Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Bella & Seymour Goldberg Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$123kReligion$104kPhilanthropy$95kCivil Rights$65kHuman Services$42kHealth$41kArts & Culture$34kCommunity Improvement$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Temple Emanuel$15,000
Jewish Federation of Greater Dallas$8,250
Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia$7,500
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania$5,500
Main Line Reform Temple$4,804
The Legacy Senior Communities Foundation$3,600
Dallas Holocaust MuseumCenter for Education and Tolerance$1,700
National Council of Jewish Women Inc Dallas$1,250
Tulane Hillel$1,200
CLL Global Research Foundation$1,000
The Weitzman Museum of American Jewish History$1,000
Jewish Family Service of Greater Dallas$500
American Jewish Committee$500
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Greater Philadelphia (JFCS)$500
Jewish National Fund USA$360
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Jewish Family and Children's Service of Greater Philadelphia (JFCS): $500 → 7%Pilots for Patients: $100 → 24%JFCS of Greater Philadelphia: $1k → 22%Jewish Family Service of Greater Dallas: $500 → 14%The Family Place: $250 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
MO
VA
DC
OK
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 32% of Bella & Seymour Goldberg Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Bella & Seymour Goldberg Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$302k · 23 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
25

Total granted

$302k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+14%

Still filing today

65%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    8× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +116%
  • CG
    CLL Global Research Foundation
    8× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +57%
  • TL
    THE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $19k · revenue +139%

Funded once

  • AC
    American Cancer Society
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • CF
    Center for Jewish Education
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +16%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
The Jewish Federation of Greater Washington Inc

The jewish federation of greater washington (federation) envisions a connected and vibrant jewish community that cares for each other, fosters jewish learning and journeys, embraces jewish peoplehood and israel, and acts as a force for…

Philanthropy
4
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
5
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
6
Philadelphia Jewish Film and Media

Philadelphia jewish film and medias mission is to educate and engage diverse philadelphia communities, jewish and non-jewish alike, by presenting world-class film premieres, repertory cinema, and associated programs that are inspired by…

Human Services
7
National Jewish Health

National Jewish Health's mission since 1899 is to heal, discover and educate as a preeminent healthcare institution. We serve by providing the best integrated and innovative care for patients and their families; by understanding and…

Health
8
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago

Juf provides critical resources that bring food, refuge, health care, education and emergency assistance to over 500,000 chicagoans of all faiths and millions of jews in israel and around the world, funding a network of 100+ agencies,…

Philanthropy
9
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc

The jewish federation of greater atlanta cares for, connects and strengthens our jewish community throughout greater atlanta, israel and the world.

Philanthropy
11
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago

Federation amplifies our collective strength to make the world a better place for everyone. we assist people in need, impact chicagoans of all faiths; support israel and the jewish people worldwide; respond swiftly to crises; cultivate…

Philanthropy
12
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Dallas and the most unlike its peers is Pilots for Patients. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community FederationsFaith-Based Senior LivingFood Pantries & AssistanceCommunity Health CentersYouth Development CentersChristian Youth CampsPregnancy Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 44 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%38%35–55yr16%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%0%10–20yr16%18%20–35yr13%11%35–55yr16%71%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,530

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Main Line Reform Temple — $48,425 · OtherMain Line Reform TempleTemple Emanuel — $47,100 · OtherTemple EmanuelAmerican Cancer Society — $10,000 · OtherAmerican Cancer SocietyNational Council of Jewish Women Inc Dallas — $9,225 · OtherNational Council of Jewish Wome…HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $7,900 · OtherHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWIS…+36 more — $21,850 · Other+36 moreTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $102,135 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSIT…UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $15,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTERJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $58,650 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF…JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS — $36,250 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $65,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWIS…Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum — $31,100 · Arts & CultureDallas Holo…THE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC — $19,000 · Arts & CultureTHE LEGACY …WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $2,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $1,100 · Arts & CultureCLL Global Research Foundation — $24,000 · HealthACCESSMATTERS — $4,000 · HealthSOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Health+3 more — $405 · HealthTHE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $17,200 · Animals
Other$144,500Education$117,135Philanthropy$94,900Civil Rights$65,000Arts & Culture$53,200Health$29,405Animals$17,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $102,135 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $65,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $58,650 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS — $36,250 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum — $31,100 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCLL Global Research Foundation — $24,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC — $19,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $17,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $7,900 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetACCESSMATTERS — $4,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHope for Humanity Inc — $2,200 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance — $1,350 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOUR FRIENDS PLACE — $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum — $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSouthwest Jewish Congress — $750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC — $360 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SUMMER CAMP INC — $324 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Place — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $155 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC — $126 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPILOTS FOR PATIENTS — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOWER MERION HS CREW ASSOCIATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS
  • Who funds Dallas Holocaust and Human Rights Museum
  • Who funds CLL Global Research Foundation
  • Who funds THE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES INC
  • Who funds THE LEGACY SENIOR COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE
  • Who funds ACCESSMATTERS
  • Who funds Hope for Humanity Inc
  • Who funds WEITZMAN NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN JEWISH HISTORY
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA
  • Who funds Philabundance
  • Who funds OUR FRIENDS PLACE
  • Who funds The American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
  • Who funds SOCIETY OF INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Southwest Jewish Congress
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF DALLAS INC DBA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREENWICH
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA INC
  • Who funds THE SUMMER CAMP INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Jeff & Bonnie Whitman Charitable FoundationTX15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Jeff & Bonnie Whitman Charitable Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Mb and Edna Zale Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Bella & Seymour Goldberg Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greenwich7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph