Skip to content

· Private foundation

Batterson Ministries Inc

Receive, maintain, and administer assets in perpetuity exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, and/or educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended and the regulations issued thereunder and to use and apply the whole or any part of the principal and…

$315k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$277k
Largest
01What it funds
0173% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.5MHealth$79kEducation$54kHuman Services$35kEnvironment$25kInternational$15kEmployment$10kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
  • $250k+1 grant · $277k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL COMMUNITY CHURCH$276,573
SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$15,000
FOTH AND ASSOCIATES$10,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$10,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
WORLD VISION$468
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESCUE FREEDOM: $5k → 9%DC DREAM CENTER: $11k → 14%DC DREAM CENTER: $9k → 14%DC DREAM CENTER: $7k → 14%DC DREAM CENTER: $2k → 14%DC DREAM CENTER: $400 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 12 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +3% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

$2.2M
$106k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+3%

Still filing today

25%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL COMMUNITY CHURCH
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2023 · $125k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $60k

Funded once

  • CP
    CIRS Project
    one grant, 2024 · $34k · 47% of their budget
  • SU
    SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $23k
  • TC
    TABLEOLOGY CORPORATION
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visual Story International

Visual story international fosters a network of christians working to fuel a global movement of story telling to further god's kingdom.

Religion
2
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
3
International Storytelling Center

To creatively apply the power of storytelling to enrich the human experience and enhance the quality of life by addressing the challenges and opportunities in today's society and to infuse storytelling into the mainstream of…

Arts & Culture
4
Radio Diaries Inc

Radio diaries uncovers the extraordinary stories of ordinary life. we believe that one person documenting their own story can help us rethink our assumptions; remind us of our shared humanity; and make us truly feel what it would be like…

Arts & Culture
5
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
6
Liberty Womens Clinic

Liberty Women's Clinic ministers with the love of Christ by empowering people to make informed, life-affirming decisions about pregnancy, sexual health, and relationships.

Health
7
The Wordsower Company Inc

To proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ throughout the world. Taking His love to the orphans, widows and children being trafficked by providing homes, feeding, education, clothing and care.

International
8
The Dream Center

Multifaceted faith based free service to overcome chronic homelessness.

Human Services
9
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
10
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
11
Destiny Rescue International

Destiny rescue's mission is to rescue children from sexual exploitation and human trafficking and equip them to stay free.

International
12
Whole Child International

Whole Child International promotes positive developmental outcomes for children through child protection systems strengthening and improving the quality of care for children in low- and middle-income countries.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bittersweet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Cirs Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NATIONAL COMMUNITY CHURCH: $1,793,064 · OtherNATIONAL COMMUNITY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $125,136 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+24 more: $249,845 · Other+24 moreSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $45,200 · EducationDC Dreamcenter: $29,591 · Human ServicesRESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL: $5,000 · Human ServicesCIRS Project: $34,320 · HealthBITTERSWEET FOUNDATION: $6,730 · Arts & CultureWORLD VISION INC: $936 · InternationalTHE GOOD STORY CO INC: $250 · Religion
Other$2,168,045Education$45,200Human Services$34,591Health$34,320Arts & Culture$6,730International$936Religion$250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC: $45,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCIRS Project: $34,320 over 1y, 47% of budgetDC Dreamcenter: $29,591 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetBITTERSWEET INC: $13,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBITTERSWEET FOUNDATION: $6,730 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $936 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD STORY CO INC: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds CIRS Project ↗
  • Who funds DC Dreamcenter ↗
  • Who funds BITTERSWEET INC ↗
  • Who funds BITTERSWEET FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GOOD STORY CO INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Batterson Ministries Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Batterson Ministries Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Batterson Ministries Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Batterson Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Batterson Ministries’ filings →

    More from the funding graph