How much did BEHAVIORAL IDEAS LAB INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of BEHAVIORAL IDEAS LAB INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

research partner

2019

research partner

2020

research partnerimplementation partner

2021

implementation partnerresearch partner

2022

implementation partner

2023

implementation partner

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $8k
$10k–50k11 grants · $246k
$50k–250k3 grants · $386k

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$21M

Total assets

Largest grants

GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY$200,000
GEORGIA OPPORTUNITY AND RESILIENCE FUND$121,500
HOSTOS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$64,100
NORTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$30,500
NAVICORE SOLUTIONS GARDEN STATE CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING INC$30,000
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF MN$27,500
ARROFI INC$25,000
SELF FINANCIAL INC$25,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY (A DELAWARE CORPORATION)$25,000
MONEY MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL INC$25,000
CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF MARYLAND AND DELAWARE INC$20,000
CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING COMMUNITIES$15,000
PRISM DATA TECHNOLOGIES INC$12,500
THE TRIGGER PROJECT$10,000
TAKE CHARGE AMERICA INC$7,500

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $460k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 55% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$1.8M · 10 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$1.8M

$488k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%

+21%

Still filing today

70%

83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $523k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NS
NAVICORE SOLUTIONS GARDEN STATE CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING INC
3× · 2022–2024 · $74k · revenue +25%
NS
NORTH SEATTLE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION
3× · 2022–2024 · $72k · revenue +140%
LS
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF MN
3× · 2022–2024 · $69k · revenue +71%

Funded once

MU
METROPOLITAN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
one grant, 2021 · $186k
PARTNERS IN HEALTHgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $122k · revenue +60%
CS
CURRY SCHOOL OF EDUCATION FOUNDATION
one grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue -27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Georgetown University

Georgetown university is one of the world's leading academic and research institutions. established in 1789, georgetown is the nation's oldest catholic and jesuit university.

Education

University of Denver

A higher educational institution, providing both undergraduate and graduate degrees.

Education

University of New Haven

See schedule ouniversity of new haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts & professional education.

Education

National Association for College

Empowering college admission counseling professionals through education, advocacy, and community.

Education

National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: to transform health care quality through measurement, transparency and accountability.

Health

Common Cause

Common cause is a nonpartisan, grassroots organization dedicated to upholding the core values of american democracy. we work to ensure open, honest, and accountable government; to promote equal rights, opportunity, and representation for…

—

The Common Application Inc

The common application promotes access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process.

Education

GreenState Credit Union

As the nation's greatest financial institution, we...make profound impact in the lives of our members, empower our employees to create endless opportunities and shape our future, and enhance the vitality of our communities by donating our…

—

Park University

Park university provides leadership and innovative education for a diverse group of learners who will become leaders in the global community.

Education

National Foundation for Credit

The nfcc and its members offer people solutions and support to address financial challenges and take charge of their own financial futures.

Human Services

Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst

The caia association is a global credentialing body for alternative investments, representing professionals in over 95 countries. it upholds high ethical standards, offers the chartered alternative investment analyst designation, and…

Community Improvement

Augustana College

Offer a challenging education that develops the qualities of mind, spirit and body for students.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New America Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Garden State Consumer Credit. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

11/19

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,789,321Human Services$459,500Education$271,083Health$122,008Arts & Culture$64,100International$50,000Philanthropy$25,000Youth Development$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

National Foundation for CreditDC16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Foundation for Credit

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation BEHAVIORAL IDEAS LAB INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING COMMUNITIES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~18 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 621769933 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on CENTER FOR TRANSFORMING COMMUNITIES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 18 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 2% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Behavioral Ideas Lab Inc?

Find your warmest path to Behavioral Ideas Lab Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

BEHAVIORAL IDEAS LAB INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Behavioral Ideas Lab Inc?

More from the funding graph

BEHAVIORAL IDEAS LAB INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

19 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Behavioral Ideas Lab Inc?

More from the funding graph