Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Association of Clinicians for the Underserved Inc

ACUs mission is to improve the health of underserved communities and to support and develop those clinicians who serve them.

$125k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20202022.

Health$245kHuman Services$35kOther$70k
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOWELL COMMUNITY HEALTH$25,000
EL DORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH CE$25,000
NATIVE HEALTH INC$25,000
MARIAS HEALTHCARE SERVICE$25,000
PCHS OF ALASKA$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EAST HARLEM COUNCIL FOR HUMAN: $10k → 17%COLORADO COALITION FOR HOMELE: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
MT
ND
NY
MA
IN
OH
CA
CO
MO
AZ
TN
HI
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Horizon Health Care Inc

Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.

Health
2
Heartland Community Health Clinic D/B/a Heartland Health Services

Provide affordable, high-quality health services and remove inequities to improve the lives of all.

Health
3
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

4
Interior Community Health Center

Our mission is to provide universal access to excellent primary health care for patients of all ages, stages of life, and backgrounds.

Health
5
Community Health Services Inc

To provide medical services for the residents of the greater hartford connecticut area. to provide quality health care services to low and moderate income individuals in the greater hartford connecticut area regardless of ability to pay.

Health
6
Universal Community Health Center

The organization provides quality and accessible health care to underserved communties and a pateint centered model of care to empower communities towards wellness.

Health
7
Community Health Systems Inc

Operate primary health care clinics, ultrasound, ob/gyn and five pharmacies.

8
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
9
Community Health Center of Snohomish County

Community health center of snohomish county (chc) provides our diverse communities with access to high quality, affordable primary health care.

Health
10
Community Health Care Inc

Community health care provides the communities we serve with excellence in patient-centered medical, dental, and behavioral health care that is compassionate, affordable, and accessible.

11
Charles River Community Health Inc

To partner with individuals and families so they can thrive and lead healthier lives by delivering the comprehensive, integrated, and equitable primary healthcare that matters most to them.

Health
12
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Texas Area Community Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Native Health. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%5%10–20yr16%55%20–35yr13%35%35–55yr16%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%7%10–20yr16%44%20–35yr13%46%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,545

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
18/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LOWELL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $25,000 · HealthLOWELL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INCCOLUMBUS NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC — $25,000 · HealthCOLUMBUS NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INCEL DORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $25,000 · HealthEL DORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERHARVARD STREET NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC — $25,000 · HealthHARVARD STREET NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INCCHEROKEE HEALTH SYSTEMS — $25,000 · HealthCHEROKEE HEALTH SYSTEMSFAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OF DARKE COUNTY INC — $25,000 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OF DARKE COUNTY INCPeninsula Community Health Services of Alaska — $25,000 · HealthPeninsula Community Health Services of AlaskaOMNI FAMILY HEALTH — $10,000 · HealthLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 · HealthEAST GEORGIA HEALTHCARE CENTER INC — $10,000 · HealthNORTH TEXAS AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 · HealthTREASURE COAST COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $10,000 · HealthREGIONAL HEALTH CARE CLINIC INC — $10,000 · HealthSPECTRA HEALTH — $10,000 · HealthNATIVE HEALTH — $25,000 · OtherNATIVE HEALTHMARIAS HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC — $25,000 · OtherMARIAS HEALTHCARE SERV…HEALTHLINC INC — $10,000 · OtherHEALTHLINC INCVALLEY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC — $10,000 · OtherVALLEY HEALTHCARE SYST…Colorado Coalition for the Homeless — $25,000 · Human ServicesColorado Co…East Harlem Council for Human Services Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesEast Harlem…
Health$245,000Other$70,000Human Services$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLOWELL COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEL DORADO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE HEALTH — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARVARD STREET NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARIAS HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHEROKEE HEALTH SYSTEMS — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH SERVICES OF DARKE COUNTY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPeninsula Community Health Services of Alaska — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetColorado Coalition for the Homeless — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOMNI FAMILY HEALTH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTHLINC INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLANAI COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEast Harlem Council for Human Services Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS AREA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTREASURE COAST COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIONAL HEALTH CARE CLINIC INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECTRA HEALTH — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVALLEY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Direct ReliefCA39.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Direct Relief · American Cancer Society Inc · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation · Americares Foundation Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Association of Clinicians for the Underserved Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 17%
  • Lowell Community Health Center Inc34% of income from government
  • Treasure Coast Community Health Inc17% of income from government
  • Harvard Street Neighborhood Health Center Inc13% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Association of Clinicians for the Underserved Inc?

Find your warmest path to Association of Clinicians for the Underserved Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph