Skip to content
Association of University Centers on Disabilities at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Association of University Centers on Disabilities

Aucd's mission is to advance policies and practices that improve the health, education, social and economic well-being of all people with developmental and other disabilities, their families, and their communities by supporting our members in research, education, health and service activities that achieve our vision.

$957k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$365k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Science & Tech$12MHealth$12MEducation$2.7MHuman Services$563kInternational$390kCommunity Improvement$177kRecreation & Sports$115kYouth Development$72k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $543k
  • $250k+1 grant · $365k
$82,743
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE CENTER$364,710
ILLINOIS ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM$171,844
UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON$156,131
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA$82,743
GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY$82,576
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$50,015
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$39,122
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY$7,884
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 55% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FAMILY VOICES: $161k → 8%DOCS FOR TOTS: $89k → 6%FAMILY VOICES: $27k → 14%ARKANSAS CHAPTER AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $103k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S FORUM: $80k → 19%SOUTH DAKOTA PARENT CONNECTION: $86k → 9%GREEN MOUNTAIN SELF-ADVOCATES INC: $22k → 9%FAMILY VOICES: $126k → 8%DOCS FOR TOTS: $81k → 6%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS: $176k → 14%MY HEALTH MY RESOURCES OF TERRANT COUNTY: $39k → 11%FAMILY VOICES: $21k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS: $40k → 17%THE CHILDREN'S FORUM: $78k → 19%SOUTH DAKOTA PARENT CONNECTION: $68k → 9%FAMILY VOICES: $102k → 8%DOC FOR TOTS: $18k → 6%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS: $117k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S FORUM: $29k → 19%SOUTH DAKOTA PARENT CONNECTION: $27k → 9%NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS: $83k → 14%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $135k → 14%THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $124k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26M · 92 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

92 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 84 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

92
35

Total granted

$26M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+23%

Still filing today

57%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GS
    GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $898k · revenue +57%
  • AS
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $896k · revenue +12%
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION
    2× · 2017–2018 · $721k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • AE
    ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $186k
  • CC
    CONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $163k · revenue +19%
  • TA
    THE ARC OF GEORGIA SERVICES CORPORATION
    one grant, 2022 · $147k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Maryland Pediatric Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
2
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
3
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
8
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
11
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
12
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center; the most unlike its peers is Dc Autism Parents. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

73 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 73 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
72/73
Grantees still filing
59/73
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGE: $2,230,642 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VERMONT AND STATE AGRICULTURAL COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: $1,404,055 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS: $794,310 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTSGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY: $778,916 · OtherGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITYIndiana University School of Medicine: $702,565 · OtherAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $536,151 · Other+64 more: $7,990,115 · Other+64 moreOKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY: $1,455,900 · EducationOKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES…GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $897,959 · EducationGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY…WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $721,282 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY…University of Kentucky Research Foundation: $521,344 · EducationUniversity of Kentucky R…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $400,189 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $298,728 · Education+18 more: $1,718,796 · Education+18 moreAMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY INC: $896,213 · HealthAMERICAN SOCIETY …AMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC: $528,696 · HealthAMERICAN THROMBOS…NATIONAL BLOOD CLOT ALLIANCE: $488,884 · HealthNATIONAL BLOOD CL…SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $435,606 · HealthSPINA BIFIDA ASSO…Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: $396,139 · HealthJoint Commission …ADVOCATE NORTH SIDE HEALTH NETWORK: $178,971 · HealthHawai'i Pacific Health: $178,158 · HealthALL ALASKA PEDIATRIC PARTNERSHIP: $174,054 · HealthThe Childrens Hospital: $165,259 · HealthCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $163,326 · Health+10 more: $612,634 · Health+10 moreFAMILY VOICES: $437,466 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS INC: $375,811 · Human ServicesTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $259,326 · Human ServicesDOCS FOR TOTS: $188,009 · Human ServicesAPNI INC: $188,001 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S FORUM INC: $187,379 · Human ServicesSOUTH DAKOTA PARENT CONNECTION: $181,000 · Human ServicesARKANSAS CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS FOUNDATION: $143,845 · Human Services+2 more: $60,494 · Human ServicesASSOCIATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMS: $469,759 · Public BenefitSELF-ADVOCATES BECOMING EMPOWERED: $430,000 · Civil RightsUniversity of Guam Endowment Foundation Inc: $187,999 · InternationalHANDICAP INTERNATIONAL: $179,205 · International
Other$14,436,754Education$6,014,198Health$4,217,940Human Services$2,021,331Public Benefit$469,759Civil Rights$430,000International$367,204

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $897,959 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY INC: $896,213 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION: $721,282 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC: $536,151 over 3y, 6.5% of budgetAMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC: $528,696 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUniversity of Kentucky Research Foundation: $521,344 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL BLOOD CLOT ALLIANCE: $488,884 over 3y, 35% of budgetASSOCIATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMS: $469,759 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetFAMILY VOICES: $437,466 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetSPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA: $435,606 over 3y, 8.1% of budgetSELF-ADVOCATES BECOMING EMPOWERED: $430,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $400,189 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJoint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: $396,139 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS INC: $375,811 over 3y, 12% of budgetIllinois Assistive Technology Program: $332,597 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER: $298,728 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES: $259,326 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF IOWA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $243,206 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CARE AT HOME: $221,569 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE: $205,524 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION: $194,156 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOCS FOR TOTS: $188,009 over 3y, 12% of budgetBUILDING BRIGHT FUTURES STATE ADVISORY COUNCIL: $188,001 over 3y, 6.3% of budgetAPNI INC: $188,001 over 3y, 6.9% of budgetTHE PARENTS' PLACE OF MARYLAND INC: $188,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetDC AUTISM PARENTS: $187,999 over 3y, 87% of budgetUniversity of Guam Endowment Foundation Inc: $187,999 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S FORUM INC: $187,379 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSOUTH DAKOTA PARENT CONNECTION: $181,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetAmerican International College: $180,071 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHANDICAP INTERNATIONAL: $179,205 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetADVOCATE NORTH SIDE HEALTH NETWORK: $178,971 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHawai'i Pacific Health: $178,158 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $178,104 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $176,749 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetALL ALASKA PEDIATRIC PARTNERSHIP: $174,054 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetThe Childrens Hospital: $165,259 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER: $163,326 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine: $149,620 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Miami: $140,710 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN NETWORK OF COMMUNITY OPTIONS AND RESOURCES: $130,875 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetHUGO W MOSER RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT KENNEDY KRIEGER INC: $125,817 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $115,273 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOOLEY'S ANEMIA FOUNDATION: $103,318 over 2y, 3.7% of budgetCONNECTICUT CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $101,425 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER: $101,059 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSickle Cell Disease Association of America Inc: $95,460 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetWESTCHESTER INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT: $93,657 over 4y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HEALTH SCIENCES FACILITY ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY OF HEMATOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SOCIETY OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Kentucky Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BLOOD CLOT ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMS ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY VOICES ↗
  • Who funds SPINA BIFIDA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SELF-ADVOCATES BECOMING EMPOWERED ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR DIRECT SUPPORT PROFESSIONALS INC ↗
  • Who funds Illinois Assistive Technology Program ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF THE UNITED STATES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF IOWA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR CARE AT HOME ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE ↗
  • Who funds STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOCS FOR TOTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Johns Hopkins Univers…The Trustees of Colum…American Heart Associ…American Cancer Socie…Georgetown UniversityYale UniversityEmory UniversityCystic Fibrosis Found…The George Washington…Brown UniversityThe Children's Hospit…National Collegiate A…
Johns Hopkins UniversityMD28.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Johns Hopkins University · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · American Heart Association Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Georgetown University · Yale University · Emory University · Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · The George Washington University · Brown University · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · National Collegiate Athletic Association

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of University Centers on Disabilities funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of University Centers on Disabilities. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Statewide Parent Advocacy Network Inc: 72% of income from government
  • Green Mountain Self Advocates Inc: 48% of income from government
  • Family Voices: 39% of income from government
  • Hugo W Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger Inc: 39% of income from government
  • The Parents' Place of Maryland Inc: 30% of income from government
  • University of Delaware: 30% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Autism Society of America Inc: 8% of income from government
  • University of Miami: 5% of income from government
  • Connecticut Children's Medical Center: 5% of income from government
  • American International College: 1% of income from government
  • Children's Forum Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 128 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Association of University Centers on Disabilities’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home