· Public charity
Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit Corporation
The primary mission is supporting Christian exhibitions, committed to the well-being and spiritual renewal of community center people, human social services, public education and outreach, training and sending those dedicated to mobilizing disciples of Jesus and the Christian church.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $229,506 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $487,624 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $258,118 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k10 grants · $160k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Lancaster Bible College | $69,725 |
| Chinese Faith Church | $24,000 |
| Sight and Sound Theater | $19,878 |
| Individual grant recipient | $19,720 |
| Vision for Asia USA | $19,500 |
| Friends of Grace Church scho | $15,625 |
| Shining Hope International | $15,000 |
| Department of Education Stude | $13,138 |
| University of Nations Kona | $12,920 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| New Life Christian School | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.
7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 8% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HOHEART OF MERCY INTERNATIONAL INC2× · 2021–2022 · $77k · revenue +32%
- LSLUKE SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC3× · 2019–2022 · $52k · revenue +1%
- VFVISION FOR ASIA2× · 2023–2024 · $31k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- FOFRIENDS OF GRACE CHURCH SCHOOL BROOKLYN HEIGHTS INCone grant, 2023 · $16k · revenue -4%
- CACENTRAL ASIA SHARING AIDone grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue -96%
- CCCROSS CONNECTING NETWORKone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious
Training pastors in third world countries
Help churches in china fulfill the great commission through training emerging christian leaders. train leaders in evangelism, evangelistic preaching, pastoral care and leadership through seminaries and bible school in china. distribute…
Christian Ministry Activities
The mission of our school can be divided into 4 areas:1.To cultivate students exegesis & preaching of the Scriptures rightly based on truth found in Bible. 2.To edify Bible study talents to teach Bible and lead Bible study as the focus of…
North America Bible Institute (NABI) is an evangelical graduate school, made up of students who are diverse in both ethnicity and ministry aims -- but united in great love for Jesus and his gospel. As a graduate school, NABI offers them…
Christian leadership training in Asia as well as orphanage ministry in Myanmar.To call non-Christians to faith in Christ.To build Christians toward spiritual maturity by providing opportunities for growth in faith and knowledge of the Lord…
Pastor training
Curriculum development and distribution & Christian Leadership Training
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster Bible College and the most unlike its peers is H2OPE Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HEART OF MERCY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Trinity International University ↗
- Who funds LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds TEE MOVERS FOR CHINESE CHURCH ↗
- Who funds LUKE SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds VISION FOR ASIA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF GRACE CHURCH SCHOOL BROOKLYN HEIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE NATIONS KONA INC ↗
- Who funds Love Fort Wayne Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL ASIA SHARING AID ↗
- Who funds NEW LIFE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CROSS CONNECTING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF GRACE ↗
- Who funds PRECIOUS GIFT MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Logos Evangelical Seminary ↗
- Who funds Shining Hope International ↗
- Who funds Within Reach Global Inc ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christian Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit Corporation?
Find your warmest path to Bethel Renewal Center a Nj Nonprofit Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.