Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Berman Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$356kEducation$331kReligion$214kHealth$190kFood & Nutrition$166kArts & Culture$78kCrime & Legal$55kYouth Development$49kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $83k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $125k
$7,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$18,000
ARC OF CALHOUN COUNTY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
CASA OF THE CHEAHA REGION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
WEST END COMMUNITY CHURCH$10,000
THE YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY$10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PROMISE 686$10,000
THE WELLHOUSE$8,000
COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER$8,000
ST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CENTER$7,500
ALL SAINTS INTERFAITH CENTER OF CON$7,000
PUBLIC LIBRARY OF ANNISTON$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 54% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%BIG OAK RANCH: $3k → 18%COMMUNITIES OF TRANSFORMATION: $6k → 30%PROMISE 686: $20k → 9%BIG OAK RANCH: $2k → 18%PROMISE 686: $14k → 9%BIG OAK RANCH: $1k → 18%PROMISE 686: $13k → 9%PROMISE 686: $13k → 9%PROMISE 686: $10k → 9%PROMISE 686: $5k → 9%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $10k → 19%THE YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $10k → 19%THE YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $10k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $8k → 19%THE YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $8k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $7k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $6k → 19%COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPER: $5k → 19%THE YMCA OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $2k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
VA
MD
TN
NC
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Berman Charitable Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in AL; read by stated purpose it is 88% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Berman Charitable Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.7% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 39 repeat orgs$319k to everyone else

39 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
31

Total granted

$1.3M
$270k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+5%

Still filing today

28%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionAnimalsHousing & ShelterEducationInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PI
    Promise686 Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +190%
  • AS
    ANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +36%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TC
    THE COMMUNITY FOUND OF BIRMINGHAM
    one grant, 2018 · $64k
  • CC
    CLEBURNE COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • CC
    CALHOUN COUNTY TECH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Macomb County Humane Society

Provide care for homeless/abused animals

Animals
2
Community Food Bank of Central Alabama

To feed people in need today and foster collaborative solutions to end hunger tomorrow.

Food & Nutrition
3
Western Carolina Rescue Ministries Inc

Provide food, shelter, rehabilitation and christian ministry to the poor and homeless

Housing & Shelter
4
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

5
Champaign County Animal Welfare League Inc

To provide a refuge for unwanted and/or abandoned dogs and cats, provide pet adoption, pet trainng, neutering and medical treatment, and rehabilitation, with no euthanization unless in the case of incurable illness.

Animals
6
Welcome House Inc

Welcome house provides a continuum of services to end homelessness and promote stability for each person we serve.

Housing & Shelter
7
Habitat for Humanity of Baldwin County Inc

Habitat for humanity of baldwin county, inc. is an ecumenical, christian housing ministry that seeks to eliminate poverty housing by partnering with the community to make decent shelter a matter of conscience and action.

8
Christian Service Center Inc

Service to low income and homeless

Human Services
9
Southern States Bully Rescue Inc

Shelter abused, abandoned, neglected, injured & homeless animals

Animals
10
Church On Wheels Inc

To serve the homeless and the impoverished population with nourishing meals, warm showers, and a compassionate environment.

Religion
11
Community Action Agency of Southern New Mexico Inc

Caasnm is a 60 year-old new mexico statewide health and social services not for profit with a mission of uplifting low-income families by connecting communities, encouraging family wellness, empowering families, and bridging resources.

Human Services
12
Chattahoochee Hospice Inc

The organization pledges to provide quality programs, service, and technology to meet the unique physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of the terminally ill and their families, and to educate the community about end of life issues.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Ministries Inc of Calhoun County and the most unlike its peers is Communities of Transformation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild and Family ServicesYmca Community CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionChristian Missionary Organi…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…Veteran Support ServicesFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/21
Grantees still filing
11/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARC OF CALHOUN COUNTY — $131,000 · OtherARC OF CALHOUN COUNTYWHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOL — $128,500 · OtherWHITE PLAINS HIGH SCHOOLALL SAINTS INTERFAITH CENTER OF CON — $67,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherTHE COMMUNITY FOUND OF BIRMINGHAM — $64,000 · OtherBERMAN MUSEUM OF WORLD HISTORY — $60,000 · OtherCASA OF THE CHEAHA REGION — $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $43,000 · Other+55 more — $652,500 · Other+55 morePromise686 Inc — $75,000 · Human ServicesPromise686 …COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC — $46,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY E…YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC — $29,500 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S…COMMUNITIES OF TRANSFORMATION — $6,000 · Human Services+1 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC — $70,500 · Food & NutritionPIEDMONT BENEVOLENCE CENTER — $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE WELLHOUSE INC — $18,500 · Housing & ShelterFREEDOM FARM INC — $15,000 · Housing & ShelterUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $16,207 · EducationHUB WORLDWIDE INC — $11,500 · InternationalSAVING ANIMALS VOLUNTEER EFFORT INC — $5,000 · AnimalsCHEAHA REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 · Animals
Other$1,266,000Human Services$161,500Food & Nutrition$75,500Housing & Shelter$33,500Education$16,207International$11,500Animals$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPromise686 Inc — $75,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC — $70,500 over 8y, 10% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC — $46,000 over 6y, 3.7% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC — $29,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WELLHOUSE INC — $18,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $16,207 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM FARM INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHUB WORLDWIDE INC — $11,500 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S SERVICES INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetKNOX CONCERT SERIES INC — $7,500 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSAVING ANIMALS VOLUNTEER EFFORT INC — $5,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetBIG OAK RANCH INC — $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budget2ND CHANCE INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHEAHA REGIONAL HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetBring Hope Now INC — $4,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetST ANDREW'S-SEWANEE SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWreaths Across America — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Promise686 Inc
  • Who funds ANNISTON SOUP BOWL INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ENABLER DEVELOPERS INC
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF CALHOUN COUNTY INC
  • Who funds THE WELLHOUSE INC
  • Who funds LEAGUE FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC
  • Who funds US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds FREEDOM FARM INC
  • Who funds HUB WORLDWIDE INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alabama Power Foundation IncAL24.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alabama Power Foundation Inc · United Way of East Central Alabama Inc · Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Berman Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Berman Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Berman Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph