Skip to content
BBVA Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

BBVA Foundation

Its FY2021 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8.0M
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$1.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
04Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2021.

Philanthropy$1.8MArts & Culture$1.5MCommunity Improvement$1.3MHousing & Shelter$1.3MEducation$697kHuman Services$489kCivil Rights$418kHealth$143kOther$0
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $1,549,213, the rows itemized in this filing. The $8,044,018 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $6,494,805 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$1,549,213
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PNC Foundation$1,549,213
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PNC Foundation: $1.5M → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Housing Channel

Revitalize distressed neighborhoods in Tarrant County and throughout Texas communities in need and increase the amounts of decent, affordable housing available to lower income families and individuals with special needs.

Housing & Shelter
2
Austin Affordable Housing Corporation

To ensure and preserve quality, affordable housing opportunities for low- to moderate-income families in austin as well as provide financial literacy and homeownership opportunities.

Housing & Shelter
3
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
4
Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

The neighborhood reinvestment corporation (d.b.a neighborworks america) is a congressionally chartered public non-profit corporation that creates opportunities for people to live in affordable homes, improve their lives, and strengthen…

—
5
Chattanooga Neighborhood Enterprise

Mission: to create economically diverse neighborhoods filled with financially empowered citizens and housing for all.vision: all chattanoogans can afford a safe place in a strong neighborhood to call home. belief: we believe the future of…

Housing & Shelter
6
Fort Worth Community Land Trust

The Fort Worth Community Land Trust (FWCLT) was created to provide relief to the poor and distressed and combat community deterioration. Specifically, FWCLT will create, steward and preserve a permanent supply of safe, secure, and…

Housing & Shelter
7
Central Houston Civic Improvement Inc

Central houston civic improvement lnc.'s mission is to ensure the continued vitality and to support development of downtown and the central city that is critical to the continued health and growth of houston.

Community Improvement
8
California Housing Partner Corporation

The California Housing Partnership Corporation creates and preserves affordable and sustainable homes for Californians with low incomes by providing expert financial and policy solutions to nonprofit and public partners.

Unclassified
9
Hacienda Community Development Corporation

Hacienda is a latino community development corporation that strengthens families by providing affordable housing, homeownership spuport, economic advancement, and educational opportunties.

—
10
Housing Plus

Innovatively utilize resources to preserve & create quality affordable multi-family housing committed to fulfilling individual housing needs and stabilize neighborhoods.

Housing & Shelter
11
Central Houston Inc

See schedule ocentral houston champions a thriving downtown by connecting influential leaders through initiatives that advance the future of business and community for all.

—
12
Housing Forward

Housing forward leads in the development and implementation of an effective homeless response system to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring in dallas and collin counties.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Loveland Habitat for Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is Pnc Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

412 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 412 of the 512 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
124
Early backer (in before they grew)
402/412
Grantees still filing
307/412
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PNC FOUNDATION: $1,549,213 · OtherPNC FOUNDATIONAvenue: $326,000 · OtherAvenue+102 more: $2,125,839 · Other+102 moreTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $1,175,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF FINE AR…Houston Symphony Society: $98,715 · Arts & CultureHouston Symphony Soci…+6 more: $147,260 · Arts & Culture+6 moreNATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INC: $100,000 · Community ImprovementMONTGOMERY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Community ImprovementBUSINESS AND COMMUNITY LENDERS OF TEXAS: $45,600 · Community ImprovementWOODLAWN UNITED INC: $30,000 · Community ImprovementCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $30,000 · Community ImprovementLIFTFUND INC: $24,640 · Community ImprovementCALIFORNIA CAPITAL SMALL BUSINESS FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $24,520 · Community ImprovementTHE CATALYST CENTER FOR BUSINESS & ENTREPRENEURSHIP: $22,980 · Community ImprovementTHE GREENLINING INSTITUTE: $20,000 · Community ImprovementFLORIDA COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $20,000 · Community ImprovementBIRMINGHAM KIWANIS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Community Improvement+17 more: $186,120 · Community ImprovementWEALTH WATCHERS INC: $108,440 · Housing & ShelterDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $75,000 · Housing & ShelterNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD: $39,500 · Housing & ShelterTEXAS STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION: $22,000 · Housing & ShelterGREATER BIRMINGHAM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter+18 more: $210,825 · Housing & ShelterKIPP Texas Inc: $237,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationBUILDINGCOMMUNITYWORKSHOP: $25,000 · EducationA G Gaston Business Institute: $20,000 · EducationSTANISLAUS BUSINESS ALLIANCE INC: $19,000 · Education+12 more: $141,800 · EducationAustin Area Urban League: $55,000 · Human ServicesBirmingham Urban League Inc: $35,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP MISSION INC: $21,060 · Human ServicesBakerRipley: $20,000 · Human ServicesALABAMA ASSET BUILDING COALITION: $20,000 · Human ServicesTREC COMMUNITY INVESTORS: $17,500 · Human ServicesARIZONA HOUSING COALITION: $15,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORHOOD RECOVERY COMMUNIT DEVELOPMENT CORP: $15,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSN OF BIRMINGHAM: $14,800 · Human ServicesCHINESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesALLIANCE OF COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS OF WEST ALABAMA INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCredit Coalition Inc: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHICANOS POR LA CAUSA INC CPLC: $10,000 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BIRMINGHAM INC: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 · Civil RightsHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Civil Rights
Other$4,001,052Arts & Culture$1,420,975Community Improvement$573,860Housing & Shelter$525,765Education$468,300Human Services$288,360Civil Rights$200,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPNC FOUNDATION: $1,549,213 over 1y, 45% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $1,175,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetKIPP Texas Inc: $237,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWEALTH WATCHERS INC: $108,440 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetHouston Zoo Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT COALITION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHouston Symphony Society: $98,715 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIDOSUS: $80,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONGRESSIONAL HISPANIC CAUCUS INSTITUTE INC: $80,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetABILITY HOUSING INC: $75,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTRELLIS: $75,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetDEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF TARRANT COUNTY INC: $75,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetTEXAS ASSOCIATION OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $55,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetAustin Area Urban League: $55,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNATIONAL LOW INCOME HOUSING COALITION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMONTGOMERY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetBIRMINGHAM CIVIL RIGHTS INSTITUTE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetInnovation Depot Inc: $48,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBUSINESS AND COMMUNITY LENDERS OF TEXAS: $45,600 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetREV BIRMINGHAM INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHouston Grand Opera Association Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF BROWNSVILLE DBA COME DREAM COME BUILD: $39,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSYSTEM FOR EDUCATION EMPOWERMENT AND SUCCESS: $37,260 over 1y, 21% of budgetHEART OF TEXAS GOODWILL INDUSTRIES INC: $37,120 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBirmingham Urban League Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetQuality of Life Foundation of Austin Inc: $31,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetWOODLAWN UNITED INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetTEXAS ENERGY POVERTY RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $27,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetALABAMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $26,020 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetRAILROAD PARK FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBUILDINGCOMMUNITYWORKSHOP: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetLIFTFUND INC: $24,640 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA CAPITAL SMALL BUSINESS FINANCIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $24,520 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CATALYST CENTER FOR BUSINESS & ENTREPRENEURSHIP: $22,980 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetTEXAS STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION: $22,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDSHIP MISSION INC: $21,060 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc: $20,149 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GREENLINING INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBakerRipley: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF BALDWIN COUNTY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFLORIDA COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER BIRMINGHAM HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALABAMA ASSET BUILDING COALITION: $20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetA G Gaston Business Institute: $20,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wells Fargo FoundationThe Zions Bancorporat…Mufg Union Bank Found…Texas State Affordabl…Cadence Bank Foundati…Protective Life Found…National Association …Charles Schwab Founda…Susan Mott Webb Chari…The Daniel Foundation…Comerica Charitable F…Truist Foundation Inc
Wells Fargo FoundationMN75.6× affinity83 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wells Fargo Foundation · The Zions Bancorporation Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation · Cadence Bank Foundation · Protective Life Foundation · National Association for Latino Community Asset Builders · Charles Schwab Foundation · Susan Mott Webb Charitable Trust · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · Comerica Charitable Foundation · Truist Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization BBVA Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from BBVA Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to BBVA Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to BBVA Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 512 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on BBVA’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home