Skip to content

· Private foundation

Barrett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$121kFood & Nutrition$39kHousing & Shelter$22kYouth Development$20kHealth$18kReligion$11kCivil Rights$6kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$474k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR LADY OF PEACE$5,000
ALEXANDRA HOUSE$3,600
OPEN CUPBOARD$3,000
EVERY MEAL$2,000
VEAP$2,000
NEW PATH MENTAL HEALTH$2,000
OPTIONS FOR WOMEN EAST$1,500
CENTENNIAL FOOD SHELF$1,500
MOVEFORWARD$1,500
ARCHDIOCESE OF ST PAUL$1,200
SOJOURNER PROJECT$1,000
HOPE 4 YOUTH$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BRITTANY'S PLACE$1,000
ST MARY'S HEALTH CLINICS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%SOJOUNER PROJECT: $1k → 11%SOJOURNER PROJECT: $1k → 11%SOJOUNER PROJECT: $1k → 11%SOJOUNER PROJECT: $500 → 11%SOJOUNER PROJECT: $500 → 11%SOJOUNER PROJECT: $500 → 11%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $4k → 7%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $4k → 7%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $1k → 6%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $3k → 7%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $1k → 6%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $3k → 7%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $1k → 6%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $3k → 7%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $750 → 6%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $2k → 7%YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU: $250 → 6%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $2k → 7%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $2k → 7%ALEXANDRA HOUSE: $2k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE: $1k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE: $1k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE: $750 → 7%SHARING CARING HANDS: $1k → 11%FAMILY PROMISE: $500 → 7%SHARING CARING HANDS: $750 → 11%SHARING CARING HANDS: $250 → 11%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $5k → 14%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $5k → 14%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $3k → 14%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $3k → 14%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $2k → 14%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $750 → 14%OUR LADY OF PEACE: $100 → 14%COMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE: $800 → 11%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES: $750 → 11%YWCA OF MPLS: $1k → 11%CRADLE OF HOPE: $1k → 14%CRADLE OF HOPE: $1k → 14%CRADLE OF HOPE: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$262k · 48 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

48 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
18

Total granted

$262k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+47%

Still filing today

50%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $22k · revenue +39%
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF PEACE
    7× · 2019–2025 · $19k · revenue +76%
  • OF
    OPTIONS FOR WOMEN EAST
    8× · 2017–2025 · $8k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MINNESOTA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • LO
    LEGACY OF CARING CAMPAIGN
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy House Minneapolis
Human Services
2
The Dwelling Place

The Dwelling Place is a Christ-centered ministry providing healing and hope to victims of domestic abuse through supportive services and a safe, transitional place to call home.

Human Services
3
Anna Marie's Alliance

Provide education, intervention and advocacy to those affected by relationship abuse with a holistic approach and anti-oppression focus.

Human Services
4
Partners for Affordable Housing

Partners for Affordable Housing is missioned to provide shelter for homeless families and individuals and help them secure economically viable long term housing. The Organization owns and operates a number of scattered site housing…

—
5
The Family Place

Assisting families in shelters to gain more confidence in building future goals that will lead to success of the entire family.

—
6
St John the Evangelist Homeless Shelter Inc

To honor the dignity, restore hope and create lasting change for homeless and those at risk in the green bay area.

Housing & Shelter
7
Family Pathways

Family Pathways works alongside people to enhance lives through a continuum of essential services and, together with community, champions positive social change.

Human Services
8
Agate Housing & Services Inc

To end homelessness and relieve hunger through action and advocacy.

Religion
9
Missions Inc Programs

See Schedule O.Established in 1895, Missions Inc. Programs is a multi-service non-profit organization with a long history of providing services to those who are most in need, each year offering thousands of people, whose lives have been…

—
10
Young Women's Christian Association of St Paul

YWCA St. Paul's mission is to eliminate racism, empower women and promote peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
11
Cornerstone Advocacy Service

Cornerstone disrupts violence through advocacy, support, and prevention. We partner with individuals, families, and organizations to build communities free of harm.

Human Services
12
Youthlink

To be a community in which all youth, without regard to their living situation, have an equal opportunity to pursue and achieve their goals and dreams. the agency does this by supporting, resourcing, and empowering young people on their…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc; the most unlike its peers is Missing Grace Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 72 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
25/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUARDIAN ANGELS: $65,800 · OtherGUARDIAN ANGELSCHRISTIAN CUPBOARD FOOD SHELF: $18,500 · OtherCHRISTIAN CUPBOARD FOOD SHELFIndividual grant recipient: $7,750 · OtherMOVEFORWARD: $7,500 · OtherLOVE INC: $6,000 · Other+47 more: $69,100 · Other+47 moreALEXANDRA HOUSE INC: $22,350 · Human ServicesALEXANDRA HOUSE INCOUR LADY OF PEACE: $18,850 · Human ServicesOUR LADY OF PEACESojourner Project Inc: $4,500 · Human ServicesSojourner Project IncYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU INCFamily Promise in Anoka County: $3,250 · Human ServicesFamily Promise in Anoka …Cradle of Hope: $3,000 · Human Services+4 more: $4,550 · Human Services+4 moreOPTIONS FOR WOMEN EAST: $8,000 · HealthMISSING GRACE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthTUBMAN: $1,550 · HealthST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS: $1,000 · HealthENKRATEIA HOUSE OF HOPE: $750 · HealthAVENUES FOR YOUTH: $6,550 · Youth DevelopmentHOPE 4 Youth: $6,500 · Youth DevelopmentEVERY MEAL: $7,050 · Food & NutritionEMMA NORTON SERVICES: $4,000 · Housing & ShelterMINNESOTA BOAT CLUB INC: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$174,650Human Services$60,500Health$13,800Youth Development$13,050Food & Nutrition$7,050Housing & Shelter$4,000Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALEXANDRA HOUSE INC: $22,350 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetOUR LADY OF PEACE: $18,850 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPTIONS FOR WOMEN EAST: $8,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetEVERY MEAL: $7,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAVENUES FOR YOUTH: $6,550 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE 4 Youth: $6,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL CAMP CHERITH: $5,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetVEAP Inc: $5,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSojourner Project Inc: $4,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN CUPBOARD EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF DBA OPEN CUPBOARD: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMMA NORTON SERVICES: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTH SERVICE BUREAU INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFamily Promise in Anoka County: $3,250 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMINNESOTA BOAT CLUB INC: $3,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSHARING AND CARING HANDS INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC: $1,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPANTHER FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTUBMAN: $1,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH CLINICS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY EMERGENCY SERVICE INC: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENKRATEIA HOUSE OF HOPE: $750 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetIMPACT SERVICES INC: $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW LIFE FAMILY SERVICES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERHOUSE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNION GOSPEL MISSION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALEXANDRA HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR LADY OF PEACE ↗
  • Who funds OPTIONS FOR WOMEN EAST ↗
  • Who funds EVERY MEAL ↗
  • Who funds AVENUES FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds HOPE 4 Youth ↗
  • Who funds NORTH CENTRAL CAMP CHERITH ↗
  • Who funds VEAP Inc ↗
  • Who funds Sojourner Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN CUPBOARD EMERGENCY FOOD SHELF DBA OPEN CUPBOARD ↗
  • Who funds EMMA NORTON SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU INC ↗
  • Who funds Family Promise in Anoka County ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA BOAT CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds Cradle of Hope ↗
  • Who funds MISSING GRACE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SHARING AND CARING HANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds SIMPSON HOUSING SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds PANTHER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TUBMAN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Otto Bremer TrustMN31.9× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Otto Bremer Trust · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · The Minneapolis Foundation · Allina Health System · Pohlad Family Foundation · The Graco Foundation · Edina Realty Foundation · Fred C and Katherine B Andersen Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barrett Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barrett Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Barrett Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Barrett Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 72 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Barrett Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph