· Private foundation
Assurance Caring Together Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 28 grants below total $289,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $372,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $82,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k11 grants · $51k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $239k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Special Speces, Inc. | $25,000 |
| Special Olympics Illinois | $20,000 |
| National Alliance on Mental Illness | $20,000 |
| The Chicago Lighthouse | $20,000 |
| Northern Illinois Food Bank | $20,000 |
| Above & Beyond Family Recovery Center | $15,000 |
| The Gathering Place | $15,000 |
| Kaleidoscope Youth Center | $12,000 |
| Brave Space Alliance | $12,000 |
| Mid-Ohio Food Collective | $10,000 |
| Cincinnati Worksw Inc. | $10,000 |
| Honor Flight Chicago Corp | $10,000 |
| AMG Fitness Foundation | $10,000 |
| Femergy | $10,000 |
| Ohio's Hospice Foundation Inc. | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $69k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $265k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AHAmerican Heart Association Inc2× · 2018–2021 · $55k · revenue +26%
- HFHonor Flight Chicago Corp4× · 2017–2024 · $41k · revenue +31%
- SSSPECIAL SPACES INC2× · 2017–2018 · $33k · revenue +242%
Funded once
- HFHONOR FLIGHT, INCone grant, 2021 · $30k
- VFVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue ×45
- ARAmerican Red Crossone grant, 2018 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A better chicago is changing how chicago fights poverty by investing in bold ideas that create opportunity for our youth.
Nourishing hope provides food, mental health support, and social services to help all our neighbors thrive.
The mission of goodwill is to create opportunities for individuals with barriers to enhance their lives. barriers include physical or mental disabilities, lack of education and job preparation, socio-economic disadvantages, and others.…
To assist children who have been victims of abuse
Volunteers of america of illinois partners with the people we serve to create transformational and lasting change in their lives through programs that support, empower, and transform.
Providing academic support to children experiencing homelessness in Chicago and providing resources and services to families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.
Children's advocates for change was organized to improve the lives of children in illinois by bringing about significant changes public policies and programs for children through research, policy analysis and advocacy, public education and…
Helping chicagoland's at-risk children and their families build, achieve and sustain better lives.
Child Link provides foster care, family counseling, and therapy services to Chicago area adolescents who are at risk of homelessness. Child Link also refers adolescents to other agencies that are able to provide additional resources and…
To enhance the quality of life for children and families by inspiring hope and empowerment and growth within all whom we serve.
The Foodbank's mission is to provide food, and develop awareness of and creative solutions for food insecurity. Annually, the Foodbank distributes approximately 9.5 million pounds of food to 130 food pantries, soup kitchens, children's…
At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc and the most unlike its peers is Project Mobility Cycles for Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds Role Model Movement Inc (NFP) ↗
- Who funds Honor Flight Chicago Corp ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL SPACES INC ↗
- Who funds Above and Beyond Family Recovery Center NFP ↗
- Who funds VOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Inspiration Corporation ↗
- Who funds NAMI National ↗
- Who funds Victims First Inc ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
- Who funds GROWING HOME INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds Kaleidoscope Youth Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FEMERGY ↗
- Who funds JENNIFER S FALLICK CANCER SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds OHIO'S HOSPICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SHELTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Motorola Solutions Foundation · The Dupage Community Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Cme Group Community Foundation F/K/A Nymex Foundation · The Coleman Foundation Inc · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Assurance Caring Together Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.