Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Batterson Ministries Inc

Receive, maintain, and administer assets in perpetuity exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, literary, and/or educational purposes within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code of 1986, as amended and the regulations issued thereunder and to use and apply the whole or any part of the principal and…

$127k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Religion$1.5MHealth$79kEducation$54kHuman Services$35kEnvironment$25kInternational$15kEmployment$10kArts & Culture$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $95k
$8,360
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CIRS PROJECT$29,320
NATIONAL COMMUNITY CHURCH$25,120
SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$20,960
TABLEOLOGY CORP$10,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$10,000
GLOBAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION$8,360
BITTERSWEET FOUNDATION$6,730
GLOBAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION$5,000
CIRS PROJECT$5,000
NATIONAL COMMUNITY CHURCH$3,316
SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$2,500
WORLD VISION$468
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESCUE FREEDOM: $5k → 9%DC DREAM CENTER: $11k → 14%DC DREAM CENTER: $9k → 14%DC DREAM CENTER: $7k → 14%DC DREAM CENTER: $2k → 14%DC DREAM CENTER: $400 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
WI
OH
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 11 repeat orgs$116k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$1.9M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+94%

Still filing today

27%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NATIONAL COMMUNITY CHURCH
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2021–2023 · $125k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2021–2022 · $60k

Funded once

  • T
    THINKORY
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • RF
    RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONALgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +339%
  • MT
    MIDDLE TREE CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visual Story International

Visual story international fosters a network of christians working to fuel a global movement of story telling to further god's kingdom.

Religion
2
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
3
International Storytelling Center

To creatively apply the power of storytelling to enrich the human experience and enhance the quality of life by addressing the challenges and opportunities in today's society and to infuse storytelling into the mainstream of…

Arts & Culture
4
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
5
Radio Diaries Inc

Radio diaries uncovers the extraordinary stories of ordinary life. we believe that one person documenting their own story can help us rethink our assumptions; remind us of our shared humanity; and make us truly feel what it would be like…

Arts & Culture
6
Liberty Womens Clinic

Liberty Women's Clinic ministers with the love of Christ by empowering people to make informed, life-affirming decisions about pregnancy, sexual health, and relationships.

Health
7
The Wordsower Company Inc

To proclaim the gospel of Jesus Christ throughout the world. Taking His love to the orphans, widows and children being trafficked by providing homes, feeding, education, clothing and care.

International
8
The Dream Center

Multifaceted faith based free service to overcome chronic homelessness.

Human Services
9
Destiny Rescue International

Destiny rescue's mission is to rescue children from sexual exploitation and human trafficking and equip them to stay free.

International
10
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
11
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
12
Whole Child International

Whole Child International promotes positive developmental outcomes for children through child protection systems strengthening and improving the quality of care for children in low- and middle-income countries.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bittersweet Inc and the most unlike its peers is Cirs Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NATIONAL COMMUNITY CHURCH — $1,516,491 · OtherNATIONAL COMMUNITY CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $125,136 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+22 more — $227,345 · Other+22 moreDC Dreamcenter — $29,591 · Human ServicesRESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL — $5,000 · Human ServicesCIRS Project — $34,320 · HealthSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC — $30,200 · EducationBITTERSWEET FOUNDATION — $6,730 · Arts & CultureWORLD VISION INC — $468 · InternationalTHE GOOD STORY CO INC — $250 · Religion
Other$1,868,972Human Services$34,591Health$34,320Education$30,200Arts & Culture$6,730International$468Religion$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCIRS Project — $34,320 over 1y, 47% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC — $30,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDC Dreamcenter — $29,591 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetBITTERSWEET INC — $13,700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBITTERSWEET FOUNDATION — $6,730 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD VISION INC — $468 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GOOD STORY CO INC — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CIRS Project
  • Who funds SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds DC Dreamcenter
  • Who funds BITTERSWEET INC
  • Who funds BITTERSWEET FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RESCUE- FREEDOM INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC
  • Who funds THE GOOD STORY CO INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Servant FoundationKS11.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Batterson Ministries Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Batterson Ministries Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Batterson Ministries Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph