Skip to content
Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit Corporation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

The primary mission is supporting Christian exhibitions, committed to the well-being and spiritual renewal of community center people, human social services, public education and outreach, training and sending those dedicated to mobilizing disciples of Jesus and the Christian church.

$488k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$212kReligion$185kInternational$142kHuman Services$52kArts & Culture$34kEnvironment$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $229,506, the rows itemized in this filing. The $487,624 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $258,118 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $160k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$15,625
Median grant
6
States reached
$345k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lancaster Bible College$69,725
Chinese Faith Church$24,000
Sight and Sound Theater$19,878
Individual grant recipient$19,720
Vision for Asia USA$19,500
Friends of Grace Church scho$15,625
Shining Hope International$15,000
Department of Education Stude$13,138
University of Nations Kona$12,920
New Life Christian School$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Luke Services IntL Inc: $23k → 14%LUKE SERVICES INTERNATIONAL: $16k → 14%Luke Services IntL Inc: $14k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
OH
PA
CT
CA
VA
AZ
NC
SC
DC
HI
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$350k · 7 repeat orgs$311k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$350k
$101k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
-4%

Still filing today

86%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HEART OF MERCY INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $77k · revenue +32%
  • LS
    LUKE SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $52k · revenue +1%
  • VF
    VISION FOR ASIA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $31k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GRACE CHURCH SCHOOL BROOKLYN HEIGHTS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -4%
  • CA
    CENTRAL ASIA SHARING AID
    one grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue -96%
  • CC
    CROSS CONNECTING NETWORK
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Asia Us Impact

Religious

Religion
2
Training Pastors International

Training pastors in third world countries

Religion
3
China Partner

Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…

—
4
Vision for Asia

Christian Ministry Activities

Religion
5
Sagos Institute of Preaching and Bible Exposition

The mission of our school can be divided into 4 areas:1.To cultivate students exegesis & preaching of the Scriptures rightly based on truth found in Bible. 2.To edify Bible study talents to teach Bible and lead Bible study as the focus of…

Education
6
North America Bible Institute

North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…

Education
7
Knowing Him Ministries

Christian leadership training in Asia as well as orphanage ministry in Myanmar.To call non-Christians to faith in Christ.To build Christians toward spiritual maturity by providing opportunities for growth in faith and knowledge of the Lord…

Religion
8
Alongside Education Ministries Inc

Pastor training

—
9
Jesus in Vietnam Ministries
Religion
10
Global Gospel Initiative Inc
Religion
11
Christian Ministries International
—
12
G2G Center

Curriculum development and distribution & Christian Leadership Training

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster Bible College; the most unlike its peers is H2OPE Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

money and honey christian fil: $46,794 · Othermoney and honey christian filCHINESE FAITH CHURCH: $24,000 · OtherCHINESE FAITH CHURCHSight and Sound Theater: $19,878 · OtherSight and Sound TheaterIndividual grant recipient: $19,720 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFriends of Grace Church scho: $15,625 · OtherFriends of Grace Church schoShining Hope International: $15,000 · OtherShining Hope InternationalDepartment of Education Stude: $13,138 · OtherDepartment of Education StudeCENTRAL ASIA SHARING AID: $12,000 · OtherCENTRAL ASIA SHARING AIDIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherSIM USA INCORPORATED: $8,250 · OtherFRIENDS OF GRACE: $9,087 · Other+3 more: $18,617 · Other+3 moreTrinity International University: $70,789 · EducationTrinity International Univers…LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $69,725 · EducationLANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $12,920 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KON…NEW LIFE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationNEW LIFE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLLogos Evangelical Seminary: $7,246 · EducationHEART OF MERCY INTERNATIONAL INC: $77,000 · PhilanthropyHEART OF MERCY …FRIENDS OF GRACE CHURCH SCHOOL BROOKLYN HEIGHTS INC: $16,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF GRAC…TEE MOVERS FOR CHINESE CHURCH: $60,716 · Arts & CultureTEE MOVERS…LUKE SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC: $52,130 · Human ServicesLove Fort Wayne Inc: $12,563 · ReligionCROSS CONNECTING NETWORK: $10,000 · ReligionPRECIOUS GIFT MINISTRIES: $7,706 · ReligionShining Hope International: $7,000 · ReligionGLOBAL FELLOWSHIP INC: $5,100 · ReligionVISION FOR ASIA: $30,500 · International
Other$212,109Education$170,680Philanthropy$93,000Arts & Culture$60,716Human Services$52,130Religion$42,369International$30,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART OF MERCY INTERNATIONAL INC: $77,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetTrinity International University: $70,789 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $69,725 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTEE MOVERS FOR CHINESE CHURCH: $60,716 over 2y, 19% of budgetLUKE SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC: $52,130 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetVISION FOR ASIA: $30,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetFRIENDS OF GRACE CHURCH SCHOOL BROOKLYN HEIGHTS INC: $16,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC: $12,920 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLove Fort Wayne Inc: $12,563 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCENTRAL ASIA SHARING AID: $12,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNEW LIFE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCROSS CONNECTING NETWORK: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF GRACE: $9,087 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPRECIOUS GIFT MINISTRIES: $7,706 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetLogos Evangelical Seminary: $7,246 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetShining Hope International: $7,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWithin Reach Global Inc: $5,800 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christian Community F…Natl Christian Charit…American Endowment Fo…Donor Advised Charita…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Christian Community Foundation IncCO13.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit Corporation?

    Find your warmest path to Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home