia Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2022) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bill and Nancy Cohlmia Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph