Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Beth and David Geduld Md Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$132k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212024.

International$266kPhilanthropy$163kRecreation & Sports$52kReligion$29kHuman Services$23kEducation$5kEnvironment$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $63k
$1,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$62,550
WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY$25,000
JINSA$25,000
TEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL$10,064
JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS$2,018
JEWISH FEDERATION OF BROWARD COUNTY$1,800
JUF$1,800
MIAMI JEWISH FILM FESTIVAL$1,200
JNF$1,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC$1,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$500
HANDS ACROSS THE TABLE$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $20k → 13%JEWISH ADOPTION AND FAMILY CARE OPTIONS: $2k → 13%GREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE FUND FOR CHILDREN INC: $190 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
NY
MA
CA
DC
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$502k · 10 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$502k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+13%

Still filing today

80%
91%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsReligionEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    3× · 2021–2023 · $52k · revenue +14%
  • JA
    Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +269%
  • FF
    Foundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc
    2× · 2021–2023 · $10k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • HA
    HomeSchool Association of California
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue 0%
  • TW
    THE WINNIPESAUKEE PLAYHOUSE
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +12%
  • UN
    UNITED NATIONS WATCH - USAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +67%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

2
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

3
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
4
Weizmann Institute of Science

The weizmann institute of science, located in rehovot, israel, is one of the worlds top-ranking, multidisciplinary research institutions. at any one time, several thousand scientists, staff and students are involved in hundreds of research…

Science & Tech
5
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
6
United Israel Appeal Inc

The principal function of uia is to administer and supervise the funds allocated for philanthropic purposes related to immigration and absorption of humanitarian migrants to israel and jewish identity programs in israel and the former…

International
7
Hillel At the George Washington University Inc

The mission of gw hillel is to provide an open, warm, and pluralistic environment in which students can shape their college experience by connecting socially, culturally, and spiritually to their judaism. hillel aims to foster students'…

8
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
9
University of Southern California Hillel Foundation

To create an informed, celebratory and satisfying jewish community for students at the university of southern california, to deepen jewish identity through social, intellectual and spiritual participation, to offer diversified…

10
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
11
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
12
American Friends of Hebrew University Inc

Support the hebrew univ. of jerusalem, israel's foremost center of higher edu. & research.

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Birthright Israel Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $129,715 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $100,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICYJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA — $25,000 · InternationalJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICAFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $10,000 · International+1 more — $45 · InternationalBOA CHARITABLE GIFT FUND — $156,000 · OtherBOA CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDTEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL — $25,064 · OtherTEMPLE B'NAI ISRAEL+14 more — $16,800 · Other+14 moreNorthwestern University — $51,800 · Recreation & SportsNorthweste…Jewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc — $22,485 · Human Services+1 more — $190 · Human ServicesHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $3,654 · ReligionNEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 · EnvironmentGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $1,385 · PhilanthropyBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $600 · Philanthropy
International$264,760Other$197,864Recreation & Sports$51,800Human Services$22,675Religion$3,654Environment$2,500Philanthropy$1,985

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $129,715 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY — $100,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University — $51,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURITY OF AMERICA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJewish Adoption and Family Care Options Inc — $22,485 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFoundation for the Defense of Democracies Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHomeSchool Association of California — $5,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $3,654 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC — $1,385 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,256 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WINNIPESAUKEE PLAYHOUSE — $1,074 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED NATIONS WATCH - USA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLake Winnipesaukee Association — $290 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKips Bay Boys & Girls Club — $280 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER LAKES REGION CHARITABLE FUND FOR CHILDREN INC — $190 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $45 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Beth and David Geduld Md Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph