Skip to content

· Private foundation

Bagnard Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$621k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$1.7MYouth Development$675kReligion$400kArts & Culture$130kFood & Nutrition$100kHousing & Shelter$35kHealth$21kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $500k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Harvard-Westlake High School$150,000
A Place Called Home$100,000
Harmony Project$100,000
Urban TXT Teens Exploring$50,000
Youth Champions Inc$50,000
School on Wheels$50,000
Ready to Succeed$25,000
Little Dolphins by the Sea$25,000
ArtCenter College of Design$25,000
St Raphael Catholic School$25,000
The People Concern$10,000
Leukemia Lymphoma SOC$5,000
Verbum Dei Jesuit High School$5,000
Westside Guild of Children's Hospital$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $41k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%The People Concern: $10k → 14%The People Concern: $10k → 14%The People Concern: $10k → 14%Everychild Foundation: $6k → 14%Safe Place for Youth: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 15 repeat orgs$495k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$2.5M
$269k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+11%

Still filing today

47%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $226k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AP
    A PLACE CALLED HOME
    4× · 2021–2024 · $325k · revenue +2%
  • TL
    THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES
    4× · 2020–2023 · $250k · revenue +20%
  • SO
    SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • CM
    College Match LA
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • CP
    Community Partners for College
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • LH
    Loyola High School
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
City Hearts Kids Say Yes to the Arts La Fringe Theatre Inc

City hearts is dedicated to combating inequities in arts access. specifically, we provide high-impact, holistic visual and performing arts education to underserved elementary, middle, and high school students in los angeles. our classes…

Youth Development
3
Los Angeles Team Mentoring Inc

Los Angeles Team Mentorings (LATM) mission is to guide middle school students growing up in challenging urban environments to recognize and reach their full potential. See Schedule O for more details.

Youth Development
4
College Match

College match partners with high schools in los angeles county to identify high-achieving, low-income high school students and provide them with the necessary tools and guidance to get into top-ranked colleges with significant financial…

Education
5
Publicolor Inc

Publicolor is an innovative educational youth development organization that empowers students facing immense life challenges for academic and career success through a multi-year project-based continuum of programs. the organization's…

Education
6
David's Harp Foundation

To inspire, educate, and empower "opportunity youth", to achieve academic success through music education, sound engineering, and multimedia production.

Youth Development
7
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
8
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
9
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
10
Legacy La Youth Development Corp

To make positive interventions in the lives of young people by offering alternatives to gangs and violence. legacy la builds the capacity of youth to reach their full potential and equips them with tools to transform their lives and…

Crime & Legal
11
Harlem Children's Zone Inc

We enhance the life for children and families in some of nyc's most devastated neighborhoods.

Human Services
12
Economic Development Corporation of Los Angeles County

The function of the corporation shall be to ease the burdens of government by assisting, implementing, supporting and/or contributing to the support of programs, projects and activities of a public nature. which are directed toward…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Place for Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Brianna Kupfer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Harvard-Westlake High School: $620,000 · OtherHarvard-Westlake High SchoolThe Parish of StMatthew: $400,000 · OtherThe Parish of StMatthewA PLACE CALLED HOME: $325,000 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOMEUnited Friends of Children: $200,000 · OtherUnited Friends of ChildrenREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $200,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGANLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $100,000 · OtherCollege Match LA: $100,000 · OtherCommunity Partners for College: $100,000 · OtherUrban TXT Teens Exploring: $100,000 · OtherVERBUM DEI JESUIT HIGH SCHOOL: $80,000 · Other+5 more: $121,000 · OtherTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $250,000 · EducationTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION …SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $100,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEELS INCHarmony Project: $100,000 · EducationHarmony ProjectNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $90,000 · EducationNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCH…YOUTH CHAMPIONS INC: $50,000 · EducationYOUTH CHAMPIONS INCREADY TO SUCCEED: $25,000 · EducationART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN: $25,000 · EducationTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $30,000 · Human ServicesThe Everychild Foundation: $6,000 · Human ServicesSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 · HealthINNER-CITY ARTS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BRIANNA KUPFER FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$2,346,000Education$640,000Human Services$41,000Health$10,000Arts & Culture$5,000Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $325,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES: $250,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $100,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetHarmony Project: $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $90,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetYOUTH CHAMPIONS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREADY TO SUCCEED: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Everychild Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BRIANNA KUPFER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWESTSIDE GUILD OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds THE LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Harmony Project ↗
  • Who funds NEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH CHAMPIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds READY TO SUCCEED ↗
  • Who funds ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds The Everychild Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SAFE PLACE FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIANNA KUPFER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE GUILD OF CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community FoundationCA14.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Kanoff Family Foundation co Jefferies & Company · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Bagnard Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Bagnard Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Bagnard Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph