Skip to content
Barnabas Health Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Barnabas Health Inc

The organization is an affiliate within rwjbarnabas health; a tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system.

$1.0M
Granted FY2022
9
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$675k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$1.8MInternational$1.7MReligion$1.5MEducation$1.0MHuman Services$726kHousing & Shelter$289kPhilanthropy$250kCommunity Improvement$208kOther$0
02FY2022 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $91k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $675k
$37,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.7B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOCIAL FINANCE - PAY IT FORWARD NJ LLC$675,000
ONE TEN COALITION$150,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY$75,000
NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE$40,000
SOCK SHOP OF AMERICA$37,000
SALAAM ICE CREAM PARLOR$13,990
GREATER NEWARK CONSERVANCY$8,750
PROPEL AMERICA$7,500
RARITAN VALLEY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SOCIAL FINANCE - PAY IT FORWARD NJ LLC: $675k → 16%BLACKFEM INC: $14k → 10%COMING HOME OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC: $160k → 8%COMING HOME OF MIDDLESEX CO: $40k → 8%COMING HOME OF MIDDLESEX CO: $40k → 8%COMING HOME OF MIDDLESEX CO: $40k → 8%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $40k → 16%NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE: $40k → 16%THE PARTNERSHIP FOR MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
KY
VA
DC
OK
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

8%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$593k · 5 repeat orgs$7.2M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
21

Total granted

$593k
$6.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 5% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $889k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Coming Home of Middlesex County
    4× · 2018–2021 · $280k · revenue +36%
  • THE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $80k · revenue +60%
  • GREATER NEWARK CONSERVANCY INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $59k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • EH
    ELIZABETHTOWN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $1.6M · revenue +11%
  • MI
    MISSIONS IN HAITI INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1.6M · revenue +43%
  • SO
    SISTERS OF CHARITY OF ST ELIZABETH CONVENT OF ST ELIZABETH
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Jersey Future Inc

New jersey future promotes sensible growth, redevelopment and infrastructure investments to foster vibrant cities and towns, protect natural lands and waterways, enhance transportation choices, provide access to safe, affordable and…

—
2
New Jersey Alliance for Culture Change
Health
3
New Jersey Food Council Inc

To provide vision and leadership to advance the interest of the food industry in new jersey.

—
4
New Jersey Innovation Institute Inc

We are an innovative research org. dedicated to revitalizing economic development within nj.

Science & Tech
5
Newark Community Health Centers Inc

The mission of newark community health centers is to provide affordable, high quality, and accessible healthcare to the communities that we serve. as one of the largest providers of comprehensive primary care services for uninsured and…

Health
6
New Jersey Health Care Quality Institute Inc

The Organization's mission is to improve the safety, quality, and affordability of healthcare for everyone.

—
7
Newark Alliance Inc

To work in partnership to make newark a better, safer place to work, live, learn, play, and do business.

Philanthropy
8
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
9
New Jersey Policy Perspective

New Jersey Policy Perspective (NJPP) is a nonpartisan think tank that drives policy change to advance economic, social, and racial justice through evidence-based, independent research, analysis, and strategic communications.

Arts & Culture
10
New Jersey Citizen Action

To protect and expand the rights of citizens of the state of new jersey, and encourage active citizen involvement in campaigns promoting economic, social and racial equity.

—
11
Fund for New Jersey
—
12
New Jersey Council of County Colleges

To perform statewide coordinating functions for New Jerseys community colleges and develop community-college led partnerships and solutions to expand educational and economic opportunity.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Local Initiatives Support Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Elizabethtown Healthcare Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELIZABETHTOWN HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $1,606,000 · HealthELIZABETHTOWN HEALTHCAR…+2 more: $30,400 · HealthMISSIONS IN HAITI INC: $1,581,079 · InternationalMISSIONS IN HAITI INC+1 more: $37,500 · InternationalSISTERS OF CHARITY OF ST ELIZABETH CONVENT OF ST ELIZABETH: $1,500,000 · OtherSISTERS OF CHARITY OF ST ELI…COMMON MARKET MID-ATLANTIC INC: $100,000 · OtherONETEN COALITION INC: $150,000 · OtherONETEN COALITION INC+8 more: $239,640 · Other+8 moreSocial Finance Inc: $675,000 · Human ServicesSocial Finance In…Coming Home of Middlesex County: $280,086 · Human ServicesComing Home of Mi…TIDES CENTER: $150,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERTHE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEW JERSEY IN…+2 more: $23,665 · Human ServicesRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVER…+4 more: $29,500 · EducationTHE CODEY FUND FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC: $150,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $75,000 · PhilanthropyLIG GLOBAL FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $150,000 · Community ImprovementINVEST NEWARK A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT CORP: $40,000 · Community ImprovementBLCSID PARTNERSHIP INC: $18,000 · Community Improvement
Health$1,636,400International$1,618,579Other$1,989,640Human Services$1,208,751Education$1,029,500Philanthropy$287,500Community Improvement$208,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSocial Finance Inc: $675,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetComing Home of Middlesex County: $280,086 over 4y, 13% of budgetLOCAL INITIATIVES SUPPORT CORPORATION: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONETEN COALITION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CODEY FUND FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC: $150,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetCOMMON MARKET MID-ATLANTIC INC: $100,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC: $80,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER NEWARK CONSERVANCY INC: $58,750 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetSoup Kitchen 411 Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetLIG GLOBAL FOUNDATION INC: $37,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetMAP International Inc: $37,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJERSEY CARES INC: $30,150 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN AGRICULTURE COOPERATIVE: $23,750 over 2y, 6.8% of budgetNEWARK SCIENCE AND SUSTAINABIL: $18,000 over 1y, 18% of budgetBLCSID PARTNERSHIP INC: $18,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetBlackfem Inc: $14,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetTHE PARTNERSHIP FOR MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $9,665 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMEFRONT INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DEMOCRACY COLLABORATIVE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROPEL AMERICA: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSAINT BARNABAS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRaritan Valley Community College Foundation: $5,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Provident Bank Fo…Columbia Bank Foundat…Victoria Foundation I…The Prudential Founda…The Hyde and Watson F…Devils Youth Foundati…Devils Care Foundatio…The McJ Amelior Found…Geraldine R Dodge Fou…Pseg Foundation IncAmalgamated Charitabl…
Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ24.9× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Provident Bank Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · Victoria Foundation Inc · The Prudential Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Devils Youth Foundation Inc · Devils Care Foundation Inc F/K/A New Jersey Devils Foundation Inc · The McJ Amelior Foundation · Geraldine R Dodge Foundation Inc · Pseg Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Barnabas Health Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Barnabas Health Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Soup Kitchen 411 Inc: 55% of income from government
  • Coming Home of Middlesex County: 46% of income from government
  • Social Finance Inc: 12% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Jersey Cares Inc: 6% of income from government
  • The Partnership for Maternal and Child Health of Northern New Jersey Inc: 4% of income from government
  • United Way of Northern New Jersey Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Urban Agriculture Cooperative: 2% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Barnabas Health’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home