How much did ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC grant in FY2022?

ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC reported 23 grants totaling $3,340,551 in its FY2022 IRS filing.

Where is ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC based?

ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC is based in MD.

ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC

| Explanation:| Associated Black Charities ABC is a racial equity organization that works as an educator advocate supporter and convener to address and eliminate the barriers created by structural racism and to advance long-term solutions that create new opportunities for Black people to thrive.

$3.3M

Granted FY2022

Grants

Communities

$489k

Largest

01What you fund

0170% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2022.

Health$24MEducation$19MHousing & Shelter$4.9MHuman Services$2.3MCommunity Improvement$1.5MRecreation & Sports$733kCrime & Legal$687kYouth Development$638kArts & Culture$570kOther$25M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

baltimore youthgala

2019

baltimore youthworkforcechangepolicypotentialbuilddrive

2020

covidhealthmedicalhousingmental illnessillness hivhiv aids

2021

covideducate studentsstudents fosterfoster independentindependent originaloriginal researchresearch share

2022

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2022 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

$10k–50k7 grants · $212k
$50k–250k13 grants · $1.9M
$250k+3 grants · $1.3M

$117,836

Median grant

States reached

$2.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

JOHN G BARTLETT SPECIALTY PRACTICEADULT MOORE$488,685
TOTAL HEALTH CARE INC$436,614
UM INSTITUTE OF HUMAN VIROLOGY$344,117
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE PED$211,999
MOVEABLE FEAST$204,281
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE DENTAL$200,042
NEW VISION HOUSE OF HOPE$184,507
CHASE BREXTON HEALTH SERVICES$172,232
PROJECT PLASE$162,149
PARK WEST MEDICAL CENTER$150,261
HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS$127,076
LIGHT HEALTH AND WELLNESS COMPREHENSIVE$117,836
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY PEDIATRICS$96,645
HARFORD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT$81,264
SISTERS TOGETHER & REACHING$77,076

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$76M · 61 repeat orgs$3.4M to everyone else

61 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2022, 44 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$76M

$3.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%

Still filing today

70%

66%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthArts & CultureRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JOHNS HOPKINS-OBGYN
6× · 2017–2022 · $16M · revenue +45%
UO
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE PED
6× · 2017–2022 · $12M · revenue +35%
CB
Chase Brexton Health Services Inc
6× · 2017–2022 · $7.1M · revenue +74%

Funded once

UW
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND
one grant, 2019 · $322k · revenue +9%
BC
BALTIMORE CITY HEALTH DEPT - STD
one grant, 2018 · $289k
BC
BALTIMORE COUNTY HEALTH DEPT
one grant, 2019 · $280k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Baltimore Corps Inc

To enlist talent to accelerate social innovation in baltimore and advance a citywide agenda for equity and racial justice.

Employment

Family League of Baltimore City Inc

Family League of Baltimore works collaboratively to support data-informed, community-driven solutions that align resources to dismantle the systemic barriers which limit the possibilities for children, families, and communities

Human Services

City of Baltimore Development Corporatio

The city of baltimore development corporation (bdc) is contracted with the city of baltimore to provide economic development services.

Community Improvement

Baltimore Area Health Education Center

To eliminate health disparities by educating and strengthening the health care workforce. bahec provides interdisciplinary education programs that bridge academic, healthcare, and community settings see sched o

Health

Baltimore Hunger Project Llc

Baltimore hunger project removes the barriers to learning by providing food and resources to children facing food insecurity in our community.

Human Services

Baltimore Curriculum Project Inc

Build an efficient and detailed curriculum for all interested baltimore city public schools.

Education

Community Mediation Program Inc

To provide free mediation services in the baltimore metropolitan area for the purposes of reducing interpersonal and community violence. the program also provides community education and conflict resolution training.

Human Services

Baltimore Regional Housing Partnership

Expands housing choices of low-income families in safe & economically vibrant communities.

Housing & Shelter

Metropolitan Baltimore Council of

The mission of the metropolititan baltimore council afl-cio unions is to improve the lives of working families to bring economic justice to the workplace and social justice to our state and the nation.

—

Greater Baltimore Committee Inc

To provide a strong, unified and effective voice for the business community in the functional area of urban affairs and public policy, business services and information, and economic development, thereby promoting the Baltimore Region as…

—

Mentoring Mentors Inc

Mentoring Mentors is a Baltimore-based non-profit dedicated to developing future community leaders through exposure that leads to college and career readiness.

Youth Development

The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Corporation for a Skilled Workforce and the most unlike its peers is The Aspen Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

7/103

the rest of the field

11%

2,661/24,060

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

77 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

70/77

Grantees still filing

64/77

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Health$24,368,293Other$26,734,671Education$18,930,588Housing & Shelter$4,897,090Human Services$2,291,353Community Improvement$1,495,935Recreation & Sports$732,532

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD83.7× affinity45 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Connections Thru Life Inc · Family League of Baltimore City Inc · The Morris Goldseker Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

21get no government money at all

3rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: OMEGA BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~33 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 9 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

9 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +52% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 451609977 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on OMEGA BALTIMORE FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 33 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 98% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Associated Black Charities Inc?

Find your warmest path to Associated Black Charities Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

77 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Associated Black Charities Inc?

More from the funding graph

ASSOCIATED BLACK CHARITIES INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

77 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Associated Black Charities Inc?

More from the funding graph