Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Beverly M Folger Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$192k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Public Safety & Disaster$451kHealth$330kArts & Culture$103kHuman Services$79kFood & Nutrition$75kEducation$60kRecreation & Sports$55kReligion$34kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $165k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA CHAPTER$35,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA CHAPTER$34,450
AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA CHAPTER$25,000
CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$25,000
MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST$10,000
USET FOUNDATION$10,000
SAN FRANCISCO OPERA GUILD$5,000
FAMILY HOUSE INC$5,000
CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND$5,000
SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL$5,000
SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY$5,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $30k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $30k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $30k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $30k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $21k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 23% of Beverly M Folger Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 71% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Beverly M Folger Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 13 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
6

Total granted

$1.2M
$50k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+18%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $325k · revenue +112%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    4× · 2020–2024 · $196k · revenue +38%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $79k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF HUDDARD WUNDERLICH
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • FP
    FMES PTOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +179%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Symphony San Jose

To provide orchestral music performances, educational services, and arts advocacy programs to the greater silicon valley region.

Arts & Culture
3
The San Francisco School

A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.

4
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
5
Marin Theatre Company

Marin theatre company is the bay area's premier mid-size theater and the leading professional theater in the north bay. mtc produces a six-show season of provocative plays by passionate playwrights from the 20th century and today in an…

Arts & Culture
6
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
7
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
8
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
9
Berkeley Symphony Orchestra

The mission of berkeley symphony is to celebrate our unique and diverse community through music-creating live performances and educational programs to engage the curiosity, spirit, and intellect of our audiences.

Arts & Culture
10
San Francisco Ballet Endowment Foundation

The san francisco ballet endowment foundation was established in 1980 and in 1981 made its first distribution to the san francisco ballet association (the association), a california nonprofit public benefit corporation. (see schedule o)…

Arts & Culture
11
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
12
San Francisco Film Society

SFFILM is a nonprofit organization whose mission ensures independent voices in film are welcomed, heard, and given the resources to thrive. SFFILM connects and inspires audiences, students and teachers, and filmmakers through our film…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Francisco Symphony and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Huddart & Wunderlich Parks. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA CHAPTER — $249,950 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS BAY AREA CHAPTERTHE SALVATION ARMY — $79,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $34,000 · OtherST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCHBENEDICTINE FATHERS OF THE PRIORY — $30,000 · OtherBENEDICTINE FATHERS OF THE PRIORYUSET FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherUSET FOUNDATION+4 more — $20,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $325,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CEN…+1 more — $5,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $196,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National …SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $79,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANC…Smuin Ballet — $13,500 · Arts & CultureSmuin Bal…San Francisco Performances Inc — $5,000 · Arts & CultureMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST — $60,000 · Food & NutritionCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $15,000 · Food & NutritionUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $25,000 · InternationalSANTA CATALINA SCHOOL — $20,000 · EducationFMES PTO — $5,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF HUDDART & WUNDERLICH PARKS — $20,000 · Environment
Other$442,950Health$330,000Human Services$196,000Arts & Culture$97,500Food & Nutrition$75,000International$25,000Education$25,000Environment$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $325,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $196,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY — $79,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST — $60,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CATALINA SCHOOL — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF HUDDART & WUNDERLICH PARKS — $20,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetCHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSmuin Ballet — $13,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA GUILD AT THE WAR MEMORIAL OPERA HOUSE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFMES PTO — $5,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetSan Francisco Performances Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO SYMPHONY
  • Who funds MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF
  • Who funds SANTA CATALINA SCHOOL
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF HUDDART & WUNDERLICH PARKS
  • Who funds CHRONICLE SEASON OF SHARING FUND
  • Who funds Smuin Ballet
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA GUILD AT THE WAR MEMORIAL OPERA HOUSE
  • Who funds FMES PTO
  • Who funds San Francisco Performances Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The David and Lucile Packard FoundationCA13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Beverly M Folger Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Beverly M Folger Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Beverly M Folger Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph