Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beeksma Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$146k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2020.

Religion$137kInternational$70kYouth Development$57kHuman Services$12kEducation$8kHealth$3k
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k27 grants · $116k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$5,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNION GOSPEL MISSION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
WORLD CONCERN$10,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$7,000
SALVATION ARMY$7,000
WORLD VISION$7,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
PASTOR RONALDS CHILDREN UGANDA ORPHANAGE$7,000
GENESIS PROJECT PORTLAND$6,000
THE CENTER FOR SCIENCE & CULTURE$5,000
PAACS$5,000
TURNING POINT USA$5,000
THE BIBLE PROJECT$5,000
ACLJ$5,000
VICTORY LIFE CHURCH$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 59% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TURNING POINT USA: $5k → 11%VICTORY LIFE CHURCH: $5k → 12%GEORGE HURD MISSIONARY SCHOOL: $2k → 9%KALAHEO MISSIONARY CHURCH: $3k → 9%CITY OF JOY: $7k → 9%EAST WEST MINISTRIES: $8k → 5%MERCY SHIPS: $3k → 12%GOSPEL FOR ASIA: $8k → 14%JESUS FILM CRU: $10k → 13%PRAGER UNIVERSITY: $5k → 13%International Needs: $20k → 8%Bible Project: $5k → 12%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 14%WYCLIFFEJAARS: $5k → 7%Samaritans Purse: $40k → 21%TRIAD: $3k → 3%Oak Harbor Christian School: $13k → 7%WORLD CONCERN: $10k → 9%THRIVE OF CHELAN: $8k → 9%YOUTH DYNAMICS: $5k → 11%RESONATE CHURCH: $2k → 20%COUNTERACT INTERNATIONAL: $5k → 17%PHILADELPHIA CHURCH: $6k → 7%LIFE CHOICES PREGANCY CENTER: $5k → 12%NORTH SHORE CRISTIAN CHURCH: $5k → 9%MERCY SHIPS: $1k → 12%JESUS FILM PROJECT: $5k → 13%INTERNATIONAL NEEDS: $3k → 8%GENESIS PROJECT PORTLAND: $6k → 12%GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $4k → 14%SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $7k → 21%PASTOR RONALDS CHILDREN UGANDA ORPHANAGE: $7k → 7%WORLD CONCERN: $6k → 9%NORTH ISLAND YOUNG LIFE: $10k → 11%PHILADELPHIA CHURCH: $3k → 7%VICTORY LIFE CHURCH: $3k → 12%Gideons International: $3k → 14%OAK HARBOR CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $4k → 7%Salvation Army: $10k → 9%Whidbey Young Life: $10k → 11%OAK HARBOR CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $4k → 7%THE CENTER FOR SCIENCE & CULTURE: $5k → 9%OAK HARBOR PREGNANCY CARE CLINIC: $3k → 7%FRC CHURCH OAK HARBOR: $500 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
MI
OR
CO
VA
TN
NC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 54% of Beeksma Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 27% of the giving stays in WA; by stated purpose, 21%.

Beeksma Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$214k · 11 repeat orgs$211k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
11

Total granted

$214k
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+82%

Still filing today

36%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’25
ReligionInternationalYouth DevelopmentHealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2020–2025 · $47k · revenue +81%
  • IN
    INTERNATIONAL NEEDS
    2× · 2018–2020 · $23k · revenue +37%
  • B
    BIBLEPROJECT
    2× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • WB
    WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC
    one grant, 2019 · $44k
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue +39%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Amazing Facts International

To proclaim to the world the everlasting gospel of revelation 14:6-12 and to encourage revival in the remnant church by leading people to embrace salvation by faith in jesus, to establish them in the church, and to disciple all believers…

Religion
2
The Christian Broadcasting Network Inc

The christian broadcasting network's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. cbn's mission is preaching the gospel of jesus christ into all the world. the mission of cbn and its affiliated organizations is to…

Religion
3
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over seventy countries around the world.

International
4
American Bible Society

Since 1816, american bible society has been fulfilling its mission of making the bible available to every person in a language and format each can understand and afford so all people may experience its life-changing message.

Religion
5
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of jesus christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
6
Visionsynergy

Our mission is to accelerate the great commission by equipping leaders, developing networks, and catalyzing collaboration toward spiritual breakthroughs among the least reached peoples and places of the world.

International
7
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
8
International Partnerships Inc

To provide support for the efforts of christians of the former soviet union in reaching the influencers of their countries for christ.

Religion
9
Life International

To partner with leaders globally to boldly proclaim the biblical truth of the father's heart for life, champion the gospel of jesus christ, and establish life-giving ministries.

Health
10
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
11
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
12
Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization

The lausanne movement exists to activate the body of christ to accelerate global mission together through convening global influencers, creating biblically grounded missional content, fostering catalytic collaboration, and equipping…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is World Vision Inc; the most unlike its peers is Life Choices Pregnancy Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
7/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INC: $44,000 · OtherWYCLIFFE BIBLE TRANSLATORS INCCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INC: $35,000 · OtherCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INCINTERNATIONAL NEEDS: $23,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL NEEDSOak Harbor Christian School: $20,000 · OtherOak Harbor Christian SchoolSalvation Army: $19,000 · OtherSalvation ArmyGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $18,500 · OtherGIDEONS INTERNATIONALWORLD CONCERN: $16,000 · Other+25 more: $142,000 · Other+25 moreSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $47,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSEEast-West Ministries International: $12,500 · ReligionEast-West Ministri…BIBLEPROJECT: $10,000 · ReligionBIBLEPROJECT+1 more: $1,500 · ReligionWORLD VISION INC: $7,000 · InternationalORPHAN HELPERSINC: $5,000 · InternationalGLOBAL HOPE INC: $5,000 · InternationalMercy Ships International: $4,000 · InternationalYOUNG LIFE: $11,500 · Youth DevelopmentLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $5,000 · HealthPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Education
Other$317,500Religion$71,000International$21,000Youth Development$11,500Health$5,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $47,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL NEEDS: $23,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetORPHAN HELPERSINC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Dynamics: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMercy Ships International: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIBLE STUDY FELLOWSHIP: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL NEEDS ↗
  • Who funds East-West Ministries International ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds ORPHAN HELPERSINC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE CHOICES PREGNANCY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds Youth Dynamics ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Ships International ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beeksma Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beeksma Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beeksma Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph