· Private foundation
Beacom Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $140k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAN MARCO CATHOLIC CHURCH | $25,000 |
| ST LAMBERT CATHOLIC CHURCH | $25,000 |
| ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH | $25,000 |
| LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES | $25,000 |
| PROGRESS UNITY FUND | $20,000 |
| THE TREVOR PROJECT | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| SIOUX FALLS CARES | $6,000 |
| HUNGRY HEARTS | $6,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN DOWN SYNDROME | $5,000 |
| BISHOP DUDLEY HOUSE | $5,000 |
| BLACK HILLS PARKS & FOREST ASSOC | $5,000 |
| SD COALITION ENDING DOM VIOLENCE | $5,000 |
| MCCROSSAN BOYS RANCH | $5,000 |
| CENTER OF HOPE | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 32% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 31% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $128k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LSLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTH DAKOTA4× · 2019–2024 · $64k · revenue +23%
- SFSIOUX FALLS CARES INC3× · 2019–2024 · $21k · revenue +39%
TREVOR PROJECT INC2× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- ACALPHA CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +31%
- SLST LAMBERT CATHOLIC CHURCH SIOUX FALLSone grant, 2022 · $25k
- SJST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH SPEARFISHone grant, 2022 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To eliminate hunger in south dakota.
End hunger together.
Sd voices for peace provides five programming areas to assist vulnerable communities access services throughout the state: legal services, multilingual outreach, training and education, advocacy and civic engagement and rapid response.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
The association works to promote member credit unions as being safe and sound institutions for insured deposits, responsible lending, and the best place for consumers to receive financial services.
Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…
Advancing healthy communities through a unified voice across the health care continuum.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.
Enhancing and strengthening our community and our regional core.
Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of South Dakota and the most unlike its peers is Western Hills Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 7% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
44 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 44 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALPHA CENTER ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds South Dakota Ballet Co ↗
- Who funds BLACK HILLS PARKS & FORESTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS CARES INC ↗
- Who funds Progress Unity Fund ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF SIOUX FALLS ↗
- Who funds KENADI JEAN WEIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE BANQUET ↗
- Who funds HUNGRY HEARTS INC ↗
- Who funds HELPLINE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TIPI RAISERS ↗
- Who funds SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE LOST AND FOUND ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA RIGHT TO LIFE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds DAKOTABILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds NDN COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds Helping Kids Round First ↗
- Who funds COLORADO BALLET ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · South Dakota Community Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Sanford Group Return · Avera Health · Larson Foundation · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · Sheldon F Reese Foundation · The Graco Foundation · Greg and Pam Sands Foundation · Levo Cares Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Beacom Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.