Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bengualid Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2018
33
Grants FY2018
5
States reached
$85k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

98% of Bengualid Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year Bengualid Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 17 organizations, $213k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

16
’17
17
’18
5
’19
1
’20
0
’21
0
’22
0
’23
0
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$2.1MReligion$140kInternational$78kSocial Science$51kEducation$41kHealth$21kHuman Services$14kCivil Rights$4kOther$0
02FY2018 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k29 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$1,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Spanish Portuguese Synagogue$84,720
American Committee Weizmann Institu$25,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$21,800
Re'uth$14,450
BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM$5,560
American Friends Of Magen David Ado$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
SAR Scholarship Fund$5,000
Friends of United Hatzalah Israel$5,000
Etzion Foundation Inc$5,000
FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH$4,100
Individual grant recipient$3,600
JBI INTERNATIONAL$3,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS ALLIANCE ISRAELITE$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–19, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Dorot: $3k → 17%Dorot: $1k → 17%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $10k → 17%Dorot: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$310k · 28 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

28 repeat relationships: 25 still active in FY2018, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

28
9

Total granted

$310k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+297%

Still filing today

43%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’25
InternationalEducationHealthReligionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $22k · revenue +39%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    2× · 2017–2018 · $15k · revenue +206%
  • BT
    BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • SZ
    SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • KH
    KEREN HASHANAH FUND
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
5
University of Judaism Foundation
—
6
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
7
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
9
The Jerusalem Connection
—
10
Eastern European Jewish Heritage Foundation
Philanthropy
11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
12
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hebrew Free Loan Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dorot Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $2,120,450 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDSpanish Portuguese Synagogue: $84,720 · OtherSpanish Portug…Re'uth: $67,200 · OtherRe'uthAmerican Committee Weizmann Institu: $50,000 · OtherAmerican Commi…The Congregation Sheareth Israel: $43,245 · OtherThe Congregati…SAR Scholarship Fund: $17,350 · OtherSAR Scholarshi…+27 more: $58,752 · Other+27 moreJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $46,800 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $15,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,600 · InternationalCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $4,500 · International+1 more: $500 · InternationalYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $21,800 · EducationYESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL LTD (FORMERLY THE MEOROT INST): $4,600 · EducationTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · EducationJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $8,500 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $7,700 · HealthUpper East Side Hatzolah Inc: $2,000 · HealthHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesDOROT INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $9,660 · Philanthropy+1 more: $180 · PhilanthropyETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA: $5,000 · ReligionNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $1,000 · Religion
Community Improvement$2,120,450Other$321,267International$75,400Education$27,900Health$18,200Human Services$14,000Philanthropy$9,840Religion$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $2,120,450 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $46,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $21,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $9,660 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $8,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJBI INTERNATIONAL INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $7,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL LTD (FORMERLY THE MEOROT INST): $4,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDOROT INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOL HANEARIM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEPHARDIC PUBLICATION FOUNDATION INC: $75 over 1y, 7.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS TOWN JERUSALEM FOUNDATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds JBI INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC ↗
  • Who funds ETZION FOUNDATION INC co H SILVERA ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT CHOVEVEI TORAH RABBINICAL SCHOOL LTD (FORMERLY THE MEOROT INST) ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE FOR ACCURACY IN MIDDLE EAST REPORTING IN AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEBRA AGUDAS ACHIM CHESED SHEL EMETH HEBREW FREE BURIAL ASSOCIATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds Upper East Side Hatzolah Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY17.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bengualid Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bengualid Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bengualid’s filings →

    More from the funding graph