Skip to content

· Private foundation

Biff Ruttenberg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$96k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$921kHealth$203kPhilanthropy$185kScience & Tech$101kArts & Culture$56kCivil Rights$36kReligion$26kHuman Services$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $96k
$1,826
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRANCIS W PARKER SCHOOL$96,137
Individual grant recipient$5,966
US HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$4,913
JEWISH UNITED FUND$4,913
ANSHE EMET SYNAGOGUE$4,081
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$1,827
SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER$1,826
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$1,826
CHICAGO LOOP SYNAGOGUE$531
NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$515
MAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO$500
ARK THE$360
CONGREGATION BETH SHALOM$360
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $5k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $5k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 21 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$1.6M
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+43%

Still filing today

48%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $360 went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHealthCivil RightsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FW
    Francis W Parker School
    4× · 2021–2024 · $800k · revenue +31%
  • JU
    JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
    4× · 2021–2024 · $182k · revenue +33%
  • SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +43%
  • THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $500 · revenue -15%
  • PE
    PATIENT EMPOWERMENT NETWORKgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $500 · revenue +38%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
4
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Museum of Jewish Heritage a Living Memorial to the Holocaust

The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.

Arts & Culture
7
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
8
National Center for Jewish Filminc

The national center for jewish film is a unique, independent nonprofit motion picture archive, distributor, resource center and exhibitor. ncjf's ongoing mission is the collection, preservation and exhibition of films with artistic and…

Arts & Culture
9
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
10
Yivo Institute for Jewish Research Inc

Yivo's mission is to study the thousand-year history of jewish life in eastern europe and russia in all its aspects: language, history, religion, folkways and material culture. yivo's archive and library preserves a significant collection…

Religion
11
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
12
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Simon Wiesenthal Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Foundation Fighting Blindness Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
12/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Francis W Parker School: $799,522 · EducationFrancis W Parker School+3 more: $3,780 · EducationIndividual grant recipient: $117,010 · OtherIndividual grant rec…VANDERBILT UNIV-LARRY ADELMAN MEMORITAL RESEARCH FUND: $101,000 · OtherVANDERBILT UNIV-LARR…Individual grant recipient: $23,995 · OtherIndividual grant rec…ANSHE EMET SYNAGOGUE: $13,998 · Other+16 more: $25,500 · Other+16 moreELLISON INSTITUTE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthELLISON INSTIT…+1 more: $500 · HealthJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $182,133 · PhilanthropyJEWISH UNITED…MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $30,700 · Arts & CultureSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $24,826 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $19,923 · Arts & CultureCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $15,000 · Human ServicesANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $7,195 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $4,326 · Civil Rights
Education$803,302Other$281,503Health$200,500Philanthropy$182,133Arts & Culture$75,449Human Services$15,000Civil Rights$11,521

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFrancis W Parker School: $799,522 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetELLISON INSTITUTE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $182,133 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART: $30,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $24,826 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $19,923 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $7,195 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $4,326 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC: $1,860 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATIENT EMPOWERMENT NETWORK: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUS GIORDANO'S JAZZ DANCE CHICAGO INC D/B/A GIORDANO DANCE CHICAGO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANA-FARBER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZETA BETA TAU FOUNDATION INC: $280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Francis W Parker School ↗
  • Who funds ELLISON INSTITUTE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART ↗
  • Who funds SIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds MAOT CHITIM OF GREATER CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION FIGHTING BLINDNESS INC ↗
  • Who funds PATIENT EMPOWERMENT NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds GUS GIORDANO'S JAZZ DANCE CHICAGO INC D/B/A GIORDANO DANCE CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds DANA-FARBER INC ↗
  • Who funds ZETA BETA TAU FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Jarvis Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Biff Ruttenberg Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Biff Ruttenberg Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Biff Ruttenberg Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Biff Ruttenberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Biff Ruttenberg’s filings →

    More from the funding graph