Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bartz Marr Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$205k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$3.4MEducation$506kFood & Nutrition$335kHuman Services$126kPhilanthropy$110kHousing & Shelter$50kYouth Development$21kCrime & Legal$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$200,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY$200,000
KUKIO HOOMANA FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Mission Hospice & HOME CARE INC: $1k → 7%Help A Mother Out: $20k → 10%Help A Mother Out: $10k → 10%At the Crossroads: $10k → 10%At the Crossroads: $10k → 10%At the Crossroads: $5k → 10%ALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $5k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
IN
OH
CA
VA
AZ
TN
DC
HI
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.5M · 25 repeat orgs$321k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
28

Total granted

$4.5M
$321k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+21%

Still filing today

76%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    4× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +578%
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    6× · 2019–2025 · $430k · revenue +128%
  • QN
    QUEEN'S NORTH HAWAII COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
    2× · 2017–2019 · $75k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $135k · revenue +39%
  • AS
    ABODE SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +39%
  • MA
    MONTALVO ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
3
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
4
Kaiser Foundation for the Advancement of Integrated Health Care

Kaiser foundation for the advancement of integrated health care is a nonprofit 501(c)(4) advocacy organization to engage in proactive advocacy to promote understanding of the benefits of integrated care and coverage, and support of the…

Health
5
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
7
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
8
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
11
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
12
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tipping Point Community; the most unlike its peers is Alas Ayudando Latinos a Sonar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
37/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MJ Foundation for Parkinson's Research: $1,600,000 · OtherMJ Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchCHRISTIAN BROTHERS LA SALLE HIGH SCHOOL: $300,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN BROTHERS LA SALLE HIGH SCHOOLBLUEFIELD PROJECT: $200,000 · OtherBLUEFIELD PROJECT+26 more: $251,000 · Other+26 moreTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,150,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARK…The Bluefield Project to Cure Frontotemporal Dementia: $300,000 · HealthThe Bluefield Project to Cure Frontot…QUEEN'S NORTH HAWAII COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $75,000 · Health+5 more: $78,000 · HealthSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $430,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVE…LOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $105,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES & FIS…UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $135,000 · EducationROCK STEADY BOXING INC: $10,000 · EducationFIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $6,000 · EducationFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community Foundation: $25,000 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyKUKIO HOOMANA FUND: $15,000 · PhilanthropyTHE JIM SAUNDERS FUND: $10,000 · PhilanthropyTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $10,000 · PhilanthropyHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHELP A MOTHER OUT: $30,000 · Human ServicesAT THE CROSSROADS: $25,000 · Human ServicesALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHINE TOGETHER INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Other$2,351,000Health$1,603,000Food & Nutrition$535,000Education$161,000Philanthropy$140,000Human Services$61,000Youth Development$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,150,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $430,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe Bluefield Project to Cure Frontotemporal Dementia: $300,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FAMILY KITCHEN: $105,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetQUEEN'S NORTH HAWAII COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANCER CAREPOINT INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse: $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHELP A MOTHER OUT: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAT THE CROSSROADS: $25,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetABODE SERVICES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKUKIO HOOMANA FUND: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVISION TO LEARN: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTALVO ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JIM SAUNDERS FUND: $10,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetLIFEMOVES: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY GIVING TREE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROCK STEADY BOXING INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWest Contra Costa Public Education Fund: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAtherton Police Officers Assn: $10,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetTIPPING POINT COMMUNITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIVE KEYS SCHOOLS AND PROGRAMS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHINE TOGETHER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION FREEDOM PAWS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALAS AYUDANDO LATINOS A SONAR: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN ALCHEMY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATIENT ACCESS NETWORK FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCSNK2A1 FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION HOSPICE & HOME CARE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetParkinson & Movement Disorder Alliance: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA35.1× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The William & Flora Hewlett Foundation · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Bright Funds Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bartz Marr Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bartz Marr Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bartz Marr Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph