· Private foundation
Azfar & Maheen Malik Fam Fdn Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $131k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY | $50,000 |
| KOOHI GOTH WOMEN HOSPITAL | $30,000 |
| FRIENDS OF HSMH - HASAN SULEMAN MEMORIAL | $30,000 |
| RISE UP TRANSITIONAL RESOURCES | $24,500 |
| DEAF-REACH INC | $13,000 |
| ISLAMIC FOUNDATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS | $13,000 |
| NORTHWEST ISLAMIC CENTER | $10,000 |
| UNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PAKISTAN CHILDREN RELIEF | $7,500 |
| LITTLE ANGELS FOUNDATION | $7,500 |
| FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC | $6,172 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| I-CARE FUND AMERICA INC | $5,000 |
| EQUITAS FORUM USA | $2,500 |
| ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 48% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DIDEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC3× · 2023–2025 · $120k · revenue +14%
- UPUNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION3× · 2023–2025 · $50k · revenue +29%
- FOFRIENDS OF HSMH INC2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +196%
Funded once
THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USAone grant, 2023 · $19k · revenue +19%- RCRIVER CITY JOURNALISM FUND INCone grant, 2023 · $13k · revenue -38%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +48%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To pay for medical staff and provide free medicine for for poor people
Healthcare for people in need.
Medical assistance, education, assistance for widows and the elderly, and housing assistance is provided to the poor of india. the organization will get financial support from people of sub-continent orgin who wish to see better conditions…
To improve the quality of life of and access to opportunities for children in need in india by providing children with the support and love they need to flourish and grow into happy, contributing members of their society.
To promote human development by preserving life through improving health and education amongst the poor people in pakistan. to provide clean potable water, support and education for orphans and homeless
To provide sustainable, equitable and effecient health care services to the most vulnerable individuals and communities around the world.
To provide critical medical services and treatment free for infants & children regardless of race and religion
The foundation provides medical grants and educational assistance to needy groups and organizations.
To better service the under-privilege population medically both domestic and foreign through ongoing support and disaster relief.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is I-Care Fund America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Equitas Forum Usa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 23% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DEVELOPMENTS IN LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITY PRODUCTIONS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF INDUS HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF HSMH INC ↗
- Who funds RISE UP TRANSITIONAL RESOUCES ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST ISLAMIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CITIZENS FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds DEAF-REACH INC ↗
- Who funds Little Angels Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds RIVER CITY JOURNALISM FUND INC ↗
- Who funds EQUITAS FORUM USA ↗
- Who funds PAKISTAN CHILDREN RELIEF ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK ZAKAT INC ↗
- Who funds I-CARE FUND AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds ICNA RELIEF USA PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE WEST COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds DOW 98 FUND INC ↗
- Who funds HEAL PALESTINE INC ↗
- Who funds SUSTAINABLE HEALTHCARE INITIATIVES NOW EMPOWERING HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds Muslim Community Services of St Louis Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL HEALTH FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF GREATER ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds HUMANITI FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AL-SHIFA FOUNDATION OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Malik Family Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Azfar & Maheen Malik Fam Fdn Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- University of Maryland Baltimore Foundation Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.