Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bernard G Rethore Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$33k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$31kHuman Services$11kEducation$6kPublic Benefit$5kCrime & Legal$4kAnimals$4kInternational$3kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$451k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE BUCKLEY INSTITUTE$8,000
ST PATRICK CATHOLIC COMMUNITY CHURCH$3,500
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$3,300
SAMARITANS PURSE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,200
JUDICIAL WATCH$2,000
LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$1,000
FRANCISCAN RENEWAL CENTER$1,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,000
CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY$1,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
HOLY TRINITY NEWMAN CENTER$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
HALO ANIMAL RESCUE$1,000
PHOENIX RESCUE MISSION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 88% of grant dollars ($75k). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 12% that went abroad ($10k) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
CT
CA
CO
VA
AZ
NC
DC
FL

Beyond the US: 12% of all-years giving ($10k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Italy$10k · 8 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 21 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +50% since the first grant, against +43% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
9

Total granted

$104k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+43%

Still filing today

33%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BI
    BUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $10k · revenue +66%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $7k · revenue +50%
  • PG
    PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION
    5× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • ET
    ELDER TLC INC CO LINDA STANCIU
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE ASHBROOK CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue ×20
  • RD
    RESCUE DOGS ROCK NYC
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
2
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
3
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
4
The Institute for Advanced Catholic Studies

The institute's mission is to conduct research on key issues facing society to help both the church and society deal thoughtfully with the major issues they face globally. the institute also sponsors and conducts research and scholarship…

Religion
5
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
8
The Fund for American Studies

The fund for american studies (tfas) seeks to create a brighter, more prosperous future by preparing young people for leadership and teaching them the ideas of freedom and a free-market economy. founded in 1967, tfas organizes programs for…

—
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
The Institute On Religion and Public Life Inc

The institute on religion and public life is an interreligious, nonpartisan research and educational 501(c)(3) organization. the institute's mission is to articulate a governing consensus that supports: (see schedule o)- a religiously…

—
12
Lincoln Memorial University

Lincoln memorial university is a values-based learning community dedicated to providing educational experiences in the liberal arts and professional studies.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST PATRICK CATHOLIC COMMUNITY CHURCH: $19,450 · OtherST PATRICK CATHOLIC COMMUNITY CHURCHHOLY TRINITY NEWMAN CENTER: $7,000 · OtherHOLY TRINITY NEWMAN CENTERIndividual grant recipient: $6,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJUDICIAL WATCH: $6,000 · OtherJUDICIAL WATCHELDER TLC INC CO LINDA STANCIU: $5,000 · OtherELDER TLC INC CO LINDA STANCIUIndividual grant recipient: $4,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFIDELITY FOREX INCASSOCIAZONE CORALE FONTE VETICA: $3,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $3,500 · OtherASSOCIAZIONE CORALE FONTE VETICA: $3,000 · OtherSAINT THOMAS MORE: $3,000 · OtherLEADERSHIP INSTITUTE: $2,750 · Other+13 more: $13,250 · Other+13 moreBUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 · EducationBUCKLEY INSTITUT…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER T…HILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,250 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEG…PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $6,000 · ReligionPHOENIX GO…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY: $3,000 · Crime & LegalAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS: $1,750 · HealthHALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC: $1,000 · Animals
Other$77,650Education$16,750Religion$11,000Human Services$6,500Crime & Legal$3,000Health$1,750Animals$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ASHBROOK CENTER: $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS: $1,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Humane Studies: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BUCKLEY INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR AMERICAN LIBERTY ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ASHBROOK CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMANDA HOPE RAINBOW ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HALO HELPING ANIMALS LIVE ON INC ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bradley Impact Fund IncWI13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bradley Impact Fund Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bernard G Rethore Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bernard G Rethore Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bernard G Rethore Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph