Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Athwin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$284k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Arts & Culture$656kHuman Services$426kHousing & Shelter$350kHealth$275kEducation$271kEnvironment$263kAnimals$145kYouth Development$131kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k40 grants · $182k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $102k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CANTUS$20,000
SOUTHSIDE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER$16,000
WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER$15,000
THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$15,000
FAMILY PROIMISE OF ANOKA CTY$13,000
LAKES AREA MUSIC FESTIVAL$12,000
YOUNG DANCE$11,000
CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY$8,000
PAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$8,000
WASHBURN CENTER FOR CHILDREN$7,000
GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS CENTER$7,000
MY VERY OWN BED$7,000
THE ALIVENESS PROJECT$7,000
THE OPEN DOOR PANTRY$6,000
MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $472k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%FAMILY PROIMISE OF ANOKA CTY: $13k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE OF ANOKA COUNTY: $12k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE OF ANOKA COUNTY: $12k → 7%FAMILY PROMISE OF ANOKA COUNTY: $10k → 7%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 11%FAMILY PROIMISE OF ANOKA CTY: $14k → 7%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 11%FAMILY PROIMISE OF ANOKA CTY: $13k → 7%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 11%FAMILY PROIMISE OF ANOKA CTY: $13k → 7%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 11%FAMILY PROIMISE OF ANOKA CTY: $13k → 7%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS CENTER: $7k → 11%FAMILY PROIMISE OF ANOKA CTY: $30k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS PATHWAYS: $10k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS PATHWAYS: $10k → 11%MINNEAPOLIS PATHWAYS: $10k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $5k → 11%REDEEMER CENTER FOR LIFE: $5k → 11%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $6k → 11%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $6k → 11%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY: $6k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $5k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $5k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $5k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $5k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $5k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 11%CHANGE INC: $5k → 14%CHANGE INC: $5k → 14%GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS CENTER: $12k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 11%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $7k → 11%TIWAHE FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%TIWAHE FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $5k → 11%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $5k → 11%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $5k → 11%TIWAHE FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $5k → 11%FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $25k → 11%FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 11%FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $15k → 11%CRESCENT COVE: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.7M · 62 repeat orgs$102k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

62 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

62
17

Total granted

$2.7M
$102k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
-6%

Still filing today

76%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEnvironmentHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WR
    WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA
    9× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +133%
  • C
    CANTUS
    6× · 2020–2025 · $134k · revenue +59%
  • FP
    Family Promise in Anoka County
    9× · 2017–2025 · $130k · revenue +377%

Funded once

  • CC
    CARLETON COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue +39%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • EO
    ERNEST OBERHOLTZER FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $7k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
MinnPost

MinnPost produces independent journalism to serve as a trusted guide for Minnesotans exploring the critical issues, challenges and opportunities facing our state.

Arts & Culture
2
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

—
3
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
4
African Development Center

Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota

Human Services
5
Mn Community Measurement

Mn community measurement empowers stakeholders with meaningful information to drive improvement.

Health
6
St Paul Transportation Management Organization

Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…

Environment
7
United Way of Ne Minnesota

United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.

—
8
Minnesota Voice

Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.

Public Benefit
9
Arts Midwest Incorporated

Arts Midwest works collaboratively with private and public arts supporters to support, inform, and celebrate arts organizations and creative communities across the Midwest. Our mission is to build unprecedented opportunity across the…

Arts & Culture
10
Connectability of Mn Inc

Connectability of mn, inc. works to advance the independence, productivity, and full citizenship of people experiencing physical or invisible barriers.

—
11
Minnesota Chapter of the National Childrens Alliance

The Minnesota Children's Alliance leads the development and growth of locally based children's advocacy centers and multidisciplinary teams to ensure equitable access to services for healing and growth.

Crime & Legal
12
Reach for Resources Inc

Empowering people of all abilities to reach their full potential. we provide individualized services that maximize independence, boosts community engagement and improves physical and emotional well-being.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bountifield International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth & Family Support Serv…Union Trade Benefit FundsCommunity Health and Family…Professional Trade Associat…Policy & Systems Change Adv…Senior Care & Housing Servi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%2%<5yr13%7%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr19%26%20–35yr15%29%35–55yr13%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%3%<5yr13%3%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr19%29%20–35yr15%23%35–55yr13%22%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/59
the rest of the field
14%
1,923/13,662

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/57
Grantees still filing
33/57
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL — $101,000 · OtherCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAULHAVEN HOUSING — $101,000 · OtherHAVEN HOUSINGNATURE CONSERVANCY THE — $65,000 · OtherNATURE CONSERVANCY THECANTUS MALE VOCAL ENSEMBLE — $65,000 · OtherCANTUS MALE VOCAL ENSEMBLEPAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $61,500 · OtherALIVENESS PROJECT INC — $40,000 · OtherTHE OPEN DOOR PANTRY — $39,000 · OtherMINNESOTA LAND TRUST — $76,000 · OtherMINNESOTA LAND TRUSTWashburn Center for Children — $71,000 · OtherWashburn Center for ChildrenMy Very Own Bed — $49,000 · Other+36 more — $487,250 · Other+36 moreCANTUS — $134,000 · Arts & CultureCANTUSLAKES AREA MUSIC FESTIVAL — $104,000 · Arts & CultureLAKES AREA MUSIC FES…MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $82,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA HISTORICAL…YOUNG DANCE INC — $73,500 · Arts & CultureYOUNG DANCE INCAMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM — $54,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN COMPOSERS F…MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC — $36,000 · Arts & CultureMACPHAIL CENTER FOR …+4 more — $20,000 · Arts & CultureThe Family Partnership — $145,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Partners…Family Promise in Anoka County — $129,500 · Human ServicesFamily Promise in A…GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY — $65,000 · Human ServicesGREATER MINNEAPOLIS…CRESCENT COVE — $40,000 · Human ServicesCRESCENT COVEPATHWAYS NORTH — $30,000 · Human ServicesPATHWAYS NORTHDIVISION OF INDIAN WORK — $27,000 · Human ServicesDIVISION OF INDIAN …THE TIWAHE FOUNDATION — $17,000 · Human Services+2 more — $18,000 · Human ServicesWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA — $145,000 · AnimalsGREAT RIVER GREENING — $40,000 · AnimalsHILL MUSEUM & MANUSCRIPT LIBRARY — $59,000 · EducationYouthprise — $38,000 · EducationCARLETON COLLEGE — $30,000 · EducationEAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER — $17,000 · EducationGROVES ACADEMY — $15,000 · EducationCIVIC CAUCUS — $12,500 · EducationMINNDEPENDENT — $8,000 · EducationCUYUNA RANGE YOUTH CENTER INC — $67,000 · Youth DevelopmentAVENUES FOR YOUTH — $52,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE REEL HOPE PROJECT — $24,000 · Youth DevelopmentSOUTHSIDE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER — $131,000 · Crime & LegalMediation Services For Anoka County — $11,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,155,750Arts & Culture$503,500Human Services$471,500Animals$185,000Education$179,500Youth Development$143,500Crime & Legal$142,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Family Partnership — $145,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA — $145,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetCANTUS — $134,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetSOUTHSIDE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER — $131,000 over 9y, 1.7% of budgetFamily Promise in Anoka County — $129,500 over 9y, 8.6% of budgetLAKES AREA MUSIC FESTIVAL — $104,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL — $101,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN HOUSING — $101,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetMINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $82,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMINNESOTA LAND TRUST — $76,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG DANCE INC — $73,500 over 8y, 4.8% of budgetWashburn Center for Children — $71,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCUYUNA RANGE YOUTH CENTER INC — $67,000 over 9y, 15% of budgetGREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY — $65,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $61,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHILL MUSEUM & MANUSCRIPT LIBRARY — $59,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM — $54,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetAVENUES FOR YOUTH — $52,500 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetMy Very Own Bed — $49,000 over 7y, 2.1% of budgetCRESCENT COVE — $40,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetGREAT RIVER GREENING — $40,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetALIVENESS PROJECT INC — $40,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC — $38,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYouthprise — $38,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC — $36,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER — $35,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetANN BANCROFT FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDIVISION OF INDIAN WORK — $27,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE REEL HOPE PROJECT — $24,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTHE TIWAHE FOUNDATION — $17,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetEAST SIDE LEARNING CENTER — $17,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBOUNTIFIELD INTERNATIONAL — $16,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGROVES ACADEMY — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROSE ENSEMBLE — $14,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCHANGE INC — $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCIVIC CAUCUS — $12,500 over 8y, 11% of budgetMobile Hope — $12,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetLAND STEWARDSHIP PROJECT — $12,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMediation Services For Anoka County — $11,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetTHE OPEN DOOR — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMINNDEPENDENT — $8,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ST PAUL CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC — $8,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWOLF RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER — $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEAST SIDE FREEDOM LIBRARY — $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHANGING GAITS INC — $6,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWESTERN LAKE SUPERIOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $6,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetDEL E WEBB CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Family Partnership ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds CANTUS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHSIDE FAMILY NURTURING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Family Promise in Anoka County ↗
  • Who funds LAKES AREA MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ST PAUL ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN HOUSING ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG DANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Washburn Center for Children ↗
  • Who funds CUYUNA RANGE YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CRISIS NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds PAGE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILL MUSEUM & MANUSCRIPT LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMPOSERS FORUM ↗
  • Who funds AVENUES FOR YOUTH ↗
  • Who funds My Very Own Bed ↗
  • Who funds CRESCENT COVE ↗
  • Who funds GREAT RIVER GREENING ↗
  • Who funds ALIVENESS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S DENTAL SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Youthprise ↗
  • Who funds MACPHAIL CENTER FOR MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER ↗
  • Who funds ANN BANCROFT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAYS NORTH ↗
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK ↗
  • Who funds THE REEL HOPE PROJECT ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saint Paul & Minnesot…The Minneapolis Found…Otto Bremer TrustMightycause Charitabl…Fr Bigelow FoundationPatrick and Aimee But…The Richard M Schulze…Xcel Energy FoundationPohlad Family Foundat…Margaret a Cargill Fo…Mardag FoundationCh Robinson Worldwide…
Saint Paul & Minnesota FoundationMN62.1× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Patrick and Aimee Butler Family · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Mardag Foundation · Ch Robinson Worldwide Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Athwin Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines