Skip to content

· Private foundation

Baye Foundation Inc

Its FY2019 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$591k
Granted FY2019
11
Grants FY2019
3
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$395kPhilanthropy$121kArts & Culture$95kInternational$80kCivil Rights$50kYouth Development$25kHuman Services$25kReligion$25kOther$0
02FY2019 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $165k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $121k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UWM FOUNDATION$300,000
CHICAGO CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$120,648
LOS ANGELES MUSEUM OF THE HOLOCAUST$45,000
LOS ANGELES WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL$30,000
30 YEARS AFTER INC$25,000
CALIFORNIA JEWISH LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$25,000
HISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY - CALIFORNIA$10,000
BEYOND DIFFERENCES$10,000
CENTER FOR ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED FOR SELF-EMPOWERMENT INC$10,000
INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL STUDIES-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY$10,000
THE JUNIOR STATE OF AMERICA FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 93% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CALIFORNIA JEWISH LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $25k → 8%THE JUNIOR STATE OF AMERICA FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%YOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION: $25k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5k → 17%WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $50k → 14%UWM FOUNDATION: $300k → 17%CHICAGO CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $121k → 14%BEYOND DIFFERENCES: $10k → 8%INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL STUDIES-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY: $10k → 10%30 YEARS AFTER INC: $25k → 14%JEWISH MUSEUM MILWAUKEE: $15k → 17%CENTER FOR ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED FOR SELF-EMPOWERMENT INC: $10k → 14%CONGREGATION EMANU-EL B'NE: $25k → 17%HISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY - CALIFORNIA: $10k → 14%LOS ANGELES WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL: $30k → 14%LOS ANGELES MUSEUM OF THE HOLOCAUST: $45k → 14%LOS ANGELES MUSEUM OF THE HOLOCAUST: $10k → 14%MERONA CAMPUS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Us Middle East Project Inc

The organization's mission is to engage in non partisan analysis of u.s. foreign policy in the middle east, with special emphasis on the middle east peace process, and to present policymakers in the united states, in the region and in the…

International
2
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
3
J Leaders

Our vision is to develop ethical, impactful Jewish young adult leaders to ensure a vibrant Jewish community and make the world a better place. Our mission is to empower and engage Jewish young adults through leadership development and…

Youth Development
4
Impact Forum Foundation

The Impact Forum is an exclusive network of philanthropists. We are connecting philanthropists that support each others initiatives and collaborate to empower and meet with exceptional non-profit organizations to fight antisemitism,…

Philanthropy
5
Voices United for Israel

Educational information regarding Israel and the Middle East.

International
6
Limmud Bay Area

Provide jewish education and cultural services to the jewish community of the s.f. bay area

Religion
7
Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas)
—
8
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life

Hillel's mission is to enrich the lives of jewish undergraduate and graduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world.

Religion
9
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

—
10
Tzedek America

Tzedek America is an program based in Los Angeles, CA. The program is designed to encourage you to embrace your passions, explore what drives you and find meaning in your life through national and international travel, social justice…

Religion
11
University of Judaism Foundation
—
12
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall; the most unlike its peers is Beyond Differences. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · EducationTHE UWM FOUNDATION INCZETA BETA TAU FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · EducationZETA BETA TAU FOUNDATION INCYOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION: $25,000 · EducationYOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION30 YEARS AFTER INC: $25,000 · Education30 YEARS AFTER INC+1 more: $10,000 · EducationCHICAGO CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $120,648 · OtherCHICAGO CHARITABLE FOUN…CONGREGATION EMANU-EL B'NE: $25,000 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL B…INSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENTAL STUDIES-UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY: $10,000 · OtherINSTITUTE OF GOVERNMENT…Beyond Differences: $10,000 · OtherBeyond Differences+1 more: $5,000 · OtherWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $50,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON…LOS ANGELES WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL AND TOWN HALL: $30,000 · InternationalLOS ANGELE…HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $55,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA JEWISH LEGISLATIVE CAUCUS LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $25,000 · Civil RightsCENTER FOR ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED FOR SELF-EMPOWERMENT INC: $10,000 · Civil RightsHISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY - CALIFORNIA: $10,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 · Civil RightsDETOUR COMPANY THEATER INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $15,000 · Philanthropy
Education$435,000Other$170,648International$80,000Arts & Culture$55,000Civil Rights$50,000Human Services$25,000Philanthropy$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UWM FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $55,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL AND TOWN HALL: $30,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetYOUTH MENTORING CONNECTION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetDETOUR COMPANY THEATER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budget30 YEARS AFTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetMILWAUKEE JEWISH FEDERATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ASIAN AMERICANS UNITED FOR SELF-EMPOWERMENT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMERONA LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetBeyond Differences: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetHISPANAS ORGANIZED FOR POLITICAL EQUALITY - CALIFORNIA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR STATE OF AMERICA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation Council of Greater LaCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation Council of Greater La · The California Wellness Foundation · California Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Baye Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Baye Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Baye Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Baye Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Baye’s filings →

    More from the funding graph