Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

San Francisco Performances Inc

San Francisco Performances Inc (California) receives grants from 42 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,836,945 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($630,000). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$2.9M
Funders on record
42
Grants received
$2.8M
Net assets
$5.8M
24/42 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 26%
01What it does

What San Francisco Performances Inc does

Mission

SFP presents internationally acclaimed and emerging performing artists, introduces innovative programs, and builds new and diversified audiences for the arts through education and outreach activities.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. mainstage performances and education programs---------------------------------------------San Francisco Performances has grown from a first season in 198081 of seven performances to its current season of over 200 memorable performances and programs by some of the world's most exceptional artists.San Francisco Performances has led the way in presenting todays great artists in solo recitals, most often in the intimate acoustics of Herbst Theatre, giving audiences the up-close and personal experience for which we are well known.Artists whom San Francisco Performances has introduced in San Francisco recital

    $1,880,122 spent$510,676 earned by the program
    100% of program spending
  2. debuts include cellist Yo-Yo Ma, violinist Anne-Sophie Mutter, pianists Evgeny Kissin, Andrs Schiff, Mitsuko Uchida and Ivo Pogorelich, soprano Dawn Upshaw,violinist Gidon Kremer, violist Yuri Bashmet, and bassist Edgar Meyer, to name just a few. Important San Francisco debuts in dance include the Paul Taylor Dance Company, Ballet Preljocaj from France, Sweden's Cullberg Ballet and Batsheva from Israel.The unique multi-year Artists-in-Residence programs sustain an ongoing presence in various Bay Area communities. The Alexander String Quartet -for nearly three decades our String Quartet-in-Residence in association with San Francisco State University -established innovative chamber music studies for high school students and created an inspiring Saturday morning series with lectures by Robert Greenberg for adults.

  3. FOR NEARLY TWO DECADES, RESIDENT ARTIST PROGRAMS IN JAZZ, GUITAR, DANCE, VOCAL, ANDMUSIC COMPOSITION CONTINUE AND THRIVE WITH EDUCATION PROGRAMS FOR PUBLIC SCHOOL STUDENTS, FAMILIES, AND ADULTS.In 35 years we have presented hundreds of acclaimed and emerging touring artists in classical chamber music and recitals, contemporary dance and jazz to complement the Bay Areas own live performing arts.

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,880,122.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($3.2M) Expenses 100 ($3.2M) Net assets 100 ($6.9M)2018 Revenue 95 ($3.0M) Expenses 94 ($3.0M) Net assets 102 ($7.0M)2019 Revenue 72 ($2.3M) Expenses 91 ($3.0M) Net assets 92 ($6.3M)2020 Revenue 77 ($2.4M) Expenses 80 ($2.6M) Net assets 91 ($6.3M)2021 Revenue 54 ($1.7M) Expenses 58 ($1.9M) Net assets 103 ($7.1M)2022 Revenue 78 ($2.5M) Expenses 85 ($2.8M) Net assets 89 ($6.1M)2023 Revenue 75 ($2.4M) Expenses 75 ($2.4M) Net assets 92 ($6.3M)2024 Revenue 47 ($1.5M) Expenses 75 ($2.4M) Net assets 89 ($6.1M)2025 Revenue 91 ($2.9M) Expenses 76 ($2.5M) Net assets 85 ($5.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (91)Expenses (76)Net assets (85)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $8.1M to $7.0M (−13%).

$7.3M
$7.4M
$7.6M
$7.3M
$8.1M
$7.0M
$7.6M
$7.7M
$7.2M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 5% · 2018 6% · 2019 8% · 2020 8% · 2021 22% · 2022 20% · 2023 6% · 2024 8% · 2025 4%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

39% of San Francisco Performances Inc’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (63% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 5,377 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 8 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

−$76k
’17
−$46k
’18
−$669k
’19
−$146k
’20
−$155k
’21
−$295k
’22
−$58k
’23
−$946k
’24
$420k
’25
9.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Board chair

Neil H O'Donnell

Board Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed232324231919151718
Joined·+1+5+1+2+0+2+2+3
No longer listed·14260602
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 14 funders to 17 funders, grant income rose $316k → $317k.

10 of 42 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 31% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of San Francisco Performances Inc’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 42 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

San Francisco Performances Inc has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 22% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

31% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund San Francisco Performances Inc.

22%
largest funder
48%
top three
~9
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 33% · 2018 44% · 2019 70% · 2020 24% · 2021 24% · 2022 21% · 2023 20% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of San Francisco Performances Inc's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 57% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

95% of San Francisco Performances Inc's grant income comes from California funders.

IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
DE
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $865k arriving through sponsors registered in 7 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

San Francisco Performances Inc holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 3,230 arts & culture nonprofits its size.

Operating margin15% · above the median
Months of reserve9.7mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 3,230 arts & culture nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025

Government funding San Francisco Performances Inc receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $192k on record.

Federal$192k
grants $192kcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • National Endowment for the Arts$192k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like San Francisco Performances Inc

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 11%Fundraising 12%

Governance

16
board members
94%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

56%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for San Francisco Performances Inc: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds San Francisco Performances Inc?
San Francisco Performances Inc (California) receives grants from 42 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,836,945 to it, the largest being THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION ($630,000). 24 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does San Francisco Performances Inc have?
IRS filings report 42 organizations giving $2,836,945 in grants to San Francisco Performances Inc, 24 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of San Francisco Performances Inc?
THE WILLIAM & FLORA HEWLETT FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $630,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like San Francisco Performances Inc find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds San Francisco Performances →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 42 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing