Skip to content

· Community foundation

Bartlesville Community Foundation

To provide a simple way to do good works.

$2.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
57
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$3.8MReligion$2.1MArts & Culture$1.1MYouth Development$835kFood & Nutrition$719kHealth$646kHuman Services$458kHousing & Shelter$278kOther$0
02FY2025 · 57 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 57 grants below total $2,154,294, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,716,419 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $562,125 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $63k
  • $10k–50k38 grants · $748k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.3M
$16,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$27M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL ISD #30$249,864
CITY CHURCH$234,755
LIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER$201,200
OKMUSIC$125,200
BARTLESVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER$116,801
GRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH$103,400
BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL FOUNDATION$100,726
INTENTIONAL PARENTS INTERNATIONAL$100,000
TRI COUNTY TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION$59,262
THE COTTAGE$52,900
CONCERN$47,975
BARTLESVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION$45,610
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$44,629
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY$35,826
MARY K OXLEY NATURE CENTER$35,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $269k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE COTTAGE: $53k → 14%THE COTTAGE: $33k → 14%THE COTTAGE: $18k → 14%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $18k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $13k → 14%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $15k → 14%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $13k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $10k → 14%THE COTTAGE: $13k → 14%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $12k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $8k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $8k → 14%MARTHA'S TASK: $11k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $8k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $7k → 14%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $6k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $6k → 14%SAMARITAN COUNSELING AND GROWTH CENTER: $6k → 14%WASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $5k → 14%BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OKLAHOMA: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
OR
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
KS
AR
TN
NC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Bartlesville Community Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 84%.

Bartlesville Community Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$10M · 74 repeat orgs$489k to everyone else

74 repeat relationships: 48 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

74
40

Total granted

$10M
$384k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+16%

Still filing today

57%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $106k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2025 · $568k · revenue +54% · 35% of their budget
  • TC
    TRI COUNTY TECH ENDOWMENT FUND INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $514k · revenue +88% · 29% of their budget
  • OK MOZART INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $393k · revenue +31% · 27% of their budget

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2020–2021 · $40k
  • OC
    OGLESBY CIVIL DEFENSE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $33k · revenue -37%
  • TB
    THEATER BARTLESVILLE
    one grant, 2017 · $24k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
Ouachita Baptist University

Ouachita baptist university is a christ-centered learning community. embracing the liberal arts tradition, the university prepares individuals for ongoing intellectual and spiritual growth, lives of meaningful work, and reasoned engagement…

Education
3
Bartlesville Community Foundation

To provide a simple way to do good works.

Philanthropy
4
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Barclay College

The mission of barclay college is to prepare students in a bible-centered environment for effective christian life, service, and leadership.

Education
6
Southwestern Oklahoma State University Foundation Inc

To help southwestern oklahoma state university raise the resources needed for the university to advance beyond what is possible with state funds and to assist students with tuition and fees in the form of scholarships for attendance at…

Education
7
Oklahoma School of Science and Mathematics Foundation

The mission of the oklahoma school of science and mathematics foundation is to foster excellence in k-12 science and mathematics education throughout oklahoma by supporting the school's outreach projects, programs, development, students,…

Philanthropy
8
University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma Foundation Inc

The purpose of the USAO Foundation is to support the mission of the University of Science & Arts of Oklahoma.

Education
9
Oklahoma Association of Community Colleges Inc

The oklahoma association of community colleges provides leadership and advocacy to advance the function, purpose, and values of community college education.

Education
10
Oklahoma Bible Academy

The mission of oklahoma bible academy is to integrate god's word into all aspects of learning and living. the purpose of oba is to provide a sound academic education integrated with a christian view of god and the world. it is the belief…

—
11
Oklahoma Educational Memorial Trust Fdn

Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…

Education
12
Oklahoma Arts Institute Foundation

To support, promote, and improve the programs and services of the oklahoma arts institute.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Musical Theatre of Bartlesville; the most unlike its peers is The Frank Phillips Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 123 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/67
Grantees still filing
42/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL ISD #30: $1,618,052 · OtherBARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOL ISD #30CATHOLIC CHURCH OF MMO: $633,880 · OtherCATHOLIC CHURCH OF MMOTRI COUNTY TECH ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $514,171 · OtherTRI COUNTY TECH ENDOWMENT FUND INCGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCH: $510,900 · OtherGRACE COMMUNITY CHURCHCITY CHURCH OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $411,055 · OtherCITY CHURCH OF BARTLESVILLE INCBARTLESVILLE COMMUNITY CENTER TRUST AUTHORITY: $304,009 · Other+78 more: $3,586,977 · Other+78 morePATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $370,174 · EducationOklahoma State University Foundation: $100,651 · EducationOKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $96,049 · EducationThe University of Tulsa: $72,125 · EducationBARTLESVILLE ALL SPORTS BOOSTER CLUB INC: $59,778 · EducationThe Northeastern State University Foundation Inc: $38,250 · Education+12 more: $99,766 · EducationOK MOZART INC: $393,300 · Arts & CultureWESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $105,211 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSICAL THEATRE OF BARTLESVILLE: $95,008 · Arts & CultureBARTLESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $78,606 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $23,080 · Arts & CultureBARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $568,173 · PhilanthropyBARTLESVILLE REGIONAL UNITED WAY IN: $31,890 · PhilanthropyBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE: $365,993 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $69,458 · Youth DevelopmentBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $16,301 · Youth Development+2 more: $20,590 · Youth DevelopmentIntentional Parents International: $157,000 · Human ServicesCOTTAGE OF BARTLESVILLE INC A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $117,000 · Human ServicesBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $71,577 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $63,897 · Human Services+2 more: $16,700 · Human ServicesLIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $239,448 · Community Improvement+1 more: $5,151 · Community Improvement
Other$7,579,044Education$836,793Arts & Culture$695,205Philanthropy$600,063Youth Development$472,342Human Services$426,174Community Improvement$244,599

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $568,173 over 5y, 35% of budgetTRI COUNTY TECH ENDOWMENT FUND INC: $514,171 over 7y, 29% of budgetOK MOZART INC: $393,300 over 4y, 27% of budgetPATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $370,174 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE: $365,993 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $239,448 over 6y, 19% of budgetIntentional Parents International: $157,000 over 2y, 8.4% of budgetON THE ROCK MINISTRIES INC: $122,299 over 6y, 9.2% of budgetCOTTAGE OF BARTLESVILLE INC A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION: $117,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetBARTLESVILLE ART ASSOCIATION: $115,575 over 8y, 30% of budgetBluestem Regional Medical Development Foundation Inc: $113,967 over 6y, 83% of budgetThe Frank Phillips Foundation Inc: $111,934 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCHURCHES UNITED FOR COMMUNITY CONCERN: $109,506 over 6y, 15% of budgetWESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION: $105,211 over 7y, 16% of budgetRUN THE STREETS INC: $102,795 over 3y, 21% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $100,651 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INC: $96,977 over 4y, 13% of budgetOKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY: $96,049 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSICAL THEATRE OF BARTLESVILLE: $95,008 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetBARTLESVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION: $87,139 over 4y, 50% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY SPCA INC: $79,712 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetBARTLESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $78,606 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $72,125 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $71,577 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetYOUNG SCHOLARS OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $69,458 over 6y, 16% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY ELDER CARE INC: $63,897 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetBARTLESVILLE ALL SPORTS BOOSTER CLUB INC: $59,778 over 4y, 22% of budgetTHE AGAPE MISSION OF BARTLESVILLE INC: $46,440 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetABILITYWORKS OF OKLAHOMA INC: $43,100 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetThe Northeastern State University Foundation Inc: $38,250 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetRAY OF HOPE ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $34,628 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetOGLESBY CIVIL DEFENSE VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $33,234 over 1y, 14% of budgetBARTLESVILLE REGIONAL UNITED WAY IN: $31,890 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNEHEMIAH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $31,250 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetTHE JOURNEY HOME INC: $28,750 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE KIDDIE PARK: $26,681 over 3y, 28% of budgetGEORGE MIKSCH SUTTON AVIAN RESEARCH CENTER INC: $26,300 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $26,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetYOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INC: $23,479 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $21,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBARTLESVILLE COMMUNITY CONCERT ASSOCIATION: $17,080 over 2y, 13% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $16,301 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTMATTERS INC: $15,590 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetTHETA XI FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOLIVET NAZARENE UNIVERSITY: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TASK: $10,700 over 1y, 10% of budgetGREEN COUNTRY FREE CLINIC: $10,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BARTLESVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRI COUNTY TECH ENDOWMENT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds OK MOZART INC ↗
  • Who funds PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BARTLESVILLE ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE OUTREACH CENTER OF BARTLESVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Intentional Parents International ↗
  • Who funds ON THE ROCK MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds COTTAGE OF BARTLESVILLE INC A NON-PROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BARTLESVILLE ART ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Bluestem Regional Medical Development Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Frank Phillips Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHURCHES UNITED FOR COMMUNITY CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds RUN THE STREETS INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PRICE TOWER ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSICAL THEATRE OF BARTLESVILLE ↗
  • Who funds BARTLESVILLE SPORTS COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COUNTY SPCA INC ↗
  • Who funds BARTLESVILLE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lyon FoundationOK65.9× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lyon Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Jeanalee and Charles Parsons Foundation · K S Adams Foundation Co-Trust · Cresap Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · McAnaw Family Foundation · Barry W Lowe and Karen Sue Lowe Foundation for Education · Je and le Mabee Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Community Food Bank of Eastern Oklahoma Inc · Ben F and Karen K Baker Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bartlesville Community Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bartlesville Community Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 380%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 68%
  • George Miksch Sutton Avian Research Center Inc: 68% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
38get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 123 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bartlesville’s filings →

More from the funding graph