Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

B & H Way Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Youth Development$479kHealth$384kReligion$315kHousing & Shelter$220kHuman Services$205kEducation$155kRecreation & Sports$45kEnvironment$40kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOULDER FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%ECDC - AFRICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 12%ECDC - AFRICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 12%ECDC - AFRICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $20k → 12%ECDC-AFRICAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 12%HAMMER RESIDENCES: $25k → 11%YOUTHLINK: $90k → 11%YOUTHLINK: $50k → 11%YOUTHLINK: $35k → 11%YOUTHLINK: $25k → 11%YOUTHLINK: $25k → 11%YOUTHLINK: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 11 repeat orgs$324k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +76% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

11 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$1.6M
$319k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+76%
+11%

Still filing today

55%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentEducationHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Y
    YOUTHLINK
    6× · 2017–2023 · $245k · revenue +4%
  • II
    INVEST IN KIDS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $234k · revenue +76%
  • COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES
    6× · 2018–2023 · $200k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • IO
    INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +55%
  • PN
    PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $29k · revenue +3%
  • PN
    PARK NICOLLET GROUP RETURNgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +43%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Park Nicollet Health Services

Our mission is to improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and community.

Health
2
Minnesota Housing Partnership

Minnesota housing partnership (mhp) expands housing and community development opportunity by leading collaborative work to promote systems change and grow develoopment capacity.

3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

4
Touchstone Mental Health

Touchstone mental health provides innovative, person-centered services that foster hope, health and well-being. we envision a world where all people whose lives are affected by mental illness will flourish with effective treatment, quality…

Human Services
5
Community Care Health Plan Inc

Community care health plan's mission is to develop and demonstrate innovative, flexible, community-based approaches to care for at-risk adults, in order to optimize their quality of life and optimize the allocation of community resources.

Health
6
Lakes and Prairies Community Action Partnership Inc

Lakes & prairies community action partnership (caplp) is celebrating 60 years of providing services and working to achieve our mission to eliminate poverty by empowering families and engaging communities. our services are designed to…

Human Services
7
Group Health Inc

Our mission is to improve health and well-being in partnership with our members, patients and community.

Health
8
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
9
Grand Itasca Clinic and Hospital

Provide quality, accessible, and valuable health care services via a hospital, home health agency, and clinic to the surrounding rural community.

Health
10
Glencoe Regional Health Services

Glencoe regional health services exists to improve every life by offering high-quality, safe, and accessible healthcare. we are dedicated to strengthening healthcare by connecting our communities, enhancing the patient experience,…

Health
11
Ramsey Integrated Health Services

Ramsey integrated health services' mission is to provide the best home care experience that meets the needs of our patients.

12
Senior Community Services

Our mission is empowering people as they age.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Outreach and Community Partners and the most unlike its peers is The Boca Grande Preschool Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CYCLEHEALTH — $285,000 · OtherCYCLEHEALTHINTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY FUND — $250,000 · OtherINTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY FUNDCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES — $200,000 · OtherCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIESST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC SCHOOL — $110,000 · OtherST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $50,000 · OtherCOURTE OREILLES LAKE ASSOCIATION — $45,000 · Other+9 more — $183,500 · Other+9 moreYOUTHLINK — $245,000 · Human ServicesYOUTHLINKETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INC — $115,000 · Human ServicesETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DE…Hammer Residences Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesHammer Residences IncINVEST IN KIDS — $234,013 · Youth DevelopmentINVEST IN KID…COURTE OREILLES LAKES ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentLAKE EFFECT CONSERVANCY — $15,000 · EnvironmentThe Boca Grande Preschool Inc — $25,000 · EducationTHE GRIEF CLUB OF MINNESOTA — $20,000 · HealthCOLORADO VILLAGE COLLABORATIVE — $20,000 · Housing & ShelterSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,223,500Human Services$385,000Youth Development$234,013Environment$40,000Education$25,000Health$20,000Housing & Shelter$20,000Food & Nutrition$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYOUTHLINK — $245,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetINVEST IN KIDS — $234,013 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMONBOND COMMUNITIES — $200,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INC — $115,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION — $28,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOURTE OREILLES LAKES ASSOCIATION INC — $25,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetPARK NICOLLET GROUP RETURN — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHammer Residences Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GRIEF CLUB OF MINNESOTA — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCOLORADO VILLAGE COLLABORATIVE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLAKE EFFECT CONSERVANCY — $15,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YOUTHLINK
  • Who funds INVEST IN KIDS
  • Who funds COMMONBOND COMMUNITIES
  • Who funds ETHIOPIAN COMMUNITY DEV COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
  • Who funds PARK NICOLLET FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COURTE OREILLES LAKES ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds PARK NICOLLET GROUP RETURN
  • Who funds Hammer Residences Inc
  • Who funds The Boca Grande Preschool Inc
  • Who funds THE GRIEF CLUB OF MINNESOTA
  • Who funds COLORADO VILLAGE COLLABORATIVE
  • Who funds LAKE EFFECT CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST HEARTLAND

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization B & H Way Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to B & H Way Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to B & H Way Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph