Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bert N Mitchell Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$115kEducation$73kHuman Services$40kScience & Tech$15kInternational$13kHealth$6kHousing & Shelter$5kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$226k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCHOMBURG CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN BLACK CULTURE$25,000
HUDSON GUILD$10,000
STUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC$5,000
STANFORD UNIVERSITY$5,000
NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HUDSON GUILD: $10k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $10k → 17%HUDSON GUILD: $5k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED: $5k → 17%THE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $250 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$179k · 9 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +23% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
9

Total granted

$179k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+9%

Still filing today

33%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SCHOMBURG CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN BLACK CULTURE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $50k
  • HG
    HUDSON GUILDINC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $25k · revenue +23%
  • TH
    THE HISTORYMAKERS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $25k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • Jack and Jill of America Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +21%
  • N(
    NMAAHC ((NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY)
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR ACCOUNTING EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
2
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
7
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
8
The Partnership for After School Education Inc

The partnership for after school education is a child-focused organization that promotes and supports quality after school programs, particularly those serving young people from underserved communities. the partnership for after school…

Education
9
New York Institute of Technology

New york institute of technology (nyit) offers various degree programs, including undergraduate, graduate, and professional degrees, in more than 50 fields of study, including architecture and design; arts and sciences; (continued on…

Education
10
Workforce Professionals Training Institute

Wpti's mission is to build the capacities of people, programs, and organizations that provide job training, placement, and career guidance for individuals and to advocate for policies that promote economic opportunities for all.

Employment
11
Futures Ignite Inc

We amplify youth and community power by inspiring, guiding, and advocating for youth to determine their college, career, and leadership futures.

Human Services
12
American Academy of Pediatrics

The mission of the american academy of pediatrics is to obtain optimal physical, mental and social health for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. the academy seeks to promote this goal by encouraging and assisting its…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Student Leadership Network Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHOMBURG CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN BLACK CULTURE: $50,000 · OtherSCHOMBURG CENTER FOR RESEARCH IN BLACK CULTUREWIN INC: $15,000 · OtherWIN INCKTHS NY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · OtherKTHS NY ALUMNI ASSOCIATIONSCHOMBURG CENTER FOR RESEARCH: $15,000 · OtherSCHOMBURG CENTER FOR RESEARCHNATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY: $15,000 · OtherNATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORYAMERICAN FOUNDATION UWI: $13,050 · OtherAMERICAN FOUNDATION UWINMAAHC ((NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY): $10,000 · OtherNMAAHC ((NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORY)DAVID L MERCER MEMORIAL SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $200 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $60,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF T…FOUNDATION FOR ACCOUNTING EDUCATION INC: $8,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR ACCOUNTING …HUDSON GUILDINC: $25,000 · Human ServicesHUDSON GUIL…WOMEN IN NEED INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesWOMEN IN NE…+1 more: $250 · Human ServicesTHE HISTORYMAKERS: $25,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HISTO…Jack and Jill of America Foundation Inc: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $1,000 · PhilanthropyCHILDREN'S CANCER AND BLOOD FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · Health
Other$138,250Education$68,000Human Services$30,250Arts & Culture$25,000Youth Development$15,000Philanthropy$6,000Health$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON GUILDINC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HISTORYMAKERS: $25,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJack and Jill of America Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR ACCOUNTING EDUCATION INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER AND BLOOD FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetSTUDENT LEADERSHIP NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER GREENSBORO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMITTEE FOR HISPANIC CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK STATE SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY11× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bert N Mitchell Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bert N Mitchell Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bert N Mitchell Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bert N Mitchell Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bert N Mitchell Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph