Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bala Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$713
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$25kReligion$5kHealth$2kArts & Culture$2kFood & Nutrition$350Housing & Shelter$207Public Safety & Disaster$161International$100
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$80
Median grant
2
States reached
$21k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Sri Meenakshi Temple Society$713
Samskrita Bharati$200
MD Anderson Cancer Center$100
American Heart Association$80
Houston Food Bank$75
Star of Hope Mission$51
American Red Cross$50
American Cancer Society$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%All Indian Movement for Seva: $100 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$32k · 10 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
12

Total granted

$32k
$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+116%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureReligionHealthHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT
    3× · 2017–2019 · $25k · revenue +277%
  • SE
    SELF ENQUIRY LIFE FELLOWSHIP
    2× · 2018–2019 · $700 · revenue +64%
  • SN
    Sankara Nethralaya OM Trust Inc
    2× · 2022–2024 · $550 · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • AS
    ASIA SOCIETY TEXAS CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +162%
  • SO
    SN OM TRUST
    one grant, 2020 · $250
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Varasiddhi
Arts & Culture
2
Sri Karunamayi Institute of Vedic Studies and Meditation Center

The very essence of spirituality and religion lies in understanding the depth of ancient wisdom, connecting to the divine, and achieving inner peace. our organization, rooted in the profound teachings of vedic scriptures and the practice…

Religion
3
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
4
University of Spiritual Research
Religion
5
Classical Arts Society of Houston

Formed in 1993, the Classical Arts Society of Houston is a non-profit organization dedicated to promoting and maintaining the rich heritage of the classical performing arts of India. In particular, the organization presents South Indian…

Arts & Culture
6
Society for Assistance International

To support all charitable and religious causes for the welfare of the poor and needy with no discrimination

International
7
Vedanta Institute Houston

Education

Arts & Culture
8
Forum for Religious Freedom

Foster & protect the religious diversity and pluralism, protecting, preserving, rejuvenating and disseminating information about non aggressive religious traditions

Religion
9
Southern Asian Public Health Association
Health
10
Gujarati Samaj of the Capital Distr
Arts & Culture
11
Sunyata Meditation Association of Texas

This is religion organization. Budda temple.

Religion
12
Sri Aurobindo Learning Center
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Mission; the most unlike its peers is Gauri Siddhivinayak Temple of Houston Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT: $24,793 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT+1 more: $550 · EducationSRI MEENAKSHI TEMPLE SOCIETY: $4,332 · OtherSRI MEENAKSHI TEMPLE…The Houston Food Bank: $350 · OtherThe Houston Food Ban…MD Anderson Cancer Center: $300 · OtherSN OM TRUST: $250 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $250 · OtherST JUDE'S CHIDLREN RESEARCH HOSPITAL: $250 · Other+7 more: $641 · Other+7 moreASIA SOCIETY TEXAS CENTER: $2,000 · Arts & CultureSAMSKRITA BHARTI: $200 · Arts & CultureSELF ENQUIRY LIFE FELLOWSHIP: $700 · ReligionGauri Siddhivinayak Temple of Houston Inc: $101 · ReligionAmerican Heart Association Inc: $430 · HealthSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $157 · Housing & ShelterGLOBAL ORGANIZATION FOR DIVINITY: $108 · InternationalALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $100 · Human Services
Education$25,343Other$6,373Arts & Culture$2,200Religion$801Health$430Housing & Shelter$157International$108Human Services$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT: $24,793 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSELF ENQUIRY LIFE FELLOWSHIP: $700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSankara Nethralaya OM Trust Inc: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $430 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION: $157 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGLOBAL ORGANIZATION FOR DIVINITY: $108 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGauri Siddhivinayak Temple of Houston Inc: $101 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND FOUNDATION & ALUMNI ENGAGEMENT ↗
  • Who funds ASIA SOCIETY TEXAS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SELF ENQUIRY LIFE FELLOWSHIP ↗
  • Who funds Sankara Nethralaya OM Trust Inc ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds SAMSKRITA BHARTI ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL ORGANIZATION FOR DIVINITY ↗
  • Who funds Gauri Siddhivinayak Temple of Houston Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALL INDIA MOVEMENT FOR SEVA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY14.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bala Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bala Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Bala Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Bala Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bala Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph