Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Berti Prough Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Education$2.4MHuman Services$200kHealth$148kCivil Rights$105kScience & Tech$85kEnvironment$50kArts & Culture$30kYouth Development$28kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$50,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$47k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA$50,000
LA PROMISE FUND$50,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $45k → 8%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $22k → 16%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $12k → 8%THE REPRESENTATION PROJECT: $55k → 8%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $17k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO: $25k → 10%EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE: $10k → 17%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $12k → 14%BROWN ANNUAL FUND: $45k → 14%BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA: $50k → 9%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $12k → 8%THE REPRESENTATION PROJECT: $50k → 8%PLUMPJACK FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE: $10k → 17%BROWN ANNUAL FUND: $20k → 14%HARVARD UNIVERSITY: $20k → 8%EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE: $10k → 17%BROWN ANNUAL FUND: $20k → 14%FRIENDS OF KENYA WILDLIFE TRUST: $10k → 8%WILDWOOD SCHOOL: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $69k → 14%WILDWOOD SCHOOL: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $55k → 14%WILDWOOD SCHOOL: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $50k → 14%EVERY WOLF EVERY YEAR: $25k → 14%CHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $25k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $20k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%LA PROMISE FUND: $600k → 14%LA PROMISE FUND: $446k → 14%LA'S PROMISE: $372k → 14%LA PROMISE FUND: $155k → 14%LA PROMISE FUND: $150k → 14%LA PROMISE FUND: $96k → 14%MPTF FOUNDATION: $57k → 14%LA PROMISE FUND: $50k → 14%BRENTWOOD SCHOOL: $10k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%MARLBOROUGH: $15k → 14%DESIRE TO INSPIRE: $10k → 14%ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%ACADEMY MUSEUM: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 13 repeat orgs$298k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
23

Total granted

$2.7M
$248k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+6%

Still filing today

77%
39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentAnimalsCivil RightsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LP
    LA PROMISE FUND
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.9M · revenue +287%
  • WS
    WILDWOOD SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $150k · revenue +33%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    5× · 2018–2023 · $75k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • MF
    MPTF FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $57k
  • University of San Francisco
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue 0%
  • EW
    EVERY WOLF EVERY YEAR
    one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

4
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
8
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
9
La Salle University

See schedule o for complete mission statement.la salle is a lasallian catholic university committed to the principle that all knowledge is practical and empowering, filled with the capacity to transform lives. anchored in the living…

Education
10
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

12
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of San Francisco and the most unlike its peers is Bhpoa Benevolent Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%4%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%35%10–20yr19%22%20–35yr12%13%35–55yr12%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%0%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr19%74%20–35yr12%7%35–55yr12%9%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
14%
11,753/86,963

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LA PROMISE FUND — $1,868,708 · EducationLA PROMISE FUNDWILDWOOD SCHOOL INC — $150,000 · EducationWILDWOOD SCHOOL INCPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $85,000 · Education+6 more — $144,700 · Education+6 moreCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $224,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S COMMUNITY…BROWN ANNUAL FUND — $85,000 · OtherBROWN ANNUAL FUNDMPTF FOUNDATION — $57,200 · OtherMPTF FOUNDATIONEVERY WOLF EVERY YEAR — $25,000 · OtherMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED — $21,668 · OtherUSC — $20,000 · OtherCITY YEAR INC — $20,000 · Other+14 more — $104,666 · Other+14 moreChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $75,000 · HealthTHE PLUMPJACK FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Health+1 more — $1,500 · HealthThe Representation Project — $105,000 · Civil RightsBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $50,000 · AnimalsSTRAY CAT ALLIANCE — $2,000 · AnimalsCOACHARTORG — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentC5 YOUTH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentFILM2FUTURE — $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentACADEMY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$2,248,408Other$557,534Health$106,500Civil Rights$105,000Animals$52,000Youth Development$28,000Arts & Culture$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLA PROMISE FUND — $1,868,708 over 7y, 7.2% of budgetWILDWOOD SCHOOL INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Representation Project — $105,000 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College — $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC — $34,700 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PLUMPJACK FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOACHARTORG — $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $24,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetACADEMY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRENTWOOD SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBHPOA BENEVOLENT FUND — $8,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetC5 YOUTH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTRAY CAT ALLIANCE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILM2FUTURE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCAREMESSAGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LA PROMISE FUND
  • Who funds WILDWOOD SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds The Representation Project
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds BIG LIFE FOUNDATION USA
  • Who funds EDUCATORS FOR EXCELLENCE INC
  • Who funds THE PLUMPJACK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds University of San Francisco
  • Who funds COACHARTORG
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ACADEMY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC
  • Who funds BRENTWOOD SCHOOL
  • Who funds BHPOA BENEVOLENT FUND
  • Who funds SPEE CLUB INC
  • Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds C5 YOUTH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC
  • Who funds STRAY CAT ALLIANCE
  • Who funds TOWER CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FILM2FUTURE
  • Who funds CAREMESSAGE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Annenberg FoundationPA19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Berti Prough Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Berti Prough Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Berti Prough Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph