Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ben Jackson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$181kRecreation & Sports$40k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$336k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,300
SOUTH GEORGIA REGIONAL TECH$1,000
EMBRY RIDDLE AERONANTICAL$1,000
VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY$1,000
TRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY$1,000
ABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRI COLLEGE$850
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LOYOLA MARYMOUNT: $1k → 14%TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%COLLEGE OF CHARLESTON: $1k → 12%CLEMSON UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%NEW COLLEGE OF FLORIDA: $1k → 10%FULL SAIL UNIVERSITY: $1k → 11%EMBRY RIDDLE AERONANTICAL: $1k → 12%Florida Memorial University: $1k → 15%PENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE: $1k → 16%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10k → 15%KENNESAW STATE COLLEGE: $4k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGAI: $2k → 12%VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 15%ABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRI COLLEGE: $3k → 17%GOAL LINE: $7k → 20%GEORGIA SOUTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSI: $3k → 22%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 24%GEORGIA COLLEGE: $5k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $7k → 27%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10k → 15%VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%ABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRI COLLEGE: $2k → 17%GOAL LINE: $5k → 20%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 24%GEORGIA COLLEGE STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $5k → 27%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5k → 15%VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 15%ABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRI COLLEGE: $2k → 17%GOAL LINE: $3k → 20%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $5k → 27%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5k → 15%GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 13%VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%SOUTH GEORGIA REGIONAL TECH: $3k → 20%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $4k → 27%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5k → 15%VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY: $2k → 24%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $3k → 27%FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $5k → 15%VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $3k → 27%VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY: $2k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $3k → 27%UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA: $2k → 27%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
SC
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$189k · 18 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +80% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
28

Total granted

$189k
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+80%
+24%

Still filing today

11%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    6× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +80%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $32k
  • VS
    VALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $32k

Funded once

  • GS
    GEORGIA SOUTHWESTERN STATE UNIVERSI
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • FA
    FLORIDA A M
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • MS
    MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
3
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
4
Franklin University

Since 1902, Franklin University has been a pioneer in meeting the needs of adult students who have the ambition to continue their education in combination with other responsibilities, receiving its status as a tax exempt organization in…

5
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
6
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
7
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
8
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
9
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
10
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
11
Charleston Southern University

Charleston southern university (csu) is a private, four-year co-educational institution organized under the laws of the state of south carolina as a non-profit organization and sponsored by the south carolina baptist convention. the…

Education
12
Trinity College

To expand on the mission statement made on page 1, trinity's core mission values and characteristics emphasize: 1)commitment to the education of women in a particular way through the design and pedagogy of the historic undergraduate…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loyola Marymount University and the most unlike its peers is Pensacola Christian College Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA — $32,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF GEORGIAVALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITY — $31,500 · OtherVALDOSTA STATE UNIVERSITYGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY — $16,000 · OtherGEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient — $15,340 · OtherIndividual grant recipientABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRI COLLEGE — $9,850 · OtherABRAHAM BALDWIN AGRI COLLEGESOUTH GEORGIA REGIONAL TECH — $8,500 · OtherGEORGIA COLLEGE — $6,000 · Other+27 more — $46,100 · Other+27 moreFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRIST…THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY — $3,000 · EducationFlorida Memorial University Inc — $1,000 · EducationTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · EducationMississippi College — $1,000 · EducationPENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC — $1,000 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $1,000 · EducationTHOMAS UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · EducationEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $1,000 · EducationBERRY COLLEGE INC — $1,000 · EducationLaGrange College — $1,000 · EducationCOVENANT COLLEGE — $1,000 · EducationTRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY INC — $1,000 · EducationBROWN UNIVERSITY — $1,000 · Community Improvement
Other$165,290Youth Development$40,000Education$15,000Community Improvement$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES — $40,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFlorida Memorial University Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMississippi College — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS UNIVERSITY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERRY COLLEGE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLaGrange College — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT COLLEGE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUETT MCCONNELL UNIVERSITY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
  • Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Florida Memorial University Inc
  • Who funds TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Mississippi College
  • Who funds PENSACOLA CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds THOMAS UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds EMBRY-RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds BERRY COLLEGE INC
  • Who funds LaGrange College

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation IncGA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lettie Pate Whitehead Foundation Inc · Folds of Honor Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Georgia Independent College Association Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ben Jackson Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Florida Memorial University Inc18% of income from government
  • Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc2% of income from government
  • Pensacola Christian College Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ben Jackson Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ben Jackson Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph