Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Assist International Inc

Assist international partners with changemakers around the world to provide solutions that save lives and build resilient communities.

$10M
Granted FY2023
20
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$2.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192023.

Religion$5.9MHealth$4.7MInternational$2.7MHousing & Shelter$1.2MFood & Nutrition$518kYouth Development$497kEducation$484kHuman Services$385kOther$0
02FY2023 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 20 grants below total $6,018,800 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $10,028,287 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,009,487 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $194k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+5 grants · $4.7M
$124,999
Median grant
2
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIONS IN SIGHT OF CA$1,963,078
MODESTO MOVES$1,236,386
EZER INTERNATIONAL GROUP$655,652
GRACE IS THE KEY$483,541
CERES SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH$352,758
LOVE'S TREASURE MINISTRY$246,450
MODESTO GOSPEL MISSION$219,560
TODAY IS A NEW DAY RECOVERY HOME$151,733
CELEBRATION CHRISTIAN CENTER$134,213
NINEVEH OUTREACH$124,999
THRIVE CHURCH$101,704
FIREHOUSE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$89,321
TEEN CHALLENGE FAITH HOME$59,457
TRACY MISSION CITY CHURCH$47,820
UOP COMMUNITY RE-ENTRY PROGRAM$36,883
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–23, $350k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PURPOSE AND LEGACY: $319k → 12%PURPOSE AND LEGACY GROUP: $31k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $12M on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 5 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Central America and the Caribbean$6.9M · 59% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT WORK OF LIONS IN SIGHT PROGRAM TO PROVIDE EYEGLASSES TO VULNERABLE PEOPLE IN HAITI AND GUATEMALA. · TO SUPPORT THE DISTRIBUTION OF EYEGLASSES TO THOSE IN NEED IN GUATEMALA.

Sub-Saharan Africa$3.4M · 29% · 11 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT THE ONGOING NEEDS OF VULNERABLE PEOPLE IN NEW DAWN AND LWASI OUTREACH PROGRAMS IN UGANDA. · TO HELP SUPPORT THE ONGOING WORK OF SEWING HOPE (INCLUDING MEDICAL CLINIC) HELPING VULNERABLE CHILDREN IN UGANDA. · TO HELP SUPPORT THE ONGOING WORK OF AOET HELPING VULNERABLE CHILDREN IN UGANDA.

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$1.1M · 9% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT THE ONGOING NEEDS OF VULNERABLE CHILDREN IN CAMINUL FELIX VILLAGES IN ROMANIA. · TO HELP SUPPORT THE ONGOING WORK OF JHOR AND ONESIMUS BROTHERS HOUSE HELPING VULNERABLE PEOPLE IN ROMANIA.

East Asia and the Pacific$336k · 3% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT THE ONGOING WORK OF CAMINUL FELIX THAILAND VULNERABLE CHILDREN PROGRAMS. · OXYGEN PLANT TOOL KITS SHIPPED TO CAMBODIA FOR OXYGEN PLANT MAINTENANCE TRAINING PROGRAM.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$16k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TO SUPPORT THE ROTARY CLUB IN CALERA, ZACATECAS IN MEXICO AND THEIR WORK SUPPORTING THOSE IN NEED IN THEIR COMMUNITY.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.3M · 12 repeat orgs$7.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
34

Total granted

$9.3M
$3.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+26%

Still filing today

50%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’23
HealthHousing & ShelterReligionYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MG
    MODESTO GOSPEL MISSION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $637k · revenue +97%
  • TI
    Today Is A New Day Recovery Home Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $351k · revenue +92%
  • PA
    Purpose and Legacy
    3× · 2019–2023 · $350k · revenue +6% · 40% of their budget

Funded once

  • NL
    NEW LIFE RECOVERY HOME
    2× · 2019–2020 · $447k
  • MV
    MODESTO VICTORY LIFE CENTER FOURSQUARE CHURCH
    2× · 2018–2019 · $385k
  • G
    GRACEISTHEKEY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $323k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Come to Him Ministries

To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…

Health
2
His House Inc
Religion
3
Grace Recovery Homes Inc
Health
4
Hope City Inc
Youth Development
5
House of Hope

Assisting and housing females in recovery

6
Bountiful Harvest Ministries Inc

To provide transitional housing, accountability, and life management education. a christian alternative for homeless women and children seeking to change the focus and direction of their lives as they work toward self- sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
7
Born Again Ministries

To provide or connect low -income or ex-offenders affordable houses who wouldn't otherwise have the opportunity to have a bighter future

Health
8
Hope Street Ministry Inc

Hope street provides housing and healing to men, women, and children whose lives have been profoundly affected by the toxic environment they grew up in, their own choices, or drug and alcohol abuse. empowered by the active grace of christ,…

Health
9
Cover the Homeless Ministry

This organization provides clothing, food, and medical services to low income citizens in various areas of southern california and reunite them with family

Human Services
10
Faithful Servants Ministry

Housing the homeless

Human Services
11
Healing Heart Ministries Inc
12
Source of Hope Ministries
Religion

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cityteam Ministries and the most unlike its peers is International Medicine Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyUniversity FoundationsK-8 Charter SchoolsSenior Affordable HousingStudent Academic SupportInternational Humanitarian …Food Assistance & Basic Nee…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%2%<5yr15%16%5–10yr20%34%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr13%7%35–55yr12%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%17%5–10yr20%46%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr13%1%35–55yr12%12%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/60
the rest of the field
13%
6,739/52,384

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/36
Grantees still filing
21/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CERES SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCH — $1,999,796 · OtherCERES SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTIST CHURCHLIONS IN SIGHT OF CALIFORNIA AND AND NEVADA INC — $1,963,078 · OtherLIONS IN SIGHT OF CALIFORNIA AND AND NEVADA INCHEALTHCARE ACCESS INTERNATIONAL GROUP - HAIG — $655,652 · OtherHEALTHCARE ACCESS INTERNATIONAL GROUP - HAIGCELEBRATION CHRISTIAN CENTER — $578,316 · OtherCELEBRATION CHRISTIAN CENTERNINEVEH OUTREACH — $461,016 · OtherNEW LIFE RECOVERY HOME — $447,058 · OtherMODESTO VICTORY LIFE CENTER FOURSQUARE CHURCH — $385,205 · OtherNORTH AMERICAN CONFERENCE OF THE CHURCH OF GOD SEVENTH DAY — $352,758 · OtherToday Is A New Day Recovery Home Inc — $351,119 · Other+38 more — $2,979,832 · Other+38 moreMODESTO MOVES — $4,230,327 · HealthMODESTO MOVES+2 more — $88,110 · HealthMODESTO GOSPEL MISSION — $636,539 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $11,467 · Housing & ShelterEducation is Key — $483,541 · EducationPurpose and Legacy — $349,665 · Human ServicesCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $278,730 · ReligionKOINONIA CONFERENCE GROUNDS — $25,432 · ReligionFIREHOUSE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN CORPORATION — $301,698 · Crime & Legal
Other$10,173,830Health$4,318,437Housing & Shelter$648,006Education$483,541Human Services$349,665Religion$304,162Crime & Legal$301,698

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMODESTO GOSPEL MISSION — $636,539 over 7y, 3.5% of budgetPurpose and Legacy — $349,665 over 3y, 40% of budgetFIREHOUSE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN CORPORATION — $301,698 over 7y, 98% of budgetCITYTEAM MINISTRIES — $278,730 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOakdale Rescue Mission — $76,761 over 3y, 96% of budgetFAITH HOME TEEN CHALLENGE — $59,457 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetTRACY CITY CENTER ASSOCIATION — $47,820 over 2y, 10% of budgetGIVING CHILDREN HOPE — $46,240 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS INC — $36,883 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCAMP TAYLOR INC — $36,775 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetFIRST RESPONDERS SUPPORT NETWORK — $28,653 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetKOINONIA CONFERENCE GROUNDS — $25,432 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGREAT VALLEY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $11,467 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $5,977 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE STANISLAUS COUNTY — $5,307 over 2y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MODESTO MOVES
  • Who funds LIONS IN SIGHT OF CALIFORNIA AND AND NEVADA INC
  • Who funds MODESTO GOSPEL MISSION
  • Who funds Education is Key
  • Who funds Today Is A New Day Recovery Home Inc
  • Who funds Purpose and Legacy
  • Who funds FIREHOUSE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEN CORPORATION
  • Who funds CITYTEAM MINISTRIES
  • Who funds WAVE MISSION TEAM INC
  • Who funds Oakdale Rescue Mission
  • Who funds FAITH HOME TEEN CHALLENGE
  • Who funds TRACY CITY CENTER ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds GIVING CHILDREN HOPE
  • Who funds YOUNG COMMUNITY DEVELOPERS INC
  • Who funds CAMP TAYLOR INC
  • Who funds FIRST RESPONDERS SUPPORT NETWORK

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Stanislaus Community FoundationCA19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Stanislaus Community Foundation · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · United Way of Stanislaus County · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Good360 · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Assist International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Assist International Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Assist International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $17M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph