Skip to content
Benevento and Mayo Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Benevento and Mayo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$201k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$159k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$707kHealth$422kPhilanthropy$113kCrime & Legal$75kHuman Services$52kReligion$48kFood & Nutrition$44kPublic Safety & Disaster$36kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $159k
$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PARENTE FAMILY CHARITABLE FUND CO FIDELITY$158,500
CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING$10,000
FORK OVER LOVE$10,000
SOUTHHAMPTON DAY CARE CENTER$7,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NAVITY MIGUEL SCRANTON$3,000
NORTHEAST BOYSCOUTS OF AMERICA$1,500
FM KIRBY CENTER$1,500
BACK MOUNTAIN POLICE ASSOCIATION$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY$1,000
WYOMING SEMINARY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SOUTHHAMPTON DAY CARE CENTER: $10k → 7%MERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $9k → 20%SOUTHHAMPTON DAY CARE CENTER: $8k → 7%MERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER: $5k → 20%SOUTHHAMPTON DAY CARE CENTER: $8k → 7%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF SCRANTON: $10k → 13%CANDYS PLACE: $5k → 15%CANDYS PLACE: $3k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $20k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $10k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $8k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $7k → 15%CASA OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 24 repeat orgs$244k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
18

Total granted

$1.5M
$83k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+25%

Still filing today

63%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 20% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GEISINGER HEALTH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $253k · revenue +118%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $62k · revenue +150%
  • WV
    WYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2017–2024 · $61k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • WR
    WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • AC
    ALLONE CHARITIES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CW
    CEO WEINBERG FOOD BANK
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Keystone Hospice

Providing comprehensive home-based and facility based hospice care to children and adults with life limiting and life threatening illnesses in southeastern pennsylvania. in addition, keystone hospice provides residential care through…

Human Services
2
Pocono Health System

We heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
3
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
4
Northeastern Pennsylvania Health Care Foundation
Education
5
Monongahela Valley Hospital Inc

The mission of penn highlands mon valley is to enhance the health of the residents of the mid-monongahela valley area by providing outstanding healthcare services.

Health
6
Upmc Williamsport

UPMC Williamsport is a subsidiary of UPMC Susquehanna. The mission of UPMC Susquehanna and its subsidiaries is to serve the community by providing outstanding patient care and shaping tomorrow's health care through clinical and…

Health
7
Keystone Care

Providing administrative services to its two subsidiaries, keystone hospice and keystone home health, llc. providing social services to medically fragile populations in southeastern pennsylvania.

Health
8
Lehigh Valley Health Network

We heal, comfort, and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value supported by education and clinical research.

—
9
Penn State Health Hampden Medical Center

Penn state health hampden medical center's mission is to continually improve the health and well-being of the people in pennsylvania. the organization provides patients with excellent, compassionate and culturally responsive and equitable…

Health
10
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
11
Chester County Hospital & Health System

The provision of management services to the chester county hospital and its affiliates.

Health
12
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Wyoming Valley; the most unlike its peers is Osterhout Free Library. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
13/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KING'S COLLEGE: $650,685 · EducationKING'S COLLEGEWYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $33,749 · EducationTHE LUZERNE FOUNDATION: $26,500 · Education+1 more: $10,000 · EducationPARENTE FAMILY CHARITABLE FUND CO FIDELITY: $158,500 · OtherPARENTE FAMILY CHARITABLE F…CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDING: $52,400 · OtherCENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC RIDI…OUR LADY OF VICTORY CHURCH: $33,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF VICTORY CHURCHJEWISH COMMUNITY ALLIANCE OF NEPA: $26,870 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY ALLIANCE O…Individual grant recipient: $21,000 · OtherWESTMORELAND VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $15,000 · Other+22 more: $121,450 · Other+22 moreGEISINGER HEALTH: $252,500 · HealthGEISINGER HEALTHWYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $61,300 · HealthWYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN…MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $30,000 · HealthMATERNAL & FAMILY HEALT…ULMAN FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 · Health+1 more: $9,250 · HealthCASA OF WYOMING VALLEY: $75,940 · Human ServicesSOUTHAMPTON DAY CARE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesMERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF SCRANTON INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA: $7,600 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY: $62,000 · PhilanthropyFORK OVER LOVE INC: $43,500 · Food & NutritionCAMP ORCHARD HILL INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $1,500 · Animals
Education$720,934Other$428,720Health$368,550Human Services$132,540Philanthropy$62,000Food & Nutrition$43,500Youth Development$20,000Animals$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKING'S COLLEGE: $650,685 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetGEISINGER HEALTH: $252,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF WYOMING VALLEY: $75,940 over 8y, 4.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY: $62,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $61,300 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetFORK OVER LOVE INC: $43,500 over 5y, 4.1% of budgetWYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $33,749 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LUZERNE FOUNDATION: $26,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHAMPTON DAY CARE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH INC: $25,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCAMP ORCHARD HILL INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetULMAN FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOSTERHOUT FREE LIBRARY: $11,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA AL-ANON ASSEMBLY AL-ANON FAMILY GROUPS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF SCRANTON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $9,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA: $7,600 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF LUZERNE COUNTY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KING'S COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds GEISINGER HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds CASA OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF WYOMING VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING VALLEY CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FORK OVER LOVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING SEMINARY COLLEGE PREPARATORY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MATERNAL & FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LUZERNE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHAMPTON DAY CARE FOUNTAIN OF YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMP ORCHARD HILL INC ↗
  • Who funds ULMAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HOUSE OF THE SOUTHERN TIER INC ↗
  • Who funds OSTERHOUT FREE LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA AL-ANON ASSEMBLY AL-ANON FAMILY GROUPS INC ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF SCRANTON INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CANCER WELLNESS CENTER OF NEPA ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS OF LUZERNE COUNTY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Allone CharitiesBenco Family Foundati…The Tambur Family Fou…Hackett Philanthropie…Maslow Family Foundat…Sordoni Family Founda…Allone FoundationWilliam G McGowan Cha…The Luzerne FoundationNesbitt Family Charit…The Blackhorse Founda…Moses Taylor Foundati…
Allone CharitiesPA28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Allone Charities · Benco Family Foundation Fka Cohen Family Charitable Foundation · The Tambur Family Foundation · Hackett Philanthropies Foundation · Maslow Family Foundation Inc · Sordoni Family Foundation · Allone Foundation · William G McGowan Charitable Fund · The Luzerne Foundation · Nesbitt Family Charitable Foundation · The Blackhorse Foundation · Moses Taylor Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Benevento and Mayo Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Benevento and Mayo Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Benevento and Mayo Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Benevento and Mayo Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Benevento and Mayo’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home