Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Battier Take Charge Foundation

BATTIER TAKE CHARGE FOUNDATION ("btcf") helps promising young people from miami, houston, detroit and camden, nj, take charge of their lives and reach their full potenital through college scholarships, mentorsip, networking, and leadership training.

$407k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$126k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$818kYouth Development$636kPhilanthropy$40kHousing & Shelter$33kHuman Services$10kFood & Nutrition$10kCommunity Improvement$7kHealth$5k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 16 grants below total $340,955 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $406,795 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $65,840 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $51k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $164k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $126k
$12,256
Median grant
8
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF AMERICA$125,991
DREXEL UNIVERSITY$36,726
ROWAN UNIVERSITY$33,967
STOCKTON UNIVERSITY$21,450
GRAND CANYON UNIVERISTY$18,204
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$15,521
TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY$14,001
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY$12,256
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$12,000
RIDER UNIVERSITY$9,419
UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA$9,066
LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY$8,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$7,842
CAMDEN COUNTY COLLEGE$5,640
FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY$5,490
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%chapman partnership inc: $5k → 15%Detroit Police Athletic Leaque: $10k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$316k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +18% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$1.2M
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+12%

Still filing today

75%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $180k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America
    5× · 2019–2025 · $943k · revenue +311%
  • FI
    FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +57%
  • UO
    University of Miami
    3× · 2019–2022 · $32k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $13k · revenue +2%
  • SC
    Spelman College
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -15%
  • MB
    MIAMI BOARDING SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
3
University of Miami
4
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education
5
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
6
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
7
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

10
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
11
Barry University Inc

Barry university is a catholic institution of higher education founded by the adrian dominican sisters. with a liberal arts tradition, barry university is a scholarly community committed to the highest academic standards in undergraduate,…

Education
12
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Florida Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Campus Charities Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Health CentersPublic University Foundatio…Independent K-8 SchoolsAt-Risk Youth MentoringChild and Family ServicesFood Pantries & Assistance
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number27%0%<5yr16%4%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr15%32%20–35yr9%16%35–55yr12%32%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value27%0%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%6%10–20yr15%9%20–35yr9%2%35–55yr12%82%55yr+

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/41
the rest of the field
17%
17,089/103,003

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
15/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Big Brothers Big Sisters Of America — $942,617 · OtherBig Brothers Big Sisters Of AmericaMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $40,923 · Other+19 more — $235,109 · Other+19 moreDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $36,726 · EducationDREXEL UNIVERSITYFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $34,957 · EducationFLORIDA INTERNATION…University of Miami — $31,575 · EducationUniversity of MiamiMOREHOUSE COLLEGE — $30,854 · EducationMOREHOUSE COLLEGETHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $28,000 · EducationTHOMAS JEFFERSON UN…Grand Canyon University — $18,204 · EducationGrand Canyon Univer…THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF F…RIDER UNIVERSITY — $14,457 · EducationTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $13,382 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $12,813 · EducationSpelman College — $10,056 · EducationMIAMI BOARDING SCHOOL INC — $10,000 · EducationHAMPTON UNIVERSITY — $10,000 · Education+1 more — $7,842 · EducationAMERICAN CAMPUS CHARITIES FOUNDATION — $16,138 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $16,045 · PhilanthropyTHE COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $8,029 · PhilanthropyDETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INCORPORATED — $10,000 · Human ServicesCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC — $5,250 · Human ServicesFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,218,649Education$274,866Philanthropy$40,212Human Services$15,250Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters Of America — $942,617 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetDREXEL UNIVERSITY — $36,726 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $34,957 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $31,575 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE — $30,854 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSANCTUARY CAMPUS FOUNDATION INC — $28,000 over 3y, 69% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY — $28,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGrand Canyon University — $18,204 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CAMPUS CHARITIES FOUNDATION — $16,138 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $16,045 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $16,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRIDER UNIVERSITY — $14,457 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $13,382 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY — $12,813 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpelman College — $10,056 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI BOARDING SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTON UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDETROIT POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INCORPORATED — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COLLEGE FOUNDATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $8,029 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $7,842 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC — $5,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPKD Foundation — $5,155 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC6.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Battier Take Charge Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Big Brothers Big Sisters of America21% of income from government
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
  • The Morgan State University Foundation Inc7% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc5% of income from government
  • University of Miami5% of income from government
  • Rider University1% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Battier Take Charge Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Battier Take Charge Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph