Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beckmoore Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$333k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$92k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$226kReligion$120kHealth$109kAnimals$73kEducation$63kInternational$51kFood & Nutrition$30kEmployment$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $122k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $192k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$92,000
TUMAINI FOUNDATION$50,000
INDIANAPOLIS BALLET INC$50,000
INDIANAPOLIS ZOO (INDIANAPOLIS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC)$35,000
STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION$30,000
COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC$23,000
DANCE KALEIDOSCOPE INC$13,500
USGA FOUNDATION$10,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF HAMILITON COUNTY$10,000
WALSH COLLEGE OF ACCOUNTANCY & BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION$5,000
GLOBAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,500
AMERICAN PIANISTS ASSOCIATION INC$2,000
AMIGOS THE RICHMOND LATINO CENTER INC$1,000
INDYHUMANE (HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS)$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY23–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TURNING POINT FOR GOD: $1k → 11%WALSH COLLEGE OF ACCOUNTANCY & BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION: $5k → 8%THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5k → 9%MEALS ON WHEELS OF HAMILITON COUNTY: $10k → 5%DANCE KALEIDOSCOPE INC: $20k → 16%AMIGOS THE RICHMOND LATINO CENTER INC: $1k → 18%SISTERS OF PROVIDENCE OF SAINT MARY-OF-THE-WOODS: $1k → 19%DELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%TUMAINI FOUNDATION: $50k → 19%CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5k → 8%WALSH COLLEGE OF ACCOUNTANCY & BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION: $5k → 8%MEALS ON WHEELS OF HAMILITON COUNTY: $10k → 5%DANCE KALEIDOSCOPE INC: $14k → 16%WALSH COLLEGE OF ACCOUNTANCY & BUSINESS ADMINSTRATION: $5k → 8%MEALS ON WHEELS OF HAMILITON COUNTY: $10k → 5%DANCE KALEIDOSCOPE INC: $7k → 16%GLOBAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 5%INDYHUMANE (HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS): $2k → 16%GLOBAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 5%INDYHUMANE (HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS): $1k → 16%SECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $92k → 16%SECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $13k → 16%SECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $13k → 16%FACE LOW COST ANIMAL CLINIC: $10k → 16%HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $1k → 16%HERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $1k → 16%INDIANAPOLIS BALLET INC: $95k → 16%INDIANAPOLIS BALLET INC: $50k → 16%INDIANAPOLIS BALLET INC: $33k → 16%THE JOSEF GINGOLD FUND FOR THE INTERNATIONAL VIOLING COMPETITION OF IN: $5k → 16%INDINAPOLIS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $5k → 16%INDINAPOLIS CHAMBER ORCHESTRA: $2k → 16%INDIANAPOLIS ZOO (INDIANAPOLIS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC): $35k → 16%INDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $3k → 16%INDIANAPOLIS ZOO (INDIANAPOLIS ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC): $21k → 16%AMERICAN PIANISTS ASSOCIATION INC: $2k → 16%COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $36k → 16%COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $35k → 16%COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $23k → 16%CROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $1k → 16%CROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
IA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
CO
MD
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$613k · 13 repeat orgs$95k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
9

Total granted

$613k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+22%

Still filing today

77%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $63k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthAnimalsRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IB
    INDIANAPOLIS BALLET INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $178k · revenue +44%
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $94k · revenue +7%
  • SU
    STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • TF
    THE FOUNDATION AGAINST COMPANION-ANIMAL EUTHANASIA INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +22%
  • TJ
    THE JOSEF GINGOLD FUND FOR THE INTL VIOLIN COMPETITION OF INDIANAPOLISgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +76%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Violin Competition of Indianapolis Inc

The international violin competition of indianapolis (ivci) recognizes, rewards and promotes the world's finest young classical violinists and encourages understanding, appreciation and support of the violin repertoire by a large and…

Arts & Culture
2
The Indianapolis Foundation Inc

To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.

Community Improvement
3
Indiana Golf Association Inc

To promote the sport of golf.

—
4
Indiana Cpa Society Inc

Promoting and advocating for the accounting profession

—
5
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

—
6
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
7
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
8
Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…

Community Improvement
9
Indiana Symphony Society Inc

The Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra inspires and unites our community through our music.

Arts & Culture
10
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
11
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
12
Indiana Dental Association Foundation for Dental Health Inc

Established for educational purposes including the public promotion of dental health and providing scholarships to students pursuing as dentists, dental hygienists, dental assistants, and laboratory technicians.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indianapolis Ballet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Health System Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INDIANAPOLIS BALLET INC: $177,500 · Arts & CultureINDIANAPOLIS BALLET INCDANCE KALEIDOSCOPE INC: $40,400 · Arts & CultureDANCE KALEIDOSCOPE INC+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureSECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $118,000 · OtherSECOND PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHTUMAINI FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTUMAINI FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $6,250 · Other+7 more: $10,500 · Other+7 moreCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $94,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH …Global Health System Foundation Inc: $10,000 · HealthGlobal Health Sys…CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $60,000 · EducationSTATE UNIVER…Walsh College of Accountancy & Business Administration: $15,000 · EducationWalsh Colleg…+2 more: $3,000 · EducationIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $55,682 · AnimalsIndianapoli…THE FOUNDATION AGAINST COMPANION-ANIMAL EUTHANASIA INC: $10,000 · AnimalsTHE FOUNDAT…THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5,000 · AnimalsTHE WILD AN…Meals on Wheels of Hamilton County: $30,000 · Food & NutritionUSGA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsINDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Recreation & Sports
Arts & Culture$222,900Other$184,750Health$109,000Education$78,000Animals$70,682Food & Nutrition$30,000Recreation & Sports$12,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINDIANAPOLIS BALLET INC: $177,500 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK INC: $94,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIndianapolis Zoological Society Inc: $55,682 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDANCE KALEIDOSCOPE INC: $40,400 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Hamilton County: $30,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetWalsh College of Accountancy & Business Administration: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FOUNDATION AGAINST COMPANION-ANIMAL EUTHANASIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGlobal Health System Foundation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JOSEF GINGOLD FUND FOR THE INTL VIOLIN COMPETITION OF INDIANAPOLIS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA GOLF FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS OF AMERICA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHERITAGE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN PIANO AWARDS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMIGOS THE RICHMOND LATINO CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMASTERWORKS CHORALE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetDELTA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN24.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Arts Council of Indianapolis Inc · Christel DeHaan Family Foundation Inc · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beckmoore Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beckmoore Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Beckmoore Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Beckmoore Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beckmoore’s filings →

    More from the funding graph