· Private foundation
BCBSM Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $131k
- $50k–250k46 grants · $4.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United Way Worldwide | $236,710 |
| Northwest Indian Community Development Center | $200,000 |
| Native American Community Clinic | $200,000 |
| Way to Grow | $150,000 |
| Northfield Healthy Community Initiative | $125,000 |
| Partnership Academy | $125,000 |
| Hmong American Partnership | $110,000 |
| Amherst H Wilder Foundation | $100,000 |
| Northland Foundation | $100,000 |
| St David's Center | $100,000 |
| Lao Assistance Center of Minnesota | $100,000 |
| Comunidades Latinas Unidas En Servicio | $100,000 |
| Project Motherpath Inc | $100,000 |
| CARE Clinic | $100,000 |
| Apple Tree Dental | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
81 repeat relationships — 38 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $489k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MLMID-MINNESOTA LEGAL ASSISTANCE6× · 2019–2024 · $950k · revenue +53%
- VFVOICES FOR RACIAL JUSTICE6× · 2019–2024 · $777k · revenue +13%
- NFNORTHLAND FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $740k · revenue +221%
Funded once
- HAHmong American Partners (for Navigator Coalition)one grant, 2023 · $120k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $100k
- ACAFRICAN COMMUNITY SERVICESone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.
Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.
Leadership matters mn is focused on advancing a policy agenda that places working minnesotans first. we support economic growth, job creation and equitable tax and education policies that will allow every minnesotan to thrive.
Women's Foundation of Minnesota is a statewide community foundation investing in ending systemic inequities and driving innovation for gender and racial justice. WFM applies an Intersectional Equity Framework inclusive of gender, race,…
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
To encourage, promote, support, and elect pro-choice women of all political parties to all levels of public office in minnesota.
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
Creating powerful advocacy to enhance economic vitality in the minneapolis-st. paul region.
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
To develop and advocate for public policy that makes Minnesota's economy more prosperous and fair for all Minnesotans.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hmong American Partnership and the most unlike its peers is Project Motherpath Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 133 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MID-MINNESOTA LEGAL ASSISTANCE ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR RACIAL JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds NORTHLAND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PORTICO HEALTHNET ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST INDIAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER NWICDC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE ACHIEVEMENT ZONE ↗
- Who funds Coalition of Asian American Leaders ↗
- Who funds NATIVE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS EN LUCHA ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA UNITED ↗
- Who funds Think Small ↗
- Who funds PROJECT FINE ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds AMHERST H WILDER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds WAY TO GROW ↗
- Who funds NORTHFIELD HEALTHY COMMUNITY INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds HISPANIC OUTREACH OF GOODHUE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds The Advocates For Human Rights ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds LAKES AND PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds NEXUS COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds THE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CENTRO TYRONE GUZMAN ↗
- Who funds UNIDOS MINNESOTA EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds HMONG AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds GREATER MINNEAPOLIS COUNCIL OF CHURCHES ↗
- Who funds Partnership Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds SEWA-AIFW ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds REVIVING THE ISLAMIC SISTERHOOD FOR ↗
- Who funds APPLE TREE DENTAL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Fr Bigelow Foundation · The McKnight Foundation · Women's Foundation of Minnesota · The Bush Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Medica Foundation · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · Pohlad Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization BCBSM Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.