Skip to content

· Private foundation

Beckman-Matsui Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$59kCivil Rights$30kFood & Nutrition$29kEnvironment$27kArts & Culture$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$13kInternational$9kYouth Development$8kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$572k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOSTER YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM$8,000
UCSB FOUNDATION$5,000
PROPUBLICA$3,000
CENTER FOR THE REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$3,000
EARTHJUSTICE$3,000
SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK$2,000
THE SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FIRE FOUNDATION$1,863
IRC SAN DIEGO$1,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE SAN DIEGO$1,000
FEEDING SAN DIEGO$863
KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION$500
WHITMAN COLLEGE$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 28% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Women's Daytime Drop-In Center: $1k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE SAN DIEGO: $1k → 11%Leah's Pantry: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$220k · 23 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
9

Total granted

$220k
$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+82%
+178%

Still filing today

65%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Civil RightsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PRO PUBLICA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $19k · revenue +64%
  • EARTHJUSTICE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $17k · revenue +82%
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
    5× · 2017–2024 · $13k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • MC
    MiraCosta College
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • UO
    University of Iowa Center for Adv
    one grant, 2018 · $2k
  • LP
    LEAH'S PANTRYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +232%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
5
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank

The organization's mission is to mobilize resources to fight hunger in our community. to fulfill its mission, the food bank:* sources and acquires nutritious food and other products and distribute them to people experiencing nutrition…

—
6
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
9
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition
10
The Global FoodBanking Network

To nourish the world's hungry through uniting and advancing food banks.

International
11
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
12
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jacobs & Cushman San Diego Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
20/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MiraCosta College Scholarship Progr: $40,000 · OtherMiraCosta College Scholarship ProgrUCSB Foundation: $38,000 · OtherUCSB FoundationThe San Diego Regional Fire Foundat: $11,197 · OtherThe San Diego Regional Fire FoundatMIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOSTER YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM: $8,000 · OtherMIRACOSTA COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOSTER YOUTH SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM+20 more: $48,678 · Other+20 moreTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $12,500 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FO…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVI…NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $3,000 · Civil RightsNAACP LEGAL D…NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $3,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL IMMI…EARTHJUSTICE: $17,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTI…NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $7,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RE…PRO PUBLICA INC: $18,862 · Arts & CultureJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $8,753 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $2,261 · Food & NutritionYOLO FOOD BANK: $1,100 · Food & NutritionBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $5,600 · EducationInternational Rescue Committee INC: $8,800 · International
Other$145,875Civil Rights$29,500Environment$24,000Arts & Culture$18,862Food & Nutrition$12,114Education$11,600International$8,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $18,862 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $8,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $8,753 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $5,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $4,812 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCatalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties: $3,864 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKITCHENS FOR GOOD: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY: $2,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $2,261 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO REGIONAL FIRE & EMERGENCY: $1,863 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLEAH'S PANTRY: $1,560 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOLO FOOD BANK: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMENS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds JACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF WHITMAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds KAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Catalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties ↗
  • Who funds KITCHENS FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL IMMIGRATION LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO REGIONAL FIRE & EMERGENCY ↗
  • Who funds LEAH'S PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds YOLO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS DAYTIME DROP-IN CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Beckman-Matsui Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Beckman-Matsui Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Beckman-Matsui Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph