Skip to content
Beth and David Geduld Md Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Beth and David Geduld Md Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$132k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

International$266kPhilanthropy$163kRecreation & Sports$52kReligion$29kHuman Services$23kEducation$5kEnvironment$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$1,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$62,550
JINSA$25,000
WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY$25,000
TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL$10,064
JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS$2,018
JUF$1,800
JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY$1,800
MIAMI JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL$1,200
JNF$1,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC$1,000
HANDS ACROSS THE TABLE$500
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $20k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $2k → 13%GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE FUND FOR CHILDREN INC: $190 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
CA
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$502k · 10 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +28% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$502k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+28%

Still filing today

80%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsReligionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $52k · revenue +14%
  • JA
    Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +269%
  • FF
    Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • HA
    HomeSchool Association of California
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • TW
    THE WINNIPESAUKEE PLAYHOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +12%
  • UN
    UNITED NATIONS WATCH - USAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +67%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
3
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
4
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
5
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
6
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
7
Hillel At the George Washington University Inc

The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…

—
8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

—
10
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
11
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
12
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $129,715 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $100,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICYJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA: $25,000 · InternationalJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICAFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $10,000 · International+1 more: $45 · InternationalBOA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $156,000 · OtherBOA CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDTEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL: $25,064 · OtherTEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL+14 more: $16,800 · Other+14 moreNorthwestern University: $51,800 · Recreation & SportsNorthweste…Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $22,485 · Human Services+1 more: $190 · Human ServicesHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $3,654 · ReligionNEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 · EnvironmentGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $1,385 · PhilanthropyBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $600 · Philanthropy
International$264,760Other$197,864Recreation & Sports$51,800Human Services$22,675Religion$3,654Environment$2,500Philanthropy$1,985

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $129,715 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $51,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc: $22,485 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHomeSchool Association of California: $5,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $3,654 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $1,385 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,256 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINNIPESAUKEE PLAYHOUSE: $1,074 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLake Winnipesaukee Association: $290 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKips Bay Boys & Girls Club: $280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE FUND FOR CHILDREN INC: $190 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $45 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…American Endowment Fo…National Philanthropi…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beth and David Geduld Md Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beth and David Geduld Md Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Beth and David Geduld Md Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home