Skip to content

· Private foundation

Berman Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$356kEducation$331kReligion$214kHealth$190kFood & Nutrition$166kArts & Culture$78kCrime & Legal$55kYouth Development$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $125k
$7,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$18,000
CASA OF THE CHEAHA REGION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
ARC OF CALHOUN COUNTY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
THE YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WEST END COMMUNITY CHURCH$10,000
PROMISE 686$10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$10,000
COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER$8,000
THE WELLHOUSE$8,000
ST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CENTER$7,500
ALL SAINTS INTERFAITH CENTER OF CON$7,000
PUBLIC LIBRARY OF ANNISTON$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%BIG OAK RANCH: $3k → 18%COMMUNITIES OF TRANSFORMATION: $6k → 30%PROMISE 686: $20k → 9%BIG OAK RANCH: $2k → 18%PROMISE 686: $14k → 9%BIG OAK RANCH: $1k → 18%PROMISE 686: $13k → 9%PROMISE 686: $13k → 9%PROMISE 686: $10k → 9%PROMISE 686: $5k → 9%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $10k → 19%THE YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $10k → 19%THE YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $10k → 19%THE YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $8k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $8k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $7k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $6k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $5k → 19%THE YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
VA
MD
TN
NC
AL
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Berman Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in AL; by stated purpose, 88%.

Berman Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 39 repeat orgs$319k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
31

Total granted

$1.3M
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+5%

Still filing today

28%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsHousing & ShelterEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    Promise686 Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +190%
  • AS
    ANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +36%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY FOUND OF BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2018 · $64k
  • CC
    CLEBURNE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • CC
    CALHOUN COUNTY TECH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Macomb County Humane Society

Provide care for homeless/abused animals

Animals
2
Community Food Bank of Central Alabama

To feed people in need today and foster collaborative solutions to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
3
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
4
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
5
Champaign County Animal Welfare League Inc

To provide a refuge for unwanted and/or abandoned dogs and cats, provide pet adoption, pet trainng, neutering and medical treatment, and rehabilitation, with no euthanization unless in the case of incurable illness.

Animals
6
Welcome House Inc

Welcome house provides a continuum of services to end homelessness and promote stability for each person we serve.

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

—
8
Christian Service Center Inc

Service to low income and homeless

Human Services
9
Southern States Bully Rescue Inc

Shelter abused, abandoned, neglected, injured & homeless animals

Animals
10
Church On Wheels Inc

To serve the homeless and the impoverished population with nourishing meals, warm showers, and a compassionate environment.

Religion
11
Community Action Agency of Southern New Mexico Inc

Caasnm is a 60 year-old new mexico statewide health and social services not for profit with a mission of uplifting low-income families by connecting communities, encouraging family wellness, empowering families, and bridging resources.

Human Services
12
Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Ministries Inc of Calhoun County; the most unlike its peers is Communities of Transformation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ARC OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $131,000 · OtherARC OF CALHOUN COUNTYWHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOL: $128,500 · OtherWHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOLALL SAINTS INTERFAITH CENTER OF CON: $67,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $65,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUND OF BIRMINGHAM: $64,000 · OtherBERMAN MUSEUM OF WORLD HISTORY: $60,000 · OtherCASA OF THE CHEAHA REGION: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $43,000 · Other+55 more: $652,500 · Other+55 morePromise686 Inc: $75,000 · Human ServicesPromise686 …COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC: $46,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY E…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC: $29,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S…COMMUNITIES OF TRANSFORMATION: $6,000 · Human Services+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC: $70,500 · Food & NutritionPIEDMONT BENEVOLENCE CENTER: $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $18,500 · Housing & ShelterFREEDOM FARM INC: $15,000 · Housing & ShelterUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $16,207 · EducationHUB WORLDWIDE INC: $11,500 · InternationalCHEAHA REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · AnimalsSAVING ANIMALS VOLUNTEER EFFORT INC: $5,000 · Animals
Other$1,266,000Human Services$161,500Food & Nutrition$75,500Housing & Shelter$33,500Education$16,207International$11,500Animals$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPromise686 Inc: $75,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC: $70,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC: $46,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC: $29,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WELLHOUSE INC: $18,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC: $16,207 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FARM INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHUB WORLDWIDE INC: $11,500 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetKNOX CONCERT SERIES INC: $7,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetCHEAHA REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAVING ANIMALS VOLUNTEER EFFORT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budget2ND CHANCE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBring Hope Now INC: $4,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetST ANDREW'S-SEWANEE SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Promise686 Inc ↗
  • Who funds ANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WELLHOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LEAGUE FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds HUB WORLDWIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL24.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · United Way of East Central Alabama Inc · Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Berman Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Berman Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Berman Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Berman Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Berman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph